• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.12%和0.2%洗必泰含漱液对唾液细菌的体内持续性。

In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Calle Entrerrios s/n, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):397-402. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0320-2. Epub 2009 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-009-0320-2
PMID:19662444
Abstract

The in vivo antimicrobial activity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) on the salivary flora up to 7 h after its application, using epifluorescence microscopy with the SYTO 9/propidium iodide dual staining, was evaluated. Fifteen volunteers performed a single mouthrinse with sterile water (SM-water), a single mouthrinse with 0.12% CHX (0.12% SM-CHX) and a single and double mouthrinse with 0.2% CHX (0.2% SM-CHX and 0.2% DM-CHX). Samples of saliva were taken at 30 s, and 1, 3, 5, and 7 h after each application. In comparison with SM-water, 0.2% CHX (SM and DM) showed a significant antibacterial effect up to 7 h after the mouthrinse, whereas this effect only persisted up to 5 h after the 0.12% SM-CHX mouthrinse. On comparing the two concentrations of CHX, significantly higher percentages of bacterial vitality were observed in all the saliva samples after the use of 0.12% CHX than after 0.2% CHX. On comparison of the 0.2% SM-CHX and 0.2% DM-CHX, significantly higher percentages of live bacteria were observed in the saliva samples taken at 1, 3, 5, and 7 h after the single mouthrinse compared with the double mouthrinse. The 0.2% CHX mouthrinse had the greatest antimicrobial activity on the salivary flora up to 7 h after its application, with a progressive recovery in bacterial vitality. The differences observed with respect to the 0.12% CHX mouthrinse demonstrate the influence of the concentration on its immediate antimicrobial activity and substantivity.

摘要

采用 SYTO 9/碘化丙啶双重染色的荧光显微镜法,评估了应用 0.12%和 0.2%洗必泰(CHX)后 7 小时内其对唾液菌群的体内抗菌活性。15 名志愿者分别使用无菌水(SM-水)、0.12% CHX(0.12% SM-CHX)进行单次漱口,以及 0.2% CHX(0.2% SM-CHX 和 0.2% DM-CHX)进行单次和双次漱口。在每次应用后 30s 及 1、3、5 和 7h 采集唾液样本。与 SM-水相比,0.2% CHX(SM 和 DM)在漱口后 7h 内表现出显著的抗菌作用,而 0.12% SM-CHX 漱口后仅能持续 5h。比较两种浓度的 CHX,在使用 0.12% CHX 后所有唾液样本中观察到的细菌活力百分比均显著高于使用 0.2% CHX 后。在比较 0.2% SM-CHX 和 0.2% DM-CHX 时,与双次漱口相比,单次漱口后 1、3、5 和 7h 采集的唾液样本中活细菌的百分比明显更高。0.2% CHX 漱口在应用后 7 小时内对唾液菌群具有最大的抗菌活性,且细菌活力呈逐渐恢复趋势。与 0.12% CHX 漱口相比,观察到的差异表明,浓度对其即刻抗菌活性和持续性有影响。

