Suppr超能文献

爱尔兰无烟工作场所立法对酒吧工作人员吸烟情况的影响。

The effect of the Irish smoke-free workplace legislation on smoking among bar workers.

作者信息

Mullally Bernie J, Greiner Birgit A, Allwright Shane, Paul Gillian, Perry Ivan J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, National University of Ireland, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, Cork, Republic of Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2009 Apr;19(2):206-11. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

On 29 March 2004, the Republic of Ireland (ROI) became the first EU country to introduce a nationwide ban on workplace smoking. While the focus of this measure was to protect worker health by reducing exposure to second-hand smoke, other effects such as a greater reduction in smoking prevalence and consumption were likely among bar workers.

METHODS

A random sample of bar workers from Cork city were surveyed before (n = 129) and after (n = 107; 82.9% follow-up rate) implementation of the smoke-free legislation. Self report and combined self report and cotinine concentration were used to determine smoking status. For comparison a cross-sectional random telephone survey of the general population (ROI) was conducted before and 1 year after the smoke-free legislation. There were 1240 pre- and 1221 participants post-ban in the equivalent age and occupational subset of the general population.

RESULTS

There was a non-significant decline in smoking prevalence among bar workers 1 year post-ban (self report: -2.8% from 51.4% to 48.6%, P = 0.51; combined self report and cotinine: -4.7% from 56.1% to 51.4%, P = 0.13), but a significant decline in consumption of four cigarettes (95% CI 2.21-6.36) per day. Within the occupationally equivalent general population sub-sample there was a significant drop (3.5%, P = 0.06) in smoking prevalence but no significant change in consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Ireland's smoke-free workplace legislation was accompanied by a drop in smoking prevalence in both bar workers and the general population sub-sample.

摘要

背景

2004年3月29日,爱尔兰共和国成为首个在全国范围内禁止在工作场所吸烟的欧盟国家。虽然这项措施的重点是通过减少二手烟暴露来保护工人健康,但酒吧工作人员中可能还出现了其他影响,比如吸烟率和吸烟量的更大幅度下降。

方法

在无烟立法实施前(n = 129)和实施后(n = 107;随访率82.9%),对科克市的酒吧工作人员进行了随机抽样调查。采用自我报告以及自我报告与可替宁浓度相结合的方式来确定吸烟状况。为作比较,在无烟立法实施前和实施后1年,对爱尔兰共和国普通人群进行了横断面随机电话调查。在普通人群中,年龄和职业相当的子样本在禁令实施前有1240名参与者,禁令实施后有1221名参与者。

结果

禁令实施1年后,酒吧工作人员的吸烟率有不显著下降(自我报告:从51.4%降至48.6%,下降2.8%,P = 0.51;自我报告与可替宁相结合:从56.1%降至51.4%,下降4.7%,P = 0.13),但每日吸烟量有显著下降(95%可信区间为2.21 - 6.36)。在职业相当的普通人群子样本中,吸烟率有显著下降(3.5%,P = 0.06),但吸烟量没有显著变化。

结论

爱尔兰的无烟工作场所立法伴随着酒吧工作人员和普通人群子样本吸烟率的下降。

相似文献

1
The effect of the Irish smoke-free workplace legislation on smoking among bar workers.
Eur J Public Health. 2009 Apr;19(2):206-11. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp008.
2
Prevalence of smoking among bar workers prior to the Republic of Ireland smokefree workplace legislation.
Ir J Med Sci. 2008 Dec;177(4):309-16. doi: 10.1007/s11845-008-0196-1. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
4
Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study.
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38636.499225.55. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
6
Effects of the Irish smoking ban on respiratory health of bar workers and air quality in Dublin pubs.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 15;175(8):840-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200608-1085OC. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
7
Bar workers' exposure to second-hand smoke: the effect of Scottish smoke-free legislation on occupational exposure.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 Oct;51(7):571-80. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mem044. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
8
Responding to change: how did bar workers adapt to the smoke-free legislation in Scotland?
Int J Environ Health Res. 2010 Feb;20(1):13-26. doi: 10.1080/09603120903255279.

引用本文的文献

3
Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 4;2(2):CD005992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub3.
5
Impact of tobacco control interventions on smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence: a systematic review.
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:961724. doi: 10.1155/2012/961724. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
6
A cost-effectiveness analysis of India's 2008 prohibition of smoking in public places in Gujarat.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 May;8(5):1271-86. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8051271. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
7
Determinants of smoking initiation among women in five European countries: a cross-sectional survey.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 17;10:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-74.
8
Home and workplace smoking bans in Italy, Ireland, Sweden, France and the Czech Republic.
Eur Respir J. 2010 May;35(5):969-79. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00066809. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
9
Are there health benefits associated with comprehensive smoke-free laws.
Int J Public Health. 2009;54(6):367-78. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-0089-8. Epub 2009 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of smoking among bar workers prior to the Republic of Ireland smokefree workplace legislation.
Ir J Med Sci. 2008 Dec;177(4):309-16. doi: 10.1007/s11845-008-0196-1. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
2
Changes in smoking among restaurant and bar employees following Norway's comprehensive smoking ban.
Health Promot Int. 2008 Mar;23(1):5-15. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam041. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
3
4
Air pollution in Boston bars before and after a smoking ban.
BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 27;6:266. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-266.
6
Effects of new smoking regulations in Italy.
Ann Oncol. 2006 Feb;17(2):346-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj070. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
7
Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study.
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38636.499225.55. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
8
The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 Jul-Aug;10(4):338-53. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200407000-00011.
9
The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know?
Health Educ Res. 2003 Oct;18(5):592-609. doi: 10.1093/her/cyf045.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验