• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单支洗必泰含漱液对唾液菌群的固有性:内在和外在因素的影响。

Substantivity of a single chlorhexidine mouthwash on salivary flora: influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Spain.

出版信息

J Dent. 2010 Jul;38(7):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.012
PMID:20380865
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the in vivo antimicrobial activity of a chlorhexidine (CHX) digluconate mouthwash on the salivary flora up to 7h after its application, using epifluorescence microscopy.

METHODS

Ten volunteers performed the following mouthwashes: 0.12% CHX (10ml/30s, 15ml/30s and 10ml/1min); 0.2% CHX (10ml/30s, 15ml/30s and 10ml/1min); 0.2% CHX (10ml/30s) plus different daily activities (eating, drinking, chewing or smoking).

RESULTS

On comparing 0.12% CHX (10ml versus 15ml), the greatest differences in bacterial viability were detected at 1h and 3h. On comparing 0.12% CHX (30s versus 1min) the greatest differences in viability were detected at 1h, 3h, and 5h; and with 0.2% CHX (30s versus 1min), at 5h and 7h. On comparing 0.12% CHX (15ml) versus 0.2% CHX (10ml) and 0.12% CHX (1min) versus 0.2% CHX (30s), the percentage of viable bacteria was higher with the 0.12% concentration. On comparing 0.2% CHX versus 0.2% CHX plus daily activities, the higher differences were detected after eating and chewing, followed by drinking.

CONCLUSION

An increase in the volume of 0.12% or 0.2% CHX mouthwashes does not affect the duration of antimicrobial activity in saliva, whereas increasing the duration produces a marked increase in substantivity. Substantivity was greater with 0.2% CHX than 0.12% CHX. Eating, chewing or drinking significantly reduces the 0.2% CHX substantivity in saliva.

摘要

目的

使用荧光显微镜分析内在和外在因素对氯己定(CHX)葡萄糖酸盐漱口水在应用后 7 小时内唾液菌群的体内抗菌活性的影响。

方法

10 名志愿者进行以下漱口:0.12% CHX(10ml/30s,15ml/30s 和 10ml/1min);0.2% CHX(10ml/30s,15ml/30s 和 10ml/1min);0.2% CHX(10ml/30s)加不同的日常活动(进食、饮水、咀嚼或吸烟)。

结果

比较 0.12% CHX(10ml 与 15ml)时,在 1 小时和 3 小时检测到最大的细菌活力差异。比较 0.12% CHX(30s 与 1min)时,在 1 小时、3 小时和 5 小时检测到最大的活力差异;0.2% CHX(30s 与 1min)时,在 5 小时和 7 小时检测到最大的活力差异。比较 0.12% CHX(15ml)与 0.2% CHX(10ml)和 0.12% CHX(1min)与 0.2% CHX(30s)时,0.12%浓度的活菌百分比更高。比较 0.2% CHX 与 0.2% CHX 加日常活动时,进食和咀嚼后差异较大,其次是饮水。

结论

增加 0.12%或 0.2% CHX 漱口水的体积不会影响唾液中抗菌活性的持续时间,而增加持续时间会显著增加持续性。0.2% CHX 的持续性大于 0.12% CHX。进食、咀嚼或饮水会显著降低唾液中 0.2% CHX 的持续性。

