School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Building 44, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Oct;48(10):955-65. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.028. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
Current cognitive models stress the importance of negative self-perceptions in maintaining social anxiety, but focus predominantly on content rather than structure. Two studies examine the role of self-structure (self-organisation, self-complexity, and self-concept clarity) in social anxiety. In study one, self-organisation and self-concept clarity were correlated with social anxiety, and a step-wise multiple regression showed that after controlling for depression and self-esteem, which explained 35% of the variance in social anxiety scores, self-concept clarity uniquely predicted social anxiety and accounted for an additional 7% of the variance in social anxiety scores in an undergraduate sample (N=95) and the interaction between self-concept clarity and compartmentalisation (an aspect of evaluative self-organisation) at step 3 of the multiple regression accounted for a further 3% of the variance in social anxiety scores. In study two, high (n=26) socially anxious participants demonstrated less self-concept clarity than low socially anxious participants (n=26) on both self-report (used in study one) and on computerised measures of self-consistency and confidence in self-related judgments. The high socially anxious group had more compartmentalised self-organisation than the low anxious group, but there were no differences between the two groups on any of the other measures of self-organisation. Self-complexity did not contribute to social anxiety in either study, although this may have been due to the absence of a stressor. Overall, the results suggest that self-structure has a potentially important role in understanding social anxiety and that self-concept clarity and other aspects of self-structure such as compartmentalisation interact with each other and could be potential maintaining factors in social anxiety. Cognitive therapy for social phobia might influence self-structure, and understanding the role of structural variables in maintenance and treatment could eventually help to improve treatment outcome.
当前的认知模型强调消极的自我认知在维持社交焦虑中的重要性,但主要关注的是内容而不是结构。两项研究考察了自我结构(自我组织、自我复杂性和自我概念清晰度)在社交焦虑中的作用。在研究一中,自我组织和自我概念清晰度与社交焦虑相关,逐步多元回归显示,在控制抑郁和自尊(解释了社交焦虑得分 35%的方差)之后,自我概念清晰度可单独预测社交焦虑,并且在大学生样本(N=95)中解释了社交焦虑得分方差的另外 7%,并且在多元回归的第 3 步中自我概念清晰度与分割(评价性自我组织的一个方面)之间的相互作用解释了社交焦虑得分方差的另外 3%。在研究二中,与低社交焦虑参与者(n=26)相比,高社交焦虑参与者(n=26)在自我报告(用于研究一)和计算机化的自我一致性和自我相关判断信心测量上的自我概念清晰度较低。高社交焦虑组的自我组织比低焦虑组更加分割,但在其他自我组织测量上两组之间没有差异。自我复杂性在两项研究中均与社交焦虑无关,尽管这可能是由于缺乏压力源。总的来说,研究结果表明,自我结构在理解社交焦虑方面具有潜在的重要作用,自我概念清晰度和自我结构的其他方面(如分割)相互作用,可能是社交焦虑的维持因素。社交恐惧症的认知疗法可能会影响自我结构,理解结构变量在维持和治疗中的作用最终可能有助于改善治疗效果。