Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Community Health. 2011 Jun;36(3):414-22. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9323-9.
Childhood obesity rates continue to increase and there is a need for innovative obesity prevention programs. Our objectives were to (1) create a community partnership, and (2) test an obesity prevention intervention that involved curriculum delivered in the classroom with 1:1 coaching delivered by nursing students on health parameters among 4th and 5th grade school children. Our primary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in significant increases in physical activity levels. 99 children from two schools participated in the program. Classrooms were assigned as intervention or control. All classrooms received standardized content on health habits by the public health nurse and children assigned to the intervention classrooms also received 1:1 coaching by nursing students, with fewer total visits at School A. Baseline and end-of-year data were collected for health parameters and physical activity. For School A, there were no significant differences between intervention and control children between baseline and end-of-year for all health outcomes. Due to a limited control group at School B, control and intervention groups at both schools were consolidated for analysis. BMI and BMI percentile increased at School A, but daily minutes of TV and servings of fruit juice decreased. At School B, there were decreases in BMI percentile and servings of soda/punch, plus increases in servings of fruits/vegetables and daily steps (baseline mean ± SEM = 10,494 ± 419 daily steps; end-of-year = 15,466 ± 585 daily steps). A multi-partner, community approach to obesity intervention shows potential for improving health in elementary school children.
儿童肥胖率持续上升,因此需要创新的肥胖预防计划。我们的目标是:(1)建立社区伙伴关系;(2)测试一项肥胖预防干预措施,该措施涉及在课堂上教授课程,并由护理学生对 4 至 5 年级的学生进行一对一的健康参数辅导。我们的主要假设是,干预措施将显著提高身体活动水平。两所学校的 99 名儿童参加了该计划。将教室分配为干预组或对照组。所有教室都由公共卫生护士提供有关健康习惯的标准化内容,而被分配到干预教室的儿童还接受了护理学生的一对一辅导,但在学校 A 的访问次数较少。在基线和年终收集健康参数和身体活动数据。对于学校 A,干预组和对照组的所有健康结果在基线和年终之间均无显著差异。由于学校 B 的对照组人数有限,因此将两所学校的对照组和干预组合并进行分析。在学校 A,BMI 和 BMI 百分位数增加,但每天看电视的时间和果汁的摄入量减少。在学校 B,BMI 百分位数和苏打水/潘趣酒的摄入量减少,而水果/蔬菜的摄入量和每日步数增加(基线平均值±SEM=10494±419 每日步数;年终=15466±585 每日步数)。多合作伙伴、社区方法的肥胖干预措施显示出改善小学生健康的潜力。