• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于选择居住区域原因、身体活动与身体质量指数之间关系的纵向和横断面研究。

A longitudinal and cross-sectional examination of the relationship between reasons for choosing a neighbourhood, physical activity and body mass index.

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Jul 5;7:57. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-57.

DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-7-57
PMID:20602776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2910030/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between body mass index and neighborhood walkability, socioeconomic status (SES), reasons for choosing neighborhoods, physical activity, fruit and vegetable intake, and demographic variables.

METHODS

Two studies, one longitudinal and one cross-sectional, were conducted. Participants included adults (n = 572) who provided complete data in 2002 and 2008 and a concurrent sample from 2008 (n = 1164). Data were collected with longitudinal and cross-sectional telephone surveys. Objective measures of neighborhood characteristics (walkability and SES) were calculated using census data and geographic information.

RESULTS

In the longitudinal study, neighborhood choice for ease of walking and proximity to outdoor recreation interacted with whether participants had moved during the course of study to predict change in BMI over 6 years. Age, change in activity status, and neighborhood SES were also significant predictors of BMI change. Cross-sectionally, neighborhood SES and neighborhood choice for ease of walking were significantly related to BMI as were gender, age, activity level and fruit and vegetable intake.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate that placing importance on choosing neighborhoods that are considered to be easily walkable is an important contributor to body weight. Findings that objectively measured neighbourhood SES and neighborhood choice variables contributed to BMI suggest that future research consider the role of neighborhood choice in examining the relationships between the built environment and body weight.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨体重指数与邻里可步行性、社会经济地位(SES)、选择邻里的原因、身体活动、水果和蔬菜摄入量以及人口统计学变量之间的关系。

方法

进行了两项研究,一项是纵向研究,一项是横断面研究。参与者包括在 2002 年和 2008 年提供完整数据的成年人(n=572)和 2008 年同期样本(n=1164)。数据通过纵向和横断面电话调查收集。使用人口普查数据和地理信息计算邻里特征(可步行性和 SES)的客观指标。

结果

在纵向研究中,选择易于步行的邻里和靠近户外娱乐的邻里与参与者在研究过程中是否搬家一起预测 BMI 在 6 年内的变化。年龄、活动状态的变化以及邻里 SES 也是 BMI 变化的重要预测因素。横断面研究中,邻里 SES 和选择易于步行的邻里与 BMI 显著相关,性别、年龄、活动水平和水果和蔬菜摄入量也是如此。

结论

结果表明,重视选择被认为易于步行的邻里是控制体重的一个重要因素。客观测量的邻里 SES 和邻里选择变量对 BMI 有贡献的发现表明,未来的研究应考虑邻里选择在研究建筑环境与体重之间关系中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b0e/2910030/0e8ddf13f6d9/1479-5868-7-57-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b0e/2910030/84b19ae5d3ab/1479-5868-7-57-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b0e/2910030/0e8ddf13f6d9/1479-5868-7-57-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b0e/2910030/84b19ae5d3ab/1479-5868-7-57-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b0e/2910030/0e8ddf13f6d9/1479-5868-7-57-2.jpg

相似文献

1
A longitudinal and cross-sectional examination of the relationship between reasons for choosing a neighbourhood, physical activity and body mass index.一项关于选择居住区域原因、身体活动与身体质量指数之间关系的纵向和横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Jul 5;7:57. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-57.
2
Changes in BMI over 6 years: the role of demographic and neighborhood characteristics.6 年内 BMI 的变化:人口统计学和邻里特征的作用。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Aug;34(8):1275-83. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.36. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
3
Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between the built environment and walking: effect modification by socioeconomic status.建成环境与步行的横断面和纵向关联:社会经济地位的调节作用。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):1233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13611-0.
4
Neighborhood Built Environment and Socioeconomic Status are Associated with Active Commuting and Sedentary Behavior, but not with Leisure-Time Physical Activity, in University Students.社区建成环境和社会经济地位与大学生的主动通勤和久坐行为相关,但与休闲时间体力活动无关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 31;16(17):3176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173176.
5
Active living neighborhoods: is neighborhood walkability a key element for Belgian adolescents?积极生活的社区:社区可步行性是否是比利时青少年的关键因素?
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 4;12:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-7.
6
Neighborhood built environment and socio-economic status in relation to multiple health outcomes in adolescents.社区建成环境与社会经济地位对青少年健康的多重影响。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
A longitudinal examination of objective neighborhood walkability, body mass index, and waist circumference: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study.一项关于客观邻里步行性、体重指数和腰围的纵向研究:地理和种族差异导致中风的原因研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Feb 12;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01247-7.
8
Neighborhood walkability and TV viewing time among Australian adults.澳大利亚成年人的邻里环境适宜步行程度与看电视时间
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.035.
9
The associations between objectively-determined and self-reported urban form characteristics and neighborhood-based walking in adults.客观确定的和自我报告的城市形态特征与成年人基于社区的步行之间的关联。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jun 4;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-71.
10
Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults.澳大利亚成年人的邻里环境适宜步行程度与步行行为
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Nov;33(5):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive walkability evaluation system for promoting environmental benefits.一个用于促进环境效益的综合步行适宜性评估系统。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43261-0.
2
Virtual reality assessment of walking in a modifiable urban environment: a feasibility and acceptability study.虚拟现实评估可修改城市环境中的行走:一项可行性和可接受性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):5867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32139-w.
3
Neighbourhood effects on obesity: scoping review of time-varying outcomes and exposures in longitudinal designs.

