Scheel Merry Elisabeth, Pedersen Birthe D, Rosenkrands Vibeke
The School of Advanced Nursing Education at Aarhus University, Denmark.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Dec;22(4):629-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00564.x.
Nursing is often described from the point of view of either the natural or the human sciences. In contrast to this, the value foundation in Interactional nursing practice is understood from the point of view of the natural sciences as well as that of the human and social sciences. This article presents many-faceted practice-theory of nursing, which is situated in the dynamic field between these three sciences. The focus of the theory is on interaction and practice resulting in a caring practice. Here practice is based on Taylor's and MacIntyre's interpretation of this concept. Action in nursing is based on Habermas' three varied modes of action seen in the light of an understanding of the world as a system world and a life world. Nursing as an interactional practice-theory is presented with examples of interpretative nursing science, seen in the ethical action-oriented, socio-cultural framework of Taylor and Habermas. It is concluded that phenomenologic and socio-cultural research into caring practice as well as an in-depth, comprehensive interpretation of nursing practice are both highly suited to forming the fundamental theoretical framework in nursing, here seen as an interpretative nursing science. Finally, a comparison is drawn between Interactional nursing practice and Benner's theory of nursing practice.
护理通常从自然科学或人文科学的角度来描述。与此相反，互动式护理实践中的价值基础是从自然科学以及人文和社会科学的角度来理解的。本文提出了多方面的护理实践理论，该理论位于这三门科学之间的动态领域。该理论的重点是互动和实践，从而形成一种关怀实践。这里的实践基于泰勒和麦金太尔对这一概念的解释。护理中的行动基于哈贝马斯的三种不同行动模式，这是从将世界理解为系统世界和生活世界的角度来看的。作为一种互动式实践理论的护理，结合了诠释性护理科学的例子，这些例子可见于以泰勒和哈贝马斯的伦理行动导向的社会文化框架中。得出的结论是，对关怀实践的现象学和社会文化研究以及对护理实践的深入、全面诠释，都非常适合形成护理的基本理论框架，这里将护理视为一门诠释性护理科学。最后，对互动式护理实践和本纳的护理实践理论进行了比较。
