Li Jui-Chung Allen, Wu Lawrence L
Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica, Taiwan.
Demography. 2008 Nov;45(4):875-83. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0030.
Previous studies on trends in the intergenerational transmission of divorce have produced mixed findings, with two studies (McLanahan and Bumpass 1988; Teachman 2002) reporting no trend in divorce transmission and one study (Wolfinger 1999) finding that divorce transmission has weakened substantially. Using a stratified Cox proportional hazard model, we analyze data from the National Survey of Families and Households and find no evidence for any trend in divorce transmission. To reconcile apparent differences in results, we note that the General Social Survey data used by Wolfinger lack information on marital duration, permitting analysis only for whether respondents have divorced by interview. As a result, an apparent decline in divorce transmission could be due to inadequate adjustments for the longer exposures to risk by earlier marriage cohorts, yielding a higher probability of divorce by interview for earlier cohorts relative to more recent cohorts even if divorce risks are identical across all marriage cohorts. We confirm this possibility by using a series of discrete-time hazard logistic regressions to investigate the sensitivity of estimates of trends in divorce transmission to different adjustments for exposure to risk. We conclude that there has been no trend in the intergenerational transmission of divorce.
先前关于离婚代际传递趋势的研究结果不一,两项研究(麦克拉纳汉和邦帕斯,1988年;蒂奇曼,2002年)报告称离婚传递不存在趋势,而一项研究(沃尔芬格,1999年)发现离婚传递已大幅减弱。我们使用分层考克斯比例风险模型,分析了来自全国家庭与住户调查的数据,未发现离婚传递存在任何趋势的证据。为了调和结果上的明显差异,我们注意到沃尔芬格使用的综合社会调查数据缺乏婚姻持续时间信息,仅能分析受访者在访谈时是否已离婚。因此,离婚传递的明显下降可能是由于对早婚群体更长风险暴露期的调整不足,即便所有婚姻群体的离婚风险相同,但相对于近期群体,早婚群体在访谈时离婚的概率更高。我们通过一系列离散时间风险逻辑回归来研究离婚传递趋势估计对不同风险暴露调整的敏感性,证实了这种可能性。我们得出结论,离婚的代际传递不存在趋势。