• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉和听觉语境编码的神经相关性分离。

Dissociation of the neural correlates of visual and auditory contextual encoding.

机构信息

Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3800, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.019.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.019
PMID:19720071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2795095/
Abstract

The present study contrasted the neural correlates of encoding item-context associations according to whether the contextual information was visual or auditory. Subjects (N=20) underwent fMRI scanning while studying a series of visually presented pictures, each of which co-occurred with either a visually or an auditorily presented name. The task requirement was to judge whether the name corresponded to the presented object. In a subsequent memory test subjects judged whether test pictures were studied or unstudied and, for items judged as studied, indicated the presentation modality of the associated name. Dissociable cortical regions demonstrating increased activity for visual vs. auditory trials (and vice versa) were identified. A subset of these modality-selective regions also showed modality-selective subsequent source memory effects, that is, enhanced responses on trials associated with correct modality judgments relative to those for which modality or item memory later failed. These findings constitute direct evidence for the proposal that successful encoding of a contextual feature is associated with enhanced activity in the cortical regions engaged during the on-line processing of that feature. In addition, successful encoding of visual objects within auditory contexts was associated with more extensive engagement of the hippocampus and adjacent medial temporal cortex than was the encoding of such objects within visual contexts. This raises the possibility that the encoding of across-modality item-context associations places more demands on the hippocampus than does the encoding of within-modality associations.

摘要

本研究对比了根据语境信息是视觉的还是听觉的,对项目-语境关联进行编码的神经相关性。(主语)20 名被试在进行 fMRI 扫描时,学习了一系列视觉呈现的图片,每张图片都与视觉或听觉呈现的名称同时出现。任务要求是判断名称是否与呈现的对象相对应。在随后的记忆测试中,被试判断测试图片是否被学习过,如果被判断为学习过的项目,则指示相关名称的呈现方式。确定了表现出与视觉试验相比(反之亦然)活动增加的可分离皮质区域。这些模态选择性区域的一部分也表现出模态选择性的后续来源记忆效应,即在与正确模态判断相关的试验上的反应增强,而在模态或项目记忆后来失败的试验上的反应减弱。这些发现构成了直接证据,表明成功编码语境特征与在线处理该特征期间参与的皮质区域的活动增强有关。此外,与在视觉语境中编码此类对象相比,在听觉语境中成功编码视觉对象与海马体和相邻的内侧颞叶皮层的更广泛参与有关。这提出了一种可能性,即跨模态项目-语境关联的编码比模态内关联的编码对海马体的要求更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6346/2795095/34a0f71ce742/nihms142502f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6346/2795095/d1a3b140c8a5/nihms142502f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6346/2795095/b39d6189bc56/nihms142502f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6346/2795095/34a0f71ce742/nihms142502f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6346/2795095/d1a3b140c8a5/nihms142502f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6346/2795095/b39d6189bc56/nihms142502f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6346/2795095/34a0f71ce742/nihms142502f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Dissociation of the neural correlates of visual and auditory contextual encoding.视觉和听觉语境编码的神经相关性分离。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.019.
2
Neural correlates of the encoding of multimodal contextual features.多模态上下文特征编码的神经关联。
Learn Mem. 2012 Nov 19;19(12):605-14. doi: 10.1101/lm.027631.112.
3
Neural correlates of encoding within- and across-domain inter-item associations.编码跨域内和跨域项目间联想的神经关联。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2533-43. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21611. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
4
Effects of modality on the neural correlates of encoding processes supporting recollection and familiarity.模态对支持回忆和熟悉的编码过程的神经相关物的影响。
Learn Mem. 2011 Aug 18;18(9):565-73. doi: 10.1101/lm.2197211. Print 2011 Sep.
5
Cortical pattern separation and item-specific memory encoding.皮质模式分离与特定项目记忆编码。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 May;85:256-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
6
Stimulus content and the neural correlates of source memory.刺激内容与源记忆的神经关联。
Brain Res. 2011 Feb 10;1373(2):110-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.086. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
7
Amygdala activity is associated with the successful encoding of item, but not source, information for positive and negative stimuli.杏仁核活动与对正面和负面刺激的项目信息(而非来源信息)的成功编码相关。
J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2564-70. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5241-05.2006.
8
fMRI correlates of retrieval orientation.检索取向的功能磁共振成像相关因素
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(8):1425-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Feb 9.
9
A role for perirhinal cortex in memory for novel object-context associations.前额皮质在记忆新颖的物体-情境关联中的作用。
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 28;32(13):4473-81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5751-11.2012.
10
The effect of object processing in content-dependent source memory.客体加工对基于内容的源记忆的影响。
BMC Neurosci. 2013 Jul 13;14:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating frontoparietal network topography for diagnostic markers of Alzheimer's disease.评估额顶叶网络拓扑结构以寻找阿尔茨海默病的诊断标志物。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):14135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64699-w.
2
The hearing hippocampus.听觉海马体。
Prog Neurobiol. 2022 Nov;218:102326. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102326. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
3
Representing the Good and Bad: fMRI signatures during the encoding of multisensory positive, negative, and neutral events.呈现好坏:多感觉正性、负性和中性事件编码时 fMRI 的特征。

