Addy M, Jenkins S, Newcombe R
Department of Periodontology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
J Clin Periodontol. 1991 Feb;18(2):90-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1991.tb01694.x.
A number of chlorhexidine mouthwashes are available commercially which differ in formulation and regimen of use. As a comparative measure of antimicrobial persistence, this study evaluated the effect of 4 chlorhexidine mouthwash formulations on salivary bacterial counts after a single rinse. The study was a randomised single-examiner blind 5-way crossover investigation employing a panel of 10 young healthy human volunteers. The 0.12% and 0.2% commercial formulations when rinsed according to the respective manufacturers instructions produced similar large and prolonged reductions in salivary bacterial counts during the 7-h period. A 0.1% formulation also commercially available produced minimal effects on salivary bacterial counts and was little different to the saline rinse. A reformulated 0.1% rinse, not commercially available at the time of the study, produced significant salivary bacterial count reductions over the 7-h period albeit to a lesser degree of magnitude than to the 0.2% and 0.12% rinses. The results were consistent with comparative plaque inhibitory studies of the formulations and suggest that the method is a quick and simple way of screening products for antimicrobial and antiplaque potential.
市面上有多种洗必泰漱口水,其配方和使用方法各不相同。作为抗菌持久性的比较指标,本研究评估了4种洗必泰漱口水配方单次漱口后对唾液细菌计数的影响。该研究是一项随机单 examiner 盲法5组交叉调查,采用了10名年轻健康人类志愿者组成的小组。按照各自制造商的说明进行漱口时,0.12%和0.2%的市售配方在7小时内唾液细菌计数出现了类似的大幅且持久的减少。市售的0.1%配方对唾液细菌计数的影响最小,与盐水漱口差异不大。一种重新配方的0.1%漱口水在研究时未上市,在7小时内唾液细菌计数显著减少,尽管减少幅度小于0.2%和0.12%的漱口水。结果与这些配方的比较菌斑抑制研究一致,表明该方法是筛选具有抗菌和抗菌斑潜力产品的快速简单方法。