Suppr超能文献

计算蛋白质-配体结合亲和力时考虑配体构象限制。

Accounting for ligand conformational restriction in calculations of protein-ligand binding affinities.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester, New York, USA.

出版信息

Biophys J. 2010 Mar 3;98(5):901-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.018.

Abstract

The conformation adopted by a ligand on binding to a receptor may differ from its lowest-energy conformation in solution. In addition, the bound ligand is more conformationally restricted, which is associated with a configurational entropy loss. The free energy change due to these effects is often neglected or treated crudely in current models for predicting binding affinity. We present a method for estimating this contribution, based on perturbation theory using the quasi-harmonic model of Karplus and Kushick as a reference system. The consistency of the method is checked for small model systems. Subsequently we use the method, along with an estimate for the enthalpic contribution due to ligand-receptor interactions, to calculate relative binding affinities. The AMBER force field and generalized Born implicit solvent model is used. Binding affinities were estimated for a test set of 233 protein-ligand complexes for which crystal structures and measured binding affinities are available. In most cases, the ligand conformation in the bound state was significantly different from the most favorable conformation in solution. In general, the correlation between measured and calculated ligand binding affinities including the free energy change due to ligand conformational change is comparable to or slightly better than that obtained by using an empirically-trained docking score. Both entropic and enthalpic contributions to this free energy change are significant.

摘要

配体与受体结合时所采取的构象可能与其在溶液中的最低能量构象不同。此外,结合的配体受到更多的构象限制,这与构象熵损失有关。在当前用于预测结合亲和力的模型中,这些效应引起的自由能变化通常被忽略或粗略处理。我们提出了一种估计这种贡献的方法,该方法基于使用 Karplus 和 Kushick 的准谐模型作为参考系统的微扰理论。我们检查了该方法在小模型系统中的一致性。随后,我们使用该方法以及配体-受体相互作用引起的焓贡献的估计值来计算相对结合亲和力。我们使用 AMBER 力场和广义 Born 隐溶剂模型。对于具有晶体结构和测量结合亲和力的 233 个蛋白质-配体复合物的测试集,我们估计了结合亲和力。在大多数情况下,结合状态下的配体构象与溶液中最有利的构象明显不同。通常,包括配体构象变化引起的自由能变化在内的测量和计算的配体结合亲和力之间的相关性与使用经验训练的对接评分获得的相关性相当或略好。熵和焓对这种自由能变化都有重要贡献。

相似文献

3
Conformational energy penalties of protein-bound ligands.蛋白质结合配体的构象能罚值。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1998 Jul;12(4):383-96. doi: 10.1023/a:1008007507641.

引用本文的文献

3
Calculation of Crystal-Solution Dissociation Constants.计算晶体溶液离解常数。
Biomolecules. 2022 Jan 18;12(2):147. doi: 10.3390/biom12020147.
8
The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.用于估计配体结合亲和力的MM/PBSA和MM/GBSA方法。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015 May;10(5):449-61. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Accuracy of the Quasiharmonic Approximation.评估准谐近似的准确性。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2005 Sep;1(5):1017-28. doi: 10.1021/ct0500904.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验