Harshaw Christopher
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199.
Dev Rev. 2008 Dec 1;28(4):541-569. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2008.08.001.
Hunger, thirst and satiety have an enormous influence on cognition, behavior and development, yet we often take for granted that they are simply inborn or innate. Converging data and theory from both comparative and human domains, however, supports the conclusion that the phenomena hunger, thirst and satiety are not innate but rather emerge probabilistically as a function of experience during individual development. The metatheoretical perspective provided by developmental psychobiological systems theory provides a useful framework for organizing and synthesizing findings related to the development of the perception of hunger, thirst and satiety, or alimentary interoception. It is argued that neither developmental psychology nor the psychology of eating and drinking have adequately dealt with the ontogeny of alimentary interoception and that a more serious consideration of the species-typical developmental system of food and fluid intake and the many modifications that have been made therein is likely necessary for a full understanding of both alimentary and emotional development.
饥饿、口渴和饱腹感对认知、行为及发育有着巨大影响,但我们常常理所当然地认为它们仅仅是与生俱来的。然而,来自比较研究和人类研究领域的数据与理论逐渐汇聚,支持了这样一个结论:饥饿、口渴和饱腹感现象并非天生的,而是在个体发育过程中,作为经验的函数概率性地出现。发展心理生物学系统理论提供的元理论视角,为组织和综合与饥饿、口渴和饱腹感感知(即进食内感受)发展相关的研究结果提供了一个有用的框架。有人认为,发展心理学和饮食心理学都没有充分探讨进食内感受的个体发生,要全面理解进食和情感发展,可能有必要更认真地考虑食物和液体摄入的物种典型发展系统以及其中所做的诸多改变。