Research Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 4;5(3):e9548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009548.
College and university students experience substantial morbidity from influenza and influenza-like illness, and they can benefit substantially from vaccination. Public health authorities encourage vaccination not only before the influenza season but also into and even throughout the influenza season. We conducted the present study to assess the impact of various vaccination strategies including delayed (i.e., in-season) vaccination on influenza outbreaks on a college campus.
METHODS/FINDINGS: We used a Susceptible --> Infected --> Recovered (SIR) framework for our mathematical models to simulate influenza epidemics in a closed, college campus. We included both students and faculty/staff in the model and derived values for the model parameters from the published literature. The values for key model parameters were varied to assess the impact on the outbreak of various pre-season and delayed vaccination rates; one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the sensitivity of the model outputs to changes in selected parameter values. In the base case, with a pre-season vaccination rate of 20%, no delayed vaccination, and 1 student index case, the total attack rate (total percent infected, TAR) was 45%. With higher pre-season vaccination rates TARs were lower. Even if vaccinations were given 30 days after outbreak onset, TARs were still lower than the TAR of 69% in the absence of vaccination. Varying the proportions of vaccinations given pre-season versus delayed until after the onset of the outbreak gave intermediate TAR values. Base case outputs were sensitive to changes in infectious contact rates and infectious periods and a holiday/break schedule.
Delayed vaccination and holidays/breaks can be important adjunctive measures to complement traditional pre-season influenza vaccination for controlling and preventing influenza in a closed college campus.
大学生患流感和类流感疾病的发病率较高,接种疫苗可使他们大大受益。公共卫生部门不仅鼓励在流感季节前接种疫苗,还鼓励在流感季节期间甚至贯穿整个流感季节进行接种。我们进行本项研究,旨在评估包括延迟(即季节性)接种在内的各种接种策略对大学校园流感爆发的影响。
方法/发现:我们使用易感者-感染者-康复者(SIR)框架对数学模型进行模拟,以模拟封闭大学校园中的流感流行。我们将学生和教职员工都纳入模型,并从已发表的文献中得出模型参数的值。我们改变了模型中关键参数的值,以评估各种季节性前和延迟接种率对疫情爆发的影响;进行了单因素敏感性分析,以测试模型输出对选定参数值变化的敏感性。在基础案例中,假设季节性前接种率为 20%,没有延迟接种,且有 1 名学生作为首发病例,总发病(总感染百分比,TAR)为 45%。随着季节性前接种率的提高,TAR 降低。即使在疫情爆发后 30 天接种疫苗,TAR 仍低于不接种疫苗时 69%的 TAR。季节性前接种和延迟接种的比例不同,TAR 处于中间水平。基础案例的结果对传染性接触率和传染性期以及假期/休息时间表的变化敏感。
延迟接种和假期/休息时间可以是传统季节性流感疫苗接种的重要辅助措施,可用于控制和预防封闭大学校园中的流感。