Delavande Adeline, Rohwedder Susann
RAND and Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, Tel 310-393-0411, ext 6593, Fax 310-260-8176,
Public Opin Q. 2008 Dec 1;72(5):866-891. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn062.
Individuals' subjective expectations are important in explaining heterogeneity in individual choices, but their elicitation poses some challenges, in particular when one is interested in the subjective probability distribution of an individual. We have developed an innovative visual representation for Internet surveys that has some advantages over previously used formats. In this paper we present our findings from testing this visual representation in the context of individuals' Social Security expectations. Respondents are asked to allocate a total of 20 balls across seven bins to express what they believe the chances to be that their future Social Security benefits would fall into any one of those bins. Our data come from the Internet Survey of respondents to the Health and Retirement Study, a representative survey of the U.S. population age 51 and older. To contrast the results from the visual format with a previously used format we divided the sample into two random groups and administered both, the visual format and the more standard percent chance format. Our findings suggest that the main advantage of the visual format is that it generates usable answers for virtually all respondents in the sample while in the percent chance format a significant fraction (about 20 percent) of responses is lost due to inconsistencies. Across various other dimensions the visual format performs similarly to the percent chance format, leading us to conclude that the bins-and-balls format is a viable alternative that leads to more complete data.
个人的主观期望在解释个体选择的异质性方面很重要,但获取这些期望存在一些挑战,尤其是当人们对个体的主观概率分布感兴趣时。我们为网络调查开发了一种创新的视觉呈现方式,它比以前使用的格式具有一些优势。在本文中,我们展示了在个人对社会保障的期望背景下测试这种视觉呈现方式的结果。受访者被要求在七个箱子中总共分配20个球,以表达他们认为未来社会保障福利落入其中任何一个箱子的可能性。我们的数据来自对健康与退休研究的受访者进行的网络调查,该研究是对美国51岁及以上人群的代表性调查。为了将视觉格式的结果与以前使用的格式进行对比,我们将样本随机分为两组,并同时采用视觉格式和更标准的百分比概率格式进行调查。我们的研究结果表明,视觉格式的主要优点是它几乎能为样本中的所有受访者生成可用答案,而在百分比概率格式中,由于不一致性,相当一部分(约20%)的回答丢失了。在其他各个方面,视觉格式的表现与百分比概率格式相似,这使我们得出结论,箱子和球的格式是一种可行的替代方案,能产生更完整的数据。