Phoniatric Unit of the Otorhinolaryngology Department,Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo,
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Feb;267(2):171-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1176-4.
Despite the wealth of publications on the topic of gastroesophageal reflux and its variants, there are still many unsettled questions before one accepts the prevalent cult of "reflux disease". This study is summarizing the results of the critical analysis of the literature, 436 articles,during the last 30 years. The golden test to identify the patient group suffering from this rather common phenomenon is still lacking. The claimed extra-esophageal manifestations especially in the larynx are non-specific and may be caused by other factors well-known within the domain of vocology. The response to therapeutic intervention still lacks serious well-controlled studies to allow drawing reasonable conclusions. An outstanding feature of the publications is that most of them fall in the category of "review". It seems that there is a tendency to perpetuate the concept without objective criticism. Following the analysis, a recommendation for anew plan of original well-controlled multi-center studies is highlighted.
尽管有大量关于胃食管反流及其变体的出版物,但在接受普遍存在的“反流病”这一观念之前,仍有许多悬而未决的问题。本研究总结了对过去 30 年中 436 篇文献的批判性分析结果。目前仍缺乏黄金测试来确定患有这种相当普遍现象的患者群体。据称的食管外表现,特别是在喉部,是非特异性的,可能由声乐学领域内已知的其他因素引起。治疗干预的反应仍然缺乏认真的、对照良好的研究来得出合理的结论。这些出版物的一个显著特点是,它们大多属于“综述”类别。似乎有一种倾向于在没有客观批评的情况下不断延续这一概念。在分析之后,强调了一个新的、原始的、对照良好的多中心研究计划的建议。