Champagne Bradley J, Delaney Conor P
Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-5047, USA.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2007 Aug;20(3):237-48. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-984868.
Laparoscopic colectomy has been proven oncologically equivalent to conventional surgery and is now generally agreed to offer patients a reduced length of stay, shorter recovery times, and improved cosmesis. In contrast, acceptance of laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer has been much delayed and the enthusiasm of early studies has met considerable skepticism. For rectal cancer, it has been demonstrated that there is considerable variation between surgeons in disease-free survival and local pelvic recurrence after open proctectomy for rectal cancer. These differences are likely to be magnified when the technical challenge of laparoscopy is added to proctectomy. Minimally invasive approaches to rectal cancer need to demonstrate equivalent oncologic outcomes and maintenance or improvement in quality of life. This review will outline the current evidence for laparoscopy as a treatment option for patients with rectal cancer, emphasize the need for standardized approaches among multidisciplinary teams, and highlight the technical details of different laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer.
腹腔镜结肠切除术已被证明在肿瘤学上等同于传统手术,目前人们普遍认为它能缩短患者的住院时间、加快恢复速度并改善美观效果。相比之下,腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的接受程度则滞后得多,早期研究的热情也遭遇了相当多的质疑。对于直肠癌,已有研究表明,在直肠癌开放切除术后,不同外科医生在无病生存率和局部盆腔复发方面存在相当大的差异。当将腹腔镜手术的技术挑战加入到直肠切除术中时,这些差异可能会被放大。直肠癌的微创治疗方法需要证明其具有同等的肿瘤学疗效,并维持或改善生活质量。本综述将概述目前关于腹腔镜作为直肠癌患者治疗选择的证据,强调多学科团队采用标准化方法的必要性,并突出不同腹腔镜直肠癌手术的技术细节。