• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与超声角膜测厚仪比较,Galilei 双重Scheimpflug 分析仪对中央角膜厚度的测量。

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry.

机构信息

Dada Laser Eye Institute, Pune, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep-Oct;58(5):385-8. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.67045.

DOI:10.4103/0301-4738.67045
PMID:20689192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2992912/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare corneal pachymetry assessment by the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer with that done by ultrasound (US) pachymetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty six patients (92 eyes) were subjected to corneal pachymetry assessment by Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and US. All the readings were taken by a single operator. Intraoperator repeatability for the Galilei was assessed by taking 10 readings in one eye each of 10 patients. To study the interoperator reproducibility for the Galilei, two observers took a single reading in both the eyes of 25 patients.

RESULTS

The mean central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by US was 541.83 +/- 30.56 microm standard deviation (SD) and that measured by Galilei was 541.27 +/- 30.07 microm (SD). There was no statistically significant difference between both the methods (P < 0.001). The coefficient of repeatability was 0.43% while the coefficient of reproducibility was 0.377% for the Galilei.

CONCLUSION

Objective, noncontact measurement of the CCT with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer was convenient, had excellent intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility, and findings were similar to those obtained with standard US pachymetry.

摘要

目的

比较 Galilei 双折射仪和超声(US)角膜测厚仪对角膜厚度的评估。

材料与方法

对 46 例(92 只眼)患者同时行 Galilei 双折射仪和 US 角膜测厚检查。所有检查均由同一位操作者完成。通过对 10 例患者每只眼测量 10 次,评估 Galilei 仪的操作者内重复性。为研究 Galilei 仪的操作者间可重复性,两位观察者在 25 例患者的双眼各测量 1 次。

结果

US 测量的中央角膜厚度(CCT)平均值为 541.83±30.56μm(标准差[SD]),Galilei 仪测量的平均值为 541.27±30.07μm(SD)。两种方法之间无统计学差异(P<0.001)。Galilei 仪的重复性系数为 0.43%,再现性系数为 0.377%。

