Suppr超能文献

琼脂稀释法和 Vitek 2 卡检测葡萄球菌属诱导型克林霉素耐药性的性能比较。

Performance of an agar dilution method and a Vitek 2 card for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus spp.

机构信息

Département de Microbiologie, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415 Boulevard de l'Assomption, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Apr;48(4):1354-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01751-09. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

Abstract

The D-zone test detects inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus spp. Two other methods not described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) are available to test for this resistance mechanism: an agar dilution method and new Vitek 2 cards. This study evaluated the performance of both methods in detecting inducible clindamycin resistance. Nonduplicate clinical strains of Staphylococcus spp. (111 Staphylococcus aureus and 52 coagulase-negative staphylococcus strains), intermediate or resistant to erythromycin but susceptible to clindamycin, were obtained from three hospitals in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Molecular analysis to detect resistance genes was conducted on all strains. A Mueller-Hinton agar containing 1 mg of erythromycin and 0.5 mg of clindamycin/liter was used for the dilution method, and two inocula were tested: 10(4) and 10(5) CFU per spot. Plates were read at 24 and 48 h. The Vitek 2 AST-P580 card was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The results were compared to those of the D-zone test. The D-zone test was positive in 134 of 163 (82%) strains. With the 10(4) CFU inoculum, the sensitivities were 84 and 99% at 24 and 48 h, respectively. The 10(5) CFU inoculum increased the sensitivities at 24 and 48 h to 91 and 100%, respectively. The specificity was 100% for the 10(4) CFU inoculum at 24 h and 97% for the other combinations. The sensitivity and specificity for the Vitek 2 card were 93 and 100%, respectively. The performance of both the agar dilution method and the Vitek 2 card was good, but these methods were not as sensitive as the D-zone test at 24 h.

摘要

D 试验检测葡萄球菌属中诱导型克林霉素耐药性。CLSI 未描述的另外两种检测这种耐药机制的方法是琼脂稀释法和新的 Vitek 2 卡。本研究评估了这两种方法检测诱导型克林霉素耐药性的性能。从加拿大魁北克省蒙特利尔的三家医院获得了非重复的葡萄球菌属临床菌株(111 株金黄色葡萄球菌和 52 株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌株),这些菌株对红霉素中介或耐药,但对克林霉素敏感。对所有菌株进行了检测耐药基因的分子分析。在含有 1 毫克红霉素和 0.5 毫克克林霉素/升的 Mueller-Hinton 琼脂上进行稀释法,测试了两个接种物:10(4)和 10(5)CFU/点。在 24 和 48 小时读取平板。根据制造商的建议使用 Vitek 2 AST-P580 卡。将结果与 D 区试验进行比较。D 区试验在 163 株中的 134 株(82%)为阳性。在 10(4)CFU 接种物时,分别在 24 和 48 小时时的敏感性为 84%和 99%。10(5)CFU 接种物分别将 24 和 48 小时时的敏感性提高到 91%和 100%。在 24 小时时,10(4)CFU 接种物的特异性为 100%,其他组合的特异性为 97%。Vitek 2 卡的敏感性和特异性分别为 93%和 100%。琼脂稀释法和 Vitek 2 卡的性能都很好,但与 D 区试验相比,这些方法在 24 小时时的敏感性较低。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Expert systems in clinical microbiology.临床微生物学中的专家系统。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011 Jul;24(3):515-56. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00061-10.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验