National Sport Science Quality Assurance Program, Australian Institute of Sport, Belconnen, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jun;109(3):551-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1379-9. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
Three portable blood lactate analysers, Lactate Pro (LP), Lactate Scout (LS) and Lactate Plus (L(+)), were evaluated. Analyser reliability and accuracy was assessed. For reliability, intra- and inter-analyser comparisons demonstrated that the LP (intra-TE = 0.5 mM, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) and L(+) (intra-TE = 0.4, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) displayed greater overall reliability than the LS (intra-TE = 1.0, inter-TE = 0.8 mM). At BLa < 4.0 mM, the LP (intra-TE = 0.1 mM) demonstrated greater reliability than the LS (intra-TE = 0.5 mM) and L(+) (intra-TE = 0.4 mM). At BLa > 8.0 mM, the LP (intra-TE = 0.5 mM, inter-TE = 0.4 mM) and L(+) (intra- and inter-TE = 0.4 mM) displayed greater reliability than the LS (intra-TE = 1.1 mM, inter-TE = 0.9 mM). For accuracy, the L(+) (SEE = 0.6 mM) compared more favourably to the LP than the LS (SEE = 1.1 mM). At BLa approximately 1.0-18.0 mM, the LS produced values that were up to 0.9 mM higher than the LP; the L(+) produced BLa that were within +/-0.1 mM. All portable analysers tended to under-read the ABL 700 analyser. The suitability of the LP and L(+) as accurate analysers is supported by strong correlations (r = 0.91 and r = 0.94) and limits of agreement <or=2.1 mM. This study showed that the LP and L(+), compared well to each other, displayed good reliability and accuracy when compared to a laboratory-based analyser. Although the LS also displayed relatively good reliability, it was not as reliable or accurate as the LP or L(+).
评估了三种便携式血乳酸分析仪,即 Lactate Pro(LP)、Lactate Scout(LS)和 Lactate Plus(L(+))。评估了分析仪的可靠性和准确性。就可靠性而言,内部和外部分析器比较表明,LP(内部 TE = 0.5 mM,外部 TE = 0.4 mM)和 L(+)(内部 TE = 0.4,外部 TE = 0.4 mM)比 LS(内部 TE = 1.0,外部 TE = 0.8 mM)具有更高的整体可靠性。在 BLa < 4.0 mM 时,LP(内部 TE = 0.1 mM)比 LS(内部 TE = 0.5 mM)和 L(+)(内部 TE = 0.4 mM)更可靠。在 BLa > 8.0 mM 时,LP(内部 TE = 0.5 mM,外部 TE = 0.4 mM)和 L(+)(内部和外部 TE = 0.4 mM)比 LS(内部 TE = 1.1 mM,外部 TE = 0.9 mM)更可靠。就准确性而言,L(+)(SEE = 0.6 mM)与 LP 相比,与 LS 相比具有更好的优势。在 BLa 约为 1.0-18.0 mM 时,LS 产生的值比 LP 高多达 0.9 mM;L(+) 产生的 BLa 在 +/-0.1 mM 内。所有便携式分析仪往往都低估了 ABL 700 分析仪。LP 和 L(+) 作为准确分析仪的适用性得到了强有力的相关性(r = 0.91 和 r = 0.94)和协议限制<or=2.1 mM 的支持。本研究表明,LP 和 L(+) 彼此之间表现良好,与基于实验室的分析仪相比,具有良好的可靠性和准确性。尽管 LS 也表现出相对较好的可靠性,但它不如 LP 或 L(+) 可靠或准确。