Department of Environmental Studies, Antioch New England Institute, Antioch University New England, Keene, NH 03431, USA.
Environ Manage. 2010 Jan;45(1):52-66. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9235-y. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
This article examines recent research on approaches to community-based environmental and natural resource management and reviews the commonalities and differences between these interdisciplinary and multistakeholder initiatives. To identify the most effective characteristics of Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM), I collected a multiplicity of perspectives from research teams and then grouped findings into a matrix of organizational principles and key characteristics. The matrix was initially vetted (or "field tested") by applying numerous case studies that were previously submitted to the World Bank International Workshop on CBNRM. These practitioner case studies were then compared and contrasted with the findings of the research teams. It is hoped that the developed matrix may be useful to researchers in further focusing research, understanding core characteristics of effective and sustainable CBNRM, providing practitioners with a framework for developing new CBNRM initiatives for managing the commons, and providing a potential resource for academic institutions during their evaluation of their practitioner-focused environmental management and leadership curriculum.
本文考察了最近关于基于社区的环境和自然资源管理方法的研究，并回顾了这些跨学科和多利益相关方倡议之间的共同之处和差异。为了确定基于社区的自然资源管理（CBNRM）的最有效特征，我从研究团队中收集了多种观点，然后将研究结果分组到组织原则和关键特征矩阵中。该矩阵最初通过应用先前提交给世界银行基于社区的自然资源管理国际研讨会的许多案例研究进行了审查（或“实地测试”）。然后将这些从业者案例研究与研究团队的研究结果进行了比较和对比。希望开发的矩阵可以帮助研究人员进一步聚焦研究，理解有效和可持续的 CBNRM 的核心特征，为从业者提供一个框架，用于开发新的 CBNRM 倡议来管理公共资源，并为学术机构在评估其以从业者为重点的环境管理和领导力课程时提供潜在资源。