结论

Galilei 双折射仪客观、非接触式测量 CCT 既方便,操作者内重复性又好,操作者间再现性也好,与标准 US 角膜测厚的结果相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b6/2992912/6921da7bacb4/IJO-58-385-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b6/2992912/b886af35456a/IJO-58-385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b6/2992912/407aa1474c65/IJO-58-385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b6/2992912/6921da7bacb4/IJO-58-385-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b6/2992912/b886af35456a/IJO-58-385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b6/2992912/407aa1474c65/IJO-58-385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b6/2992912/6921da7bacb4/IJO-58-385-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry.与超声角膜测厚仪比较,Galilei 双重Scheimpflug 分析仪对中央角膜厚度的测量。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep-Oct;58(5):385-8. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.67045.
2
Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry.使用Pentacam眼前节分析系统、光学低相干反射测量法角膜测厚仪和超声角膜测厚法测量中央角膜厚度。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Sep;31(9):1729-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.058.
3
Evaluation of corneal pachymetry measurements by Galilei dual Scheimpflug camera.使用伽利略双施密特-普福尔茨相机评估角膜测厚测量值
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22 Suppl 7:S33-9. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000056.
4
Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.使用 Galilei、HR Pentacam 和超声测量角膜厚度的比较。
Cornea. 2010 Oct;29(10):1091-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cf98e5.
5
Comparison and reproducibility of corneal thickness and curvature readings obtained by the Galilei and the Orbscan II analysis systems.伽利略分析系统与Orbscan II分析系统所测角膜厚度及曲率读数的比较与可重复性
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Oct;34(10):1742-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.024.
6
Repeatability and comparability of corneal thickness measurements obtained from Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and from ultrasonic pachymetry.应用于双重光切角膜断层扫描仪和超声角膜测厚仪的角膜厚度测量的可重复性和可比性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;251(7):1855-60. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2280-0. Epub 2013 Feb 17.
7
Evaluation of corneal thickness using a Scheimpflug-Placido disk corneal analyzer and comparison with ultrasound pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis.应用 Scheimpflug-Placido 角膜地形图仪评估 LASIK 术后角膜厚度并与超声角膜测厚仪比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;39(7):1074-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.038. Epub 2013 May 13.
8
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography.旋转式Scheimpflug相机、超声测厚法和扫描裂隙角膜地形图测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):937-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.063.
9
Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound.使用Pentacam、Orbscan和超声测量中央角膜厚度的可重复性和再现性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Oct;82(10):892-9. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000180817.46312.0a.
10
Intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility in the ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.中央角膜厚度超声测厚术中操作者内重复性和操作者间再现性
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 May;92(5):672-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Concepts and Recent Updates of Optical Biometry- A Comprehensive Review.光学生物测量的当前概念与最新进展——全面综述
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 May 2;18:1191-1206. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S464538. eCollection 2024.
2
Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION.双 Scheimpflug 分析仪、GALILEI G6 和扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪 ANTERION 的眼部生物测量学临床评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 4;12(1):3602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1.
3
Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness: meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison and reproducibility of corneal thickness and curvature readings obtained by the Galilei and the Orbscan II analysis systems.伽利略分析系统与Orbscan II分析系统所测角膜厚度及曲率读数的比较与可重复性
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Oct;34(10):1742-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.024.
2
Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.近视患者行准分子原位角膜磨镶术后使用Orbscan II、Visante、超声及Pentacam测量中央角膜厚度
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jul;33(7):1177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.028.
3
用于测量中央角膜厚度的Sirius Scheimpflug - Placido与超声测厚法:荟萃分析
Eye Vis (Lond). 2021 Feb 18;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00227-5.
4
Psychometric of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II in Indonesia.印度尼西亚好奇心与探索量表第二版的心理测量学
J Public Health Res. 2020 Sep 3;9(3):1745. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2020.1745. eCollection 2020 Jul 28.
5
A review of imaging modalities for detecting early keratoconus.早期圆锥角膜的影像学检测方法综述。
Eye (Lond). 2021 Jan;35(1):173-187. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1039-1. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.比较不同成像设备和超声角膜测厚仪测量的中央角膜厚度。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;67(4):496-499. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_960_18.
7
Comparison of Repeatability and Agreement between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Dual-Scheimpflug Topography.扫频光学生物测量与双Scheimpflug地形图之间的重复性和一致性比较。
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1516395. doi: 10.1155/2017/1516395. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
8
Comment on: Intraocular pressure and anetrior segment anatomy after phacoemulsification surgery.关于《白内障超声乳化吸除术后眼压及眼前节解剖结构》的评论
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;64(1):99. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.178157.
9
Difference in normal corneal thickness and curvature between Mongolian and Han nationalities.蒙古族和汉族之间正常角膜厚度及曲率的差异。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 18;8(2):399-402. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.02.33. eCollection 2015.
10
Evaluation of anterior segment parameters and possible influencing factors in normal subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer.使用双Scheimpflug分析仪评估正常受试者的眼前节参数及可能的影响因素。
PLoS One. 2014 May 16;9(5):e97913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097913. eCollection 2014.
Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth.
三种测量角膜厚度和前房深度方法的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan;141(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.048.
4
Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound.使用Pentacam、Orbscan和超声测量中央角膜厚度的可重复性和再现性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Oct;82(10):892-9. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000180817.46312.0a.
5
Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry.使用Pentacam眼前节分析系统、光学低相干反射测量法角膜测厚仪和超声角膜测厚法测量中央角膜厚度。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Sep;31(9):1729-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.058.
6
Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.在评估中央角膜厚度的超声测厚测量中观察者内和观察者间的可重复性。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;88(2):174-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.023416.
7
Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery.与白内障手术前光学生物测量相比,操作者经验对超声生物测量性能的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct;29(10):1950-5. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00243-8.
8
Corneal thickness measurements: scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry.角膜厚度测量:扫描裂隙角膜地形图及非接触式角膜内皮显微镜检查与超声角膜测厚法的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jul;29(7):1313-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00123-8.
9
Comparison of ultrasound pachymetry and partial coherence interferometry in the measurement of central corneal thickness.超声角膜测厚法与部分相干干涉测量法在中央角膜厚度测量中的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Dec;28(12):2142-5. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01533-x.
10
Intra-observer and inter-observer repeatability of anterior eye segment analysis system (EAS-1000) in anterior chamber configuration.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 Nov;22(6):552-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00074.x.