相似文献

1
Substantivity of a single chlorhexidine mouthwash on salivary flora: influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors.单支洗必泰含漱液对唾液菌群的固有性:内在和外在因素的影响。
J Dent. 2010 Jul;38(7):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
2
In situ chlorhexidine substantivity on saliva and plaque-like biofilm: influence of circadian rhythm.唾液和菌斑样生物膜中氯己定的原位持续性:昼夜节律的影响。
J Periodontol. 2013 Nov;84(11):1662-72. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120475. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
3
In situ neutralisation of the antibacterial effect of 0.2% Chlorhexidine on salivary microbiota: Quantification of substantivity.原位中和0.2%氯己定对唾液微生物群的抗菌作用:固着性的定量分析
Arch Oral Biol. 2015 Aug;60(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
4
Evaluation of the substantivity in saliva of different forms of application of chlorhexidine.不同应用形式的氯己定在唾液中的持续性评估。
Quintessence Int. 2009 Feb;40(2):141-4.
5
In vivo bactericidal effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine but not 0.12% on salivary obligate anaerobes.0.2%洗必泰对唾液专性厌氧菌有体内杀菌作用,而0.12%的洗必泰则没有。
Arch Oral Biol. 2008 Dec;53(12):1186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
6
In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria.0.12%和0.2%洗必泰含漱液对唾液细菌的体内持续性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):397-402. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0320-2. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
7
Evaluation of chlorhexidine substantivity on salivary flora by epifluorescence microscopy.通过落射荧光显微镜评估洗必泰对唾液菌群的持续性。
Oral Dis. 2009 Sep;15(6):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01570.x. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
8
Effect of a neutralising agent on the evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine on the bacterial salivary flora.一种中和剂对洗必泰对唾液细菌菌群抗菌活性评估的影响。
Arch Oral Biol. 2008 Oct;53(10):981-4. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
9
Chlorhexidine substantivity on salivary flora and plaque-like biofilm: an in situ model.氯己定在唾液菌群和菌斑样生物膜上的持留性:原位模型。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 27;8(12):e83522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083522. eCollection 2013.
10
Comparative effects of different chlorhexidine mouth-rinse formulations on volatile sulphur compounds and salivary bacterial counts.不同洗必泰漱口水配方对挥发性硫化物和唾液细菌计数的比较效果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1128-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00621.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomised-crossover clinical trial on the substantivity of a single application of a gel containing chlorhexidine and o-cymen-5-ol on the oral biofilm and saliva.含洗必泰与对伞花烃-5-醇凝胶一次应用于口腔生物膜和唾液的持留性的随机交叉临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 19;24(1):1247. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05042-7.
2
Quantitative analysis of the effects of brushing, flossing, and mouthrinsing on supragingival and subgingival plaque microbiota: 12-week clinical trial.刷牙、使用牙线和漱口对龈上和龈下菌斑微生物群影响的定量分析:为期 12 周的临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 17;24(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04362-y.
3
Inhibitory Activity of Antibacterial Mouthwashes and Antiseptic Substances against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
抗菌漱口水和防腐物质对淋病奈瑟菌的抑制活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jun 21;66(6):e0004222. doi: 10.1128/aac.00042-22. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review.聚己二胍和二氧化氯可否替代洗必泰?系统评价。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Jan-Feb;140(1):42-55. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0776.R1.18052021.
5
Sub-Inhibitory Concentrations of Chlorhexidine Induce Resistance to Chlorhexidine and Decrease Antibiotic Susceptibility in .洗必泰的亚抑菌浓度会诱导对洗必泰的耐药性并降低其对……的抗生素敏感性。 (原文句末不完整,翻译只能到此)
Front Microbiol. 2021 Nov 25;12:776909. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.776909. eCollection 2021.
6
Synthesis, Drug Release, and Antibacterial Properties of Novel Dendritic CHX-SrCl and CHX-ZnCl Particles.新型树枝状CHX-SrCl和CHX-ZnCl颗粒的合成、药物释放及抗菌性能
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Oct 27;13(11):1799. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111799.
7
First insights into chlorhexidine retention in the oral cavity after application of different regimens.不同方案应用后口腔内洗必泰的留置初步观察。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6109-6118. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03910-y. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
8
Antiviral mouthwashes: possible benefit for COVID-19 with evidence-based approach.抗病毒漱口水:基于循证方法对新冠病毒病可能具有的益处。
J Oral Microbiol. 2020 Jul 17;12(1):1794363. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1794363.
9
Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms.漱口水对含有嗜酸乳杆菌的实验性口腔生物膜的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Sep 1;8(3):96. doi: 10.3390/dj8030096.
10
The development of mouthwashes without anti-gonococcal activity for controlled clinical trials: an in vitro study.用于对照临床试验的无抗淋球菌活性漱口水的研发:一项体外研究。
F1000Res. 2019 Sep 11;8:1620. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20399.2. eCollection 2019.