School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 8 Malone Road, Belfast BT9 5BN, UK.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Oct;47(10):1299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.015. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
To explore the relationship between sources of stress and psychological burn-out and to consider the moderating and mediating role played sources of stress and different coping resources on burn-out.
Most research exploring sources of stress and coping in nursing students construes stress as psychological distress. Little research has considered those sources of stress likely to enhance well-being and, by implication, learning.
A questionnaire was administered to 171 final year nursing students. Questions were asked which measured sources of stress when rated as likely to contribute to distress (a hassle) and rated as likely to help one achieve (an uplift). Support, control, self-efficacy and coping style were also measured, along with their potential moderating and mediating effect on burn-out.
The sources of stress likely to lead to distress were more often predictors of well-being than sources of stress likely to lead to positive, eustress states. However, placement experience was an important source of stress likely to lead to eustress. Self-efficacy, dispositional control and support were other important predictors. Avoidance coping was the strongest predictor of burn-out and, even if used only occasionally, it can have an adverse effect on burn-out. Initiatives to promote support and self-efficacy are likely to have the more immediate benefits in enhancing student well-being.
Nurse educators need to consider how course experiences contribute not just to potential distress but to eustress. How educators interact with their students and how they give feedback offers important opportunities to promote self-efficacy and provide valuable support. Peer support is a critical coping resource and can be bolstered through induction and through learning and teaching initiatives.
探讨压力源与心理倦怠的关系,并考虑压力源与不同应对资源对倦怠的调节和中介作用。
大多数探索护理学生压力源和应对方式的研究将压力视为心理困扰。很少有研究考虑那些可能增强幸福感并间接地促进学习的压力源。
对 171 名护理专业大四学生进行问卷调查。问题包括当压力源被评定为可能导致困扰(麻烦)和可能有助于实现(提升)时,评估其压力源。还测量了支持、控制、自我效能和应对方式,以及它们对倦怠的潜在调节和中介作用。
导致困扰的压力源往往比导致积极的正性压力源更能预测幸福感。然而,实习经历是导致正性压力的重要压力源。自我效能、特质控制和支持也是其他重要的预测因素。回避应对是倦怠的最强预测因素,即使偶尔使用,也会对倦怠产生不利影响。促进支持和自我效能的举措可能会更直接地提高学生的幸福感。
护理教育者需要考虑课程经验不仅对潜在的困扰有影响,对正性压力也有影响。教育者与学生的互动方式以及他们提供反馈的方式为提高自我效能和提供有价值的支持提供了重要机会。同伴支持是一种关键的应对资源,可以通过入职培训以及学习和教学举措来增强。