本文引用的文献

1
How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis.进行回归分析需要多少受试者?
Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Jul 1;26(3):499-510. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7.
2
[Chinese guidelines for data processing and analysis concerning the International Physical Activity Questionnaire].[国际体力活动问卷数据处理与分析中国指南]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;35(8):961-4.
3
Environment and Physical Activity Dynamics: The Role of Residential Self-selection.环境与身体活动动态:居住自我选择的作用。
邻里效应对肥胖的影响:纵向设计中时变结局和暴露因素的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 25;10(3):e034690. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034690.
4
Urban Moveability and physical activity in children: longitudinal results from the IDEFICS and I.Family cohort.城市流动性与儿童身体活动:IDEFICS 和 I.Family 队列的纵向研究结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Dec 11;16(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0886-2.
5
Determinants of Residential Preferences Related to Built and Social Environments and Concordance between Neighborhood Characteristics and Preferences.与建筑和社会环境相关的居住偏好的决定因素以及邻里特征与偏好的一致性。
J Urban Health. 2020 Feb;97(1):62-77. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00397-7.
6
Walkability, Overweight, and Obesity in Adults: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.成人的可步行性、超重和肥胖:观察性研究的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;16(17):3135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173135.
7
Multilevel Analysis of Socio-Demographic Disparities in Adulthood Obesity Across the United States Geographic Regions.美国各地理区域成年肥胖症社会人口差异的多层次分析。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2019 Jun;10(3):137-144. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2019.10.3.04.
8
A scoping review on the relations between urban form and health: a focus on Canadian quantitative evidence.城市形态与健康关系的范围综述:以加拿大定量证据为重点。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2019 May;39(5):187-200. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.39.5.03.
9
The Moving to Health (M2H) approach to natural experiment research: A paradigm shift for studies on built environment and health.自然实验研究的“迈向健康”(M2H)方法:建筑环境与健康研究的范式转变。
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Dec 28;7:100345. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.100345. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Exploring the cross-sectional association between outdoor recreational facilities and leisure-time physical activity: the role of usage and residential self-selection.探究户外娱乐设施与闲暇时间体育活动之间的横断面关联:使用和居住自选择的作用。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 18;15(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0689-x.
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011 Jan 1;12(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.09.003.
4
Changes in BMI over 6 years: the role of demographic and neighborhood characteristics.6 年内 BMI 的变化:人口统计学和邻里特征的作用。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Aug;34(8):1275-83. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.36. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
5
Association between fruit juice consumption and self-reported body mass index among adult Canadians.加拿大成年人中果汁摄入量与自报体重指数的关系。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Apr;23(2):162-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2009.01029.x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
6
The built environment and physical activity levels: the Harvard Alumni Health Study.建筑环境与身体活动水平:哈佛校友健康研究
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.007.
7
Key stakeholder perspectives on the development of walkable neighbourhoods.关键利益相关者对可步行社区发展的观点。
Health Place. 2010 Jan;16(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
8
Explaining the obesity paradox: cardiovascular risk, weight change, and mortality during long-term follow-up in men.解释肥胖悖论:男性长期随访期间的心血管风险、体重变化和死亡率
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jul;30(14):1720-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp162. Epub 2009 May 9.
9
The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study.步行适宜性指数的制定:在邻里生活质量研究中的应用。
Br J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;44(13):924-33. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
10
Weighing the importance of neighbourhood: a multilevel exploration of the determinants of overweight and obesity.权衡邻里环境的重要性:对超重和肥胖决定因素的多层次探索
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Feb;68(4):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.021. Epub 2008 Dec 25.