Vella Elizabeth J, Friedman Bruce H
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Maine, 96 Falmouth St., Portland, ME 04104, USA.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Jun;72(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
Hostility and anger have been attributed as psychosocial risk factors for coronary heart disease. Heightened cardiovascular reactivity (CVR), and poor recovery, to provocative stressors are thought to hasten this risk.
To examine the relationship between hostility and anger inhibition (AI), and the moderating situational influences of harassment and evaluation, in predicting CVR and recovery to mental arithmetic (MA) stress using a multiple regression approach.
48 male undergraduate students engaged in the following 3 minute tasks during recording of the electrocardiogram, impedance cardiography, and blood pressure: baseline, MA, and evaluation. Hostility and AI were assessed with the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale and the Speilberger Anger In subscale, respectively.
An interaction between hostility and AI showed high diastolic blood pressure reactivity to the MA task among hostile anger inhibitors. Harassment did not modify this effect. However, harasser evaluation predicted prolonged systolic blood pressure (SBP) responding among men scoring high in AI, and facilitated SBP recovery among those scoring low on AI.
The findings highlight the interactive influences of AI and hostility in predicting CVR to stress and underscore the importance of recovery assessments in understanding the potentially pathogenic associations of these constructs.
敌意和愤怒被认为是冠心病的心理社会风险因素。对挑衅性应激源的心血管反应性(CVR)增强以及恢复不良被认为会加速这种风险。
采用多元回归方法,研究敌意与愤怒抑制(AI)之间的关系,以及骚扰和评估的情境调节影响,以预测对心算(MA)应激的CVR和恢复情况。
48名男性本科生在记录心电图、阻抗心动图和血压期间进行以下3分钟任务:基线、MA和评估。分别使用库克-梅德利敌意量表和斯皮尔伯格愤怒抑制分量表评估敌意和AI。
敌意与AI之间的相互作用表明,在敌意愤怒抑制者中,对MA任务的舒张压反应性较高。骚扰并未改变这种效应。然而,骚扰者评估预测,AI得分高的男性收缩压(SBP)反应持续时间延长,而AI得分低的男性SBP恢复加快。
研究结果突出了AI和敌意对预测应激CVR的交互影响,并强调了恢复评估在理解这些构念潜在致病关联中的重要性。