• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良前列腺尖部解剖在腹腔镜前列腺根治术中对早期控尿的影响:技术与初步结果。

Modified apical dissection of the prostate improves early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and initial results.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Number 600, Tianhe Road, 510630, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr;136(4):511-6. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0683-4. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00432-009-0683-4
PMID:19774396
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) is one of the greatest worries for all patients. One of the possible reasons for this urinary incontinence is a postoperative deficiency of the external striated urethral sphincter (EUS) complex and continence nerves. This study evaluated the application of a modified simple technique to dissection of the apical prostate in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and assessed the rate of urinary continence.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients were randomly selected using envelopes and enrolled in this study. A standard LRP was performed in 52 patients (standard LRP group) and a modified technique for simple dissection of the apical prostate in LRP was performed in another 52 patients (modified LRP group). The urethra was dissected and transected at the apex of the prostate, proximal to the nerve-distributing rhabdosphincter using sharp scissors to avoid damage to the EUS complex and continence nerves. In all patients, a pad test was performed on 3, 30 and 90 days postoperatively and correlated with urinary continence. Continence was defined as zero pads or a liner used for security reasons only.

RESULTS

After catheter removal, the continence rates were regained in 66, 85 and 96% of patients in the modified LRP group compared with 28, 55 and 91% of the patients in the standard LRP group at 3, 30 and 90 days, respectively. A statistically significant difference was present at 3 and 30 days (p < 0.01, respectively). At 90 days, the difference, although still present, was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study, the technique of simplified apical dissection of the prostate in LRP appears to be an easy and feasible technique in early recovery of urinary continence. Further long-term and larger sample studies are necessary to elucidate the modified technique in LRP on early restoration of urinary continence.

摘要

目的

根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)后尿失禁是所有患者最担心的问题之一。这种尿失禁的一个可能原因是术后外横纹尿道括约肌(EUS)复合体和控尿神经的缺陷。本研究评估了改良的简单技术在腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)中对前列腺尖部解剖的应用,并评估了控尿率。

方法

采用信封法随机选择 104 例患者纳入本研究。52 例患者行标准 LRP(标准 LRP 组),另 52 例患者行改良 LRP 简单前列腺尖部解剖术(改良 LRP 组)。在靠近神经分布的横纹肌处,用锐利的剪刀锐性解剖和切断尿道,避免损伤 EUS 复合体和控尿神经。所有患者均在术后 3、30 和 90 天进行垫试验,并与控尿情况相关联。控尿定义为零垫或仅出于安全原因使用衬垫。

结果

拔除导尿管后,改良 LRP 组患者的控尿率分别在 3、30 和 90 天恢复至 66%、85%和 96%,而标准 LRP 组患者的控尿率分别为 28%、55%和 91%。3 天和 30 天差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。90 天时,差异虽然仍然存在,但无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。

结论

在这项初步研究中,LRP 中简化前列腺尖部解剖的技术似乎是一种简单可行的技术,可以早期恢复尿控。需要进一步的长期和更大样本的研究来阐明 LRP 中改良技术对早期恢复尿控的作用。

相似文献

1
Modified apical dissection of the prostate improves early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and initial results.改良前列腺尖部解剖在腹腔镜前列腺根治术中对早期控尿的影响:技术与初步结果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr;136(4):511-6. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0683-4. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析报告机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控恢复的研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
3
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
4
Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature.根治性前列腺切除术后的后肌筋膜重建:文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):779-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.041. Epub 2012 May 30.
5
Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.耻骨后、腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:比较研究的系统评价与累积分析
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25.
6
Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.保留神经血管束与根治性前列腺切除术后控尿时间的改善相关,但与长期控尿率无关:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):692-704. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
7
Continence criteria of 193 618 patients after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.193618 例开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的控尿标准。
BJU Int. 2024 Jul;134(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/bju.16180. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
Effect of a Modified Technique of Posterior Reconstruction by Iliopectineal Ligament Suspension During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy on Early Continence: A Randomised Controlled Trial.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中改良髂耻韧带悬吊后重建技术对早期控尿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Urology. 2024 Nov;193:116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.07.028. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
9
Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术中双侧与单侧保留神经对尿控的影响是否存在差异?系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 23;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03340-6.
10
Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):930-937. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Can a nomogram predict apical prostate cancer pathology upgrade from fusion biopsy to final pathology? A multicenter study.是否可以通过融合活检到最终病理的Nomogram 预测前列腺癌的尖部升级?一项多中心研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jun;13(11):e7341. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7341.
2
Pelvic Floor Reconstruction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Surgical Techniques.根治性前列腺切除术后的盆底重建:不同手术技术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 2;7(1):2737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02991-8.
3
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy plus extended lymph nodes dissection for cases with non-extra node metastatic prostate cancer: 5-year experience in a single Chinese institution.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.克服解剖学缺陷的手术技术:根据术前磁共振成像平衡前列腺切除术后尿道括约肌长度的控尿效果
J Urol. 2008 May;179(5):1907-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.036. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
2
Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes.机器人根治性前列腺切除术:长期疗效
Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Mar;18(2):173-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f517d6.
3
Transition from open to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术联合扩大淋巴结清扫术治疗非淋巴结转移前列腺癌:单中心 5 年经验。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 May;139(5):871-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-013-1395-3. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
4
Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.单中心研究比较标准的顶端解剖与改良技术,以促进腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中的膀胱-尿道吻合。
Asian J Androl. 2011 May;13(3):494-8. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.110. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
BJU Int. 2008 Mar;101(6):667-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07440.x.
4
Comparative study of the impact of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.3个月与8个月新辅助激素治疗对腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术结局影响的比较研究
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug;133(8):555-62. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0204-2. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
5
Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter.开放性根治性前列腺切除术后横纹括约肌后部修复后早期控尿功能恢复
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):376-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.109. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
6
Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy.横纹括约肌的后重建术可使经腹腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后控尿功能迅速恢复。
Eur Urol. 2007 Apr;51(4):996-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.014. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
7
Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy.根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后横纹括约肌后方结构的修复可缩短控尿时间。
J Urol. 2006 Jun;175(6):2201-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00262-X.
8
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:手术质量的批判性分析
Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.018. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
9
Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy--critical analysis of the results.腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术——结果的批判性分析
Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):612-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.054. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
10
Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy--effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins.保留神经的内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术——耻骨前列腺韧带保留对早期控尿和切缘阳性的影响
Eur Urol. 2006 Jan;49(1):103-11; discussion 111-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 2.