Suppr超能文献

绿地可达性、使用和身体活动:理解区域剥夺的影响。

Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: understanding the effects of area deprivation.

机构信息

Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2009 Dec;49(6):500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Oct 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand the patterning of greenspace provision and use by area deprivation, and determine how deprivation moderates relationships with physical activity.

METHODS

The responses obtained from 6821 respondents to the 2005 'The Quality of Life in your Neighbourhood Survey' undertaken in Bristol, England, were combined with objective measures of access to greenspaces. Area deprivation was determined using the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Descriptive analyses examined how mean distance, perceived greenspace access and safety, visit frequency, and physical activity varied by deprivation quartile. Logistic regression models examined how relationships were moderated by deprivation.

RESULTS

Respondents in more deprived areas lived closer to greenspaces, but reported poorer perceived accessibility, poorer safety, and less frequent use. Frequency of use declined with distance but only in the most affluent areas. Relationships between physical activity and perceived accessibility, safety, and visit frequency were moderated by deprivation.

CONCLUSIONS

The accessibility of greenspaces was better in more deprived areas but those residents had more negative perceptions and were less likely to use the greenspaces. Interventions may be most effective if they target the perceptions and needs of residents of deprived neighbourhoods.

摘要

目的

了解绿地供给和使用的模式与地区贫困程度之间的关系,并确定贫困程度如何调节与身体活动之间的关系。

方法

将英格兰布里斯托尔市于 2005 年开展的“邻里生活质量调查”中 6821 名受访者的回复与绿地可达性的客观测量数据相结合。使用多维度贫困指数确定地区贫困程度。描述性分析考察了按贫困程度四分位数划分的平均距离、感知绿地可达性和安全性、访问频率以及身体活动的变化情况。逻辑回归模型考察了贫困程度对关系的调节作用。

结果

贫困程度较高地区的受访者距离绿地更近,但他们报告的感知可达性较差、安全性较差且使用频率较低。在较富裕的地区,使用频率随距离的增加而下降,但仅在较富裕的地区。身体活动与感知可达性、安全性和访问频率之间的关系受到贫困程度的调节。

结论

贫困程度较高地区的绿地可达性更好,但这些居民对绿地的看法更负面,使用绿地的可能性也更低。如果干预措施能够针对贫困社区居民的需求和看法,那么干预措施可能会更有效。

相似文献

7
Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England.绿地、城市化与健康:英格兰地区的关系
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Aug;61(8):681-3. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.053553.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Viewpoint--Natural GreenSpace.
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jan;57(534):69.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验