本文引用的文献

1
Memory and Working-with-Memory: A Component Process Model Based on Modules and Central Systems.记忆与工作记忆:基于模块和中央系统的成分加工模型。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1992 Summer;4(3):257-67. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.257.
2
Selecting for memory? The influence of selective attention on the mnemonic binding of contextual information.为记忆而选择?选择性注意对情境信息记忆绑定的影响。
J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 24;29(25):8270-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1043-09.2009.
3
Activity in the medial temporal lobe predicts memory strength, whereas activity in the prefrontal cortex predicts recollection.
Cortex. 2022 Jun;151:240-258. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
The Retrieval-Related Anterior Shift Is Moderated by Age and Correlates with Memory Performance.检索相关的前移位受年龄调节,并与记忆表现相关。
J Neurosci. 2022 Mar 2;42(9):1765-1776. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1763-21.2021. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
5
Examining the influence of brain stimulation to the medial prefrontal cortex on the self-reference effect in memory.考察对内侧前额叶皮层的脑刺激对记忆中自我参照效应的影响。
Brain Behav. 2021 Dec;11(12):e2368. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2368. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
6
Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.通过对强化事件的偶然记忆来评估刺激-控制联想的学习。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(10):1599-1621. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001058. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
The effect of value on long-term associative memory.价值对长期联想记忆的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Dec;74(12):2033-2045. doi: 10.1177/17470218211014439. Epub 2021 May 15.
8
Effects of age on goal-dependent modulation of episodic memory retrieval.年龄对情景记忆提取的目标依赖调节的影响。
Neurobiol Aging. 2021 Jun;102:73-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
9
Neural Differentiation is Moderated by Age in Scene-Selective, But Not Face-Selective, Cortical Regions.在场景选择性而非面孔选择性的皮层区域,神经分化受到年龄的调节。
eNeuro. 2020 May 21;7(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0142-20.2020. Print 2020 May/Jun.
10
Age differences in the neural correlates of the specificity of recollection: An event-related potential study.年龄对再认特异性的神经相关性差异:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Mar 16;140:107394. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107394. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
内侧颞叶的活动可预测记忆强度,而前额叶皮质的活动则可预测回忆。
J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10541-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3456-08.2008.
4
Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study.视觉意象与动觉意象过程中的脑活动:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jul;30(7):2157-72. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20658.
5
Why is the meaning of a sentence better remembered than its form? An fMRI study on the role of novelty-encoding processes.为什么句子的含义比其形式更容易被记住?一项关于新颖性编码过程作用的功能磁共振成像研究。
Hippocampus. 2008;18(9):909-18. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20453.
6
Effects of study task on the neural correlates of source encoding.学习任务对源编码神经关联的影响。
Learn Mem. 2008 May 29;15(6):417-25. doi: 10.1101/lm.878908. Print 2008 Jun.
7
Superior temporal sulcus--It's my area: or is it?颞上沟——这是我的研究领域:还是说并非如此?
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Dec;20(12):2125-36. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20148.
8
Encoding-retrieval overlap in human episodic memory: a functional neuroimaging perspective.人类情景记忆中的编码-提取重叠:功能性神经影像学视角
Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:339-52. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00021-0.
9
Selective and shared contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to episodic item and associative encoding.海马体和嗅周皮层对情景项目及联想编码的选择性和共享性贡献。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1478-89. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20104.
10
Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex.人类视觉皮层中用于物体信息的两个层次组织的神经系统。
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Feb;11(2):224-31. doi: 10.1038/nn2036. Epub 2008 Jan 13.