• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同方案应用后口腔内洗必泰的留置初步观察。

First insights into chlorhexidine retention in the oral cavity after application of different regimens.

机构信息

Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital, Saarland University, Building 73, 66421, Homburg, Saar, Germany.

Physical Chemistry and Didactics of Chemistry, Saarland University, Campus B2 2, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6109-6118. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03910-y. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-021-03910-y
PMID:33825020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8531059/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This in situ study aimed to determine and compare the chlorhexidine (CHX) retention in the oral cavity after the application of different CHX pharmaceutical regimens.

METHODS

Five volunteers used different CHX treatment regimens including mouth rinses, dental spray and toothpaste gel. After the application of the different CHX regimens, 2-μl samples were taken from saliva and buccal mucosa pellicle as well as the dental pellicle samples formed on standardized enamel surfaces. Sample collection was conducted at six time points within 12 h. Retention of CHX was measured using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

CHX retention values in the oral mucosa pellicle were significantly higher than those in saliva. CHX remained in the mucosal pellicle at microgrammes per millilitre levels for 12 h after mouth rinsing, 10 h after spray application and 2 h after using the toothpaste. CHX was detected in the dental pellicle for at least 12 h after application of mouth rinsing and spray. Retention of CHX after mouth rinsing or spray application was significantly higher than the retention after using toothpaste.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral mucosa was the favourable site for CHX retention. Higher mouth rinse concentration and longer rinsing time produced a slight increase in CHX retention. CHX spray provided considerable retention values, whereas toothpaste gel delivered the lowest retention after application. MALDI-TOF was a sensitive method with excellent limits of quantification for CHX detection.

摘要

目的

本原位研究旨在确定和比较不同洗必泰(CHX)给药方案在口腔中的保留情况。

方法

5 名志愿者使用不同的 CHX 治疗方案,包括漱口、口腔喷雾和牙膏凝胶。在使用不同的 CHX 方案后,在 12 小时内的 6 个时间点,从唾液和颊黏膜上皮以及标准化牙釉质表面形成的牙菌斑样本中采集 2μl 样本。采用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱法测定 CHX 的保留情况。

结果

口腔黏膜上皮中的 CHX 保留值明显高于唾液中的保留值。漱口后 12 小时、喷雾后 10 小时和使用牙膏后 2 小时,CHX 仍以微克/毫升的水平保留在黏膜上皮中。漱口和喷雾后,CHX 至少在 12 小时内可检测到牙菌斑。漱口或喷雾后 CHX 的保留明显高于使用牙膏后 CHX 的保留。

结论

口腔黏膜是 CHX 保留的有利部位。较高的漱口液浓度和较长的漱口时间可略微增加 CHX 的保留。CHX 喷雾提供了相当高的保留值,而牙膏凝胶在使用后提供的保留值最低。MALDI-TOF 是一种灵敏的方法,对 CHX 的检测具有优异的定量限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/4ba11faa4791/784_2021_3910_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/23bc9978ccd5/784_2021_3910_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/c92699e310ab/784_2021_3910_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/826a9a12dc5e/784_2021_3910_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/c62d38a0fcf2/784_2021_3910_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/4ba11faa4791/784_2021_3910_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/23bc9978ccd5/784_2021_3910_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/c92699e310ab/784_2021_3910_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/826a9a12dc5e/784_2021_3910_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/c62d38a0fcf2/784_2021_3910_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ada6/8531059/4ba11faa4791/784_2021_3910_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
First insights into chlorhexidine retention in the oral cavity after application of different regimens.不同方案应用后口腔内洗必泰的留置初步观察。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6109-6118. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03910-y. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Determination of chlorhexidine retention in different oral sites using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.采用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法测定不同口腔部位的洗必泰保留量。
Arch Oral Biol. 2020 Feb;110:104623. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104623. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
3
Chlorhexidine rinsing inhibits biofilm formation and causes biofilm disruption on dental enamel in situ.氯己定冲洗可抑制牙釉质表面生物膜的形成,并破坏已形成的生物膜。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Nov;24(11):3843-3853. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03250-3. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Caries lesion remineralization with fluoride toothpastes and chlorhexidine - effects of application timing and toothpaste surfactant.含氟牙膏和氯己定对龋损再矿化的影响——应用时机和牙膏表面活性剂的作用
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 Jun 11;26:e20170499. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0499.
5
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse in combination with an SLS-containing dentifrice and a dentifrice slurry.洗必泰漱口水与含月桂醇硫酸酯钠的牙膏及牙膏糊剂联合使用。
J Clin Periodontol. 2006 May;33(5):340-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00910.x.
6
Comparative effects of different chlorhexidine mouth-rinse formulations on volatile sulphur compounds and salivary bacterial counts.不同洗必泰漱口水配方对挥发性硫化物和唾液细菌计数的比较效果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1128-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00621.x.
7
Chlorhexidine substantivity on salivary flora and plaque-like biofilm: an in situ model.氯己定在唾液菌群和菌斑样生物膜上的持留性:原位模型。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 27;8(12):e83522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083522. eCollection 2013.
8
A comparison of the plaque-inhibitory properties of stannous fluoride and low-concentration chlorhexidine mouthrinses.氟化亚锡与低浓度洗必泰漱口水的防龋斑特性比较。
J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Dec;29(12):1072-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.291204.x.
9
Evaluation of the substantivity in saliva of different forms of application of chlorhexidine.不同应用形式的氯己定在唾液中的持续性评估。
Quintessence Int. 2009 Feb;40(2):141-4.
10
The commercially available oral rinse vs. curcumin photosensitizers in an artificial mouth model mimicking their use after meals on early colonizers single species biofilm: An in vitro study.在模拟餐后使用的人工口腔模型中,市售口腔含漱液与姜黄素光敏剂对早期定殖单一物种生物膜的影响:一项体外研究。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(4):2685-2696. doi: 10.3233/THC-231814.

