Meredith Peter A, Ostergren Jan, Anand Inder, Puu Margareta, Solomon Scott D, Michelson Eric L, Olofsson Bertil, Granger Christopher B, Yusuf Salim, Swedberg Karl, Pfeffer Marc A, McMurray John J V
Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 9;52(24):2000-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.011.
This study sought to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of candesartan, according to baseline blood pressure (BP), in the 4,576 patients with a low ejection fraction (EF) (<or=0.40) in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) program.
Hypotension is a predictor of poor prognosis in heart failure, yet many treatments shown to reduce morbidity and mortality lower blood pressure. This paradox creates a dilemma for physicians and may explain why low BP is reported as a reason for under-use of these agents.
The interaction between treatment and baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was examined with patients divided into 6 SBP categories (<or=100, 101 to 110, 111 to 120, 121 to 130, 131 to 140 and >or=141 mm Hg) and 4 DBP categories (<or=60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80 and >or=81 mm Hg).
Low SBP and DBP were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Baseline BP did not modify the effects of candesartan on clinical outcomes: the interaction p value between SBP category and treatment was 0.38 (0.22 for DBP category). For both placebo and candesartan, study drug discontinuation for adverse effects (especially hypotension) was highest in patients in the lowest baseline BP categories. However, the relative risk of discontinuation for hypotension, renal dysfunction, and hyperkalemia in the candesartan compared with placebo group was not increased in patients with a low baseline BP.
In patients with low EF heart failure, the relative risks and benefits of candesartan treatment were similar in patients with a low BP compared to those with a higher BP.
本研究旨在根据基线血压(BP),调查坎地沙坦在CHARM(坎地沙坦治疗心力衰竭:降低死亡率和发病率评估)计划中4576例低射血分数(EF)(≤0.40)患者中的疗效和耐受性。
低血压是心力衰竭预后不良的预测因素,但许多显示可降低发病率和死亡率的治疗方法会降低血压。这一矛盾给医生带来了困境,也可能解释了为何低血压被报告为这些药物使用不足的原因。
将患者分为6个收缩压(SBP)类别(≤100、101至110、111至120、121至130、131至140和≥141mmHg)和4个舒张压(DBP)类别(≤60、61至70、71至80和≥81mmHg),研究治疗与基线收缩压和舒张压之间的相互作用。
低SBP和DBP与更差的临床结局相关。基线BP并未改变坎地沙坦对临床结局的影响:SBP类别与治疗之间的相互作用p值为0.38(DBP类别为0.22)。对于安慰剂和坎地沙坦,因不良反应(尤其是低血压)而停用研究药物的情况在基线BP最低类别的患者中最高。然而,与安慰剂组相比,基线BP低的患者中,坎地沙坦组因低血压、肾功能不全和高钾血症而停药的相对风险并未增加。
在低EF心力衰竭患者中,与血压较高的患者相比,血压低的患者使用坎地沙坦治疗的相对风险和益处相似。