Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08640-6.
Indonesia shoulders a significant tobacco burden, with almost two million cases of tobacco-related illnesses and more than two hundred thousand tobacco-related deaths annually. Indonesian tobacco control is progressing but lags behind other countries. Our study evaluates factors that contribute to the slow progress of tobacco policy change in Indonesia from the perspective of tobacco control experts (TCEs).
We conducted qualitative interviews with four international and ten national TCEs, who have been active in tobacco control for at least 5 years. Our interview guideline included questions on the current tobacco control situation in Indonesia and explored reasons why tobacco control is progressing so slowly. The interviews were conducted either in English or Bahasa Indonesia, recorded and then transcribed verbatim. We conducted a thematic analysis based on five core causal factors for policy adoption: institutions, networks, socio-economic factors, agendas and ideas.
The multistage delay of tobacco policy adoption is principally due to political structures and policy hierarchy, complex bureaucracy, unclear roles and responsibilities, and a high degree of corruption. The low bargaining position and lack of respect for the Ministry of Health also contributes. There are contrasting frames of tobacco as a strategic economic asset and tobacco control as a sovereignty threat. There is an imbalance of power and influence between well entrenched and resourced tobacco industry networks compared to relatively young and less established tobacco control networks. The policy agenda is likely influenced by the privileged position of tobacco in Indonesia as a socially acceptable product with high consumption. There are constraints on transferring ideas and evidence to successful policy adoption.
Tobacco companies have substantially influenced both policy decisions and public perceptions, signifying a power imbalance within the government system and broader networks. Acceding to and enforcing the World Health Organization- Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC) would enable the Indonesian government to shift the power imbalance towards public health stakeholders. Tobacco control advocates must enhance their network cohesion and embrace other community groups to improve engagement and communication with policymakers.
印度尼西亚承担着巨大的烟草负担,每年有近 200 万例与烟草相关的疾病和 20 多万例与烟草相关的死亡。印度尼西亚的烟草控制工作正在取得进展,但落后于其他国家。我们的研究从烟草控制专家(TCE)的角度评估了导致印度尼西亚烟草政策变革进展缓慢的因素。
我们对四位国际和十位国家 TCE 进行了定性访谈,他们从事烟草控制工作至少 5 年。我们的访谈指南包括印度尼西亚当前烟草控制情况的问题,并探讨了烟草控制进展如此缓慢的原因。访谈以英语或印尼语进行,录音并逐字记录。我们根据政策采用的五个核心因果因素进行了主题分析:机构、网络、社会经济因素、议程和想法。
烟草政策采用的多阶段延迟主要是由于政治结构和政策层次、复杂的官僚机构、角色和责任不明确以及高度腐败。卫生部的讨价还价地位较低和缺乏尊重也有贡献。烟草作为战略性经济资产和烟草控制作为主权威胁的框架存在差异。与相对年轻和不太成熟的烟草控制网络相比,根深蒂固和资源丰富的烟草行业网络拥有权力和影响力的不平衡。政策议程可能受到烟草在印度尼西亚作为一种社会可接受的高消费产品的特权地位的影响。将想法和证据成功转化为政策采用存在限制。
烟草公司对政策决策和公众看法产生了重大影响,这表明政府系统和更广泛的网络内部存在权力失衡。加入并执行世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约(WHO-FCTC)将使印度尼西亚政府能够将权力失衡转向公共卫生利益相关者。烟草控制倡导者必须增强其网络凝聚力,并接纳其他社区团体,以改善与政策制定者的参与和沟通。