Gupta Rupa, Duff Melissa C, Denburg Natalie L, Cohen Neal J, Bechara Antoine, Tranel Daniel
Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, United States.
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jun;47(7):1686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
Previous studies have reported conflicting evidence concerning the contribution of declarative memory to advantageous decision-making on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). One study, in which the measurement of psychophysiology during the task necessitated a 10-s delay between card selections, found that six participants with amnesia due to hippocampal damage failed to develop a preference for advantageous decks over disadvantageous decks [Gutbrod, K., Krouzel, C., Hofer, H., Muri, R., Perrig, W., & Ptak, R. (2006). Decision-making in amnesia: Do advantageous decisions require conscious knowledge of previous behavioural choices? Neuropsychologia, 44(8), 1315-1324]. However, a single-case study (where psychophysiology was not measured and no delay between card selections occurred) showed that an amnesic patient developed normal preference for advantageous decks [Turnbull, O. H., & Evans, C. E. (2006). Preserved complex emotion-based learning in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 300-306]. We sought to resolve these discrepant findings by examining IGT performances in five patients with profound amnesia (WMS-III General Memory Index M=63) and bilateral hippocampal damage caused by anoxia (n=4) or herpes simplex encephalitis (n=1). In one administration of the IGT, psychophysiology measurements were utilized and a 6-s delay was interposed between card selections. In a second administration, no delay between card selections was interposed. While age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy comparison participants showed significant learning with a gradual preference for advantageous decks in both conditions, amnesic patients, irrespective of IGT administration condition and extent of medial temporal lobe damage, failed to develop this preference. These findings strongly discount the possibility that the delay between card selections explains why amnesic participants fail to learn in the IGT, and suggest instead a significant role for medial temporal lobe declarative memory systems in the type of complex decision-making tapped by the IGT.
先前的研究报告了关于陈述性记忆对爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)中有利决策的贡献的相互矛盾的证据。一项研究在任务期间进行心理生理学测量时,卡片选择之间需要10秒的延迟,该研究发现六名因海马体损伤而失忆的参与者未能形成对有利牌组相对于不利牌组的偏好[古特布罗德,K.,克鲁泽尔,C.,霍费尔,H.,穆里,R.,佩里格,W.,& 普塔克,R.(2006年)。失忆症患者的决策:有利的决策是否需要对先前行为选择的有意识认知?《神经心理学》,44(8),1315 - 1324]。然而,一项单病例研究(未测量心理生理学且卡片选择之间没有延迟)表明一名失忆症患者对有利牌组形成了正常的偏好[特恩布尔,O. H.,& 埃文斯,C. E.(20年)。失忆症患者中基于复杂情感的学习得以保留。《神经心理学》,44(2),300 - 306]。我们试图通过检查五名患有严重失忆症(韦氏记忆量表第三版总体记忆指数M = 63)且因缺氧(n = 4)或单纯疱疹性脑炎(n = 1)导致双侧海马体损伤的患者的IGT表现来解决这些相互矛盾的发现。在IGT的一次施测中,使用了心理生理学测量,并且在卡片选择之间插入了6秒的延迟。在第二次施测中,卡片选择之间没有插入延迟。虽然年龄、性别和教育程度匹配的健康对照参与者在两种情况下都表现出显著的学习,逐渐偏好有利牌组,但失忆症患者,无论IGT施测条件和内侧颞叶损伤程度如何,都未能形成这种偏好。这些发现有力地排除了卡片选择之间的延迟解释失忆症参与者在IGT中未能学习的可能性,反而表明内侧颞叶陈述性记忆系统在IGT所涉及的复杂决策类型中起着重要作用。