相似文献

1
In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria.0.12%和0.2%洗必泰含漱液对唾液细菌的体内持续性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):397-402. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0320-2. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
2
Evaluation of chlorhexidine substantivity on salivary flora by epifluorescence microscopy.通过落射荧光显微镜评估洗必泰对唾液菌群的持续性。
Oral Dis. 2009 Sep;15(6):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01570.x. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
3
In situ chlorhexidine substantivity on saliva and plaque-like biofilm: influence of circadian rhythm.唾液和菌斑样生物膜中氯己定的原位持续性:昼夜节律的影响。
J Periodontol. 2013 Nov;84(11):1662-72. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120475. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
4
Evaluation of the substantivity in saliva of different forms of application of chlorhexidine.不同应用形式的氯己定在唾液中的持续性评估。
Quintessence Int. 2009 Feb;40(2):141-4.
5
Substantivity of a single chlorhexidine mouthwash on salivary flora: influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors.单支洗必泰含漱液对唾液菌群的固有性:内在和外在因素的影响。
J Dent. 2010 Jul;38(7):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
6
Chlorhexidine substantivity on salivary flora and plaque-like biofilm: an in situ model.氯己定在唾液菌群和菌斑样生物膜上的持留性:原位模型。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 27;8(12):e83522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083522. eCollection 2013.
7
Effect of a neutralising agent on the evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine on the bacterial salivary flora.一种中和剂对洗必泰对唾液细菌菌群抗菌活性评估的影响。
Arch Oral Biol. 2008 Oct;53(10):981-4. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
8
In situ neutralisation of the antibacterial effect of 0.2% Chlorhexidine on salivary microbiota: Quantification of substantivity.原位中和0.2%氯己定对唾液微生物群的抗菌作用:固着性的定量分析
Arch Oral Biol. 2015 Aug;60(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
9
In vivo bactericidal effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine but not 0.12% on salivary obligate anaerobes.0.2%洗必泰对唾液专性厌氧菌有体内杀菌作用,而0.12%的洗必泰则没有。
Arch Oral Biol. 2008 Dec;53(12):1186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
10
Differences in antimicrobial activity of four commercial 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations: an in vitro contact test and salivary bacterial counts study.四种市售0.12%氯己定漱口水制剂抗菌活性的差异:一项体外接触试验和唾液细菌计数研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Apr;30(4):307-14. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00341.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Antiseptic Formulations on Oral Microbiota and Related Systemic Diseases: A Scoping Review.抗菌制剂对口腔微生物群及相关全身性疾病的影响:一项范围综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;14(8):815. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14080815.
2
Insights Into the Mechanism of Action of Chlorhexidine on .对洗必泰作用机制的见解 。 你提供的原文似乎不完整,后面缺少具体内容。
Int J Dent. 2025 Feb 27;2025:1492069. doi: 10.1155/ijod/1492069. eCollection 2025.
3
Randomised-crossover clinical trial on the substantivity of a single application of a gel containing chlorhexidine and o-cymen-5-ol on the oral biofilm and saliva.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of chlorhexidine substantivity on salivary flora by epifluorescence microscopy.通过落射荧光显微镜评估洗必泰对唾液菌群的持续性。
Oral Dis. 2009 Sep;15(6):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01570.x. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
2
Evaluation of the substantivity in saliva of different forms of application of chlorhexidine.不同应用形式的氯己定在唾液中的持续性评估。
Quintessence Int. 2009 Feb;40(2):141-4.
3
In vivo bactericidal effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine but not 0.12% on salivary obligate anaerobes.0.2%洗必泰对唾液专性厌氧菌有体内杀菌作用,而0.12%的洗必泰则没有。
含洗必泰与对伞花烃-5-醇凝胶一次应用于口腔生物膜和唾液的持留性的随机交叉临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 19;24(1):1247. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05042-7.
4
The impact of a-tomatine on shear bonding strength in different dentin types and on cariogenic microorganisms: an in vitro and in silico study.番茄苷对不同牙本质类型和致龋微生物剪切粘结强度的影响:一项体外和计算机模拟研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):1220. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05001-2.
5
Expert consensus on endodontic therapy for patients with systemic conditions.口腔内科学专家共识:系统性疾病患者的牙髓病治疗。
Int J Oral Sci. 2024 Jun 17;16(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00312-0.
6
Preprocedural Viral Load Effects of Oral Antiseptics on SARS-CoV-2 in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review.口腔消毒剂对新冠肺炎患者严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的术前病毒载量影响:一项系统评价。
Biomedicines. 2023 Jun 12;11(6):1694. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061694.
7
Antimicrobial oral lavage reduces the SARS-CoV-2 load in intubated patients: randomized clinical trial.抗菌口腔灌洗可降低插管患者的新冠病毒载量:随机临床试验
J Oral Microbiol. 2022 Dec 13;15(1):2152179. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2022.2152179. eCollection 2023.
8
Role of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Oral Rinses in Managing Periodontitis.洗必泰与中草药漱口水在牙周炎治疗中的作用。
Int Dent J. 2023 Apr;73(2):235-242. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.06.027. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
9
Chlorhexidine rinsing inhibits biofilm formation and causes biofilm disruption on dental enamel in situ.氯己定冲洗可抑制牙釉质表面生物膜的形成,并破坏已形成的生物膜。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Nov;24(11):3843-3853. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03250-3. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
and Interaction in Dual-Species Biofilm.以及双物种生物膜中的相互作用。
Microorganisms. 2020 Jan 31;8(2):194. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020194.
Arch Oral Biol. 2008 Dec;53(12):1186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
4
Chlorhexidine: expanding the armamentarium for infection control and prevention.洗必泰:拓展感染控制与预防的手段
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 15;46(2):274-81. doi: 10.1086/524736.
5
Effects of low dose chlorhexidine mouthrinses on oral bacteria and salivary microflora including those producing hydrogen sulfide.低剂量洗必泰漱口水对口腔细菌和唾液微生物群的影响,包括那些产生硫化氢的微生物群。
Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004 Oct;19(5):309-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.2004.00160.x.
6
Effect of various chlorhexidine regimens on salivary bacteria and de novo plaque formation.不同洗必泰方案对唾液细菌和新发牙菌斑形成的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Oct;30(10):919-25. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00420.x.
7
Differences in antimicrobial activity of four commercial 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations: an in vitro contact test and salivary bacterial counts study.四种市售0.12%氯己定漱口水制剂抗菌活性的差异:一项体外接触试验和唾液细菌计数研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Apr;30(4):307-14. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00341.x.
8
The clinical and microbiological effects of a novel acidified sodium chlorite mouthrinse on oral bacterial mucosal infections.
Oral Dis. 2001 Sep;7(5):276-80. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2001.3600746a.x.
9
Antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptic mouthrinse solutions.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Apr;55(2):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s002280050601.
10
An approach to differentiate between antibacterial and antiadhesive effects of mouthrinses in vivo.
Arch Oral Biol. 1998 Jul;43(7):559-65. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(98)00032-6.