引用本文的文献

1
Large-scale screening identifies enzyme combinations that remove grown oral biofilm.大规模筛查确定了可去除成熟口腔生物膜的酶组合。
Biofilm. 2024 Oct 4;8:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100229. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Implant Surface Decontamination Methods That Can Impact Implant Wettability.可影响种植体润湿性的种植体表面去污方法。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;17(24):6249. doi: 10.3390/ma17246249.
3
Insights into the Cytotoxicity and Irritant Potential of Chlorhexidine Digluconate: An In Vitro and In Ovo Safety Screening.

本文引用的文献

1
Determination of chlorhexidine retention in different oral sites using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.采用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法测定不同口腔部位的洗必泰保留量。
Arch Oral Biol. 2020 Feb;110:104623. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104623. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
2
International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): A New Concept.国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAS):一个新概念。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 May-Aug;4(2):93-100. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1089. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
3
Chlorhexidine spray as an adjunct in the control of dental biofilm in children with special needs.
葡萄糖酸氯己定的细胞毒性和刺激潜力研究:体外和鸡胚内安全筛选
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 17;12(7):221. doi: 10.3390/dj12070221.
4
Mucoadhesive Pharmacology: Latest Clinical Technology in Antiseptic Gels.黏膜黏附药理学:抗菌凝胶中的最新临床技术
Gels. 2023 Dec 26;10(1):23. doi: 10.3390/gels10010023.
5
A Comparison of the Adaptive Response of vs. and the Development of Chlorhexidine Resistance.[具体两种物质名称]的适应性反应与洗必泰耐药性发展的比较。 (注:原文中“vs.”前和后具体物质名称缺失)
Front Microbiol. 2022 May 19;13:861890. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.861890. eCollection 2022.
洗必泰喷雾剂作为辅助手段用于控制特殊需求儿童的牙菌斑。
Spec Care Dentist. 2014 Nov-Dec;34(6):286-90. doi: 10.1111/scd.12069. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
4
The effect of chlorhexidine dentifrice or gel versus chlorhexidine mouthwash on plaque, gingivitis, bleeding and tooth discoloration: a systematic review.洗必泰牙膏或凝胶与洗必泰漱口水对牙菌斑、牙龈炎、出血和牙齿变色的影响:一项系统评价
Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 May;13(2):83-92. doi: 10.1111/idh.12078. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
5
The efficacy of chlorhexidine dentifrice or gel on plaque, clinical parameters of gingival inflammation and tooth discoloration: a systematic review.洗必泰牙膏或凝胶对菌斑、牙龈炎症临床参数和牙齿着色的疗效:系统评价。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2014 Feb;12(1):25-35. doi: 10.1111/idh.12050. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
6
Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on plaque, gingival inflammation and staining in gingivitis patients: a systematic review.氯己定漱口水对牙龈炎患者菌斑、牙龈炎症和染色的影响:系统评价。
J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Nov;39(11):1042-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01883.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
7
The effect of 1% chlorhexidine gel and 0.12% dentifrice gel on plaque accumulation: a 3-day non-brushing model.1%洗必泰凝胶和 0.12%牙膏凝胶对菌斑积累的影响:为期 3 天的不刷牙模型。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2010 Nov;8(4):294-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00487.x.
8
The efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse compared with 0.2% on plaque accumulation and periodontal parameters: a systematic review.0.12%洗必泰漱口水与 0.2%洗必泰相比在抑制菌斑积聚和牙周参数方面的疗效:系统评价。
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Sep;37(9):829-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01575.x. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
9
Substantivity of a single chlorhexidine mouthwash on salivary flora: influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors.单支洗必泰含漱液对唾液菌群的固有性:内在和外在因素的影响。
J Dent. 2010 Jul;38(7):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
10
Use of chlorhexidine varnishes in preventing and treating periodontal disease. A review of the literature.洗必泰清漆在预防和治疗牙周疾病中的应用。文献综述。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Apr 1;13(4):E257-60.