Department of Zoology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, 74078, USA.
Hum Nat. 2012 Sep;23(3):283-305. doi: 10.1007/s12110-012-9142-z.
What are the driving forces of cultural macroevolution, the evolution of cultural traits that characterize societies or populations? This question has engaged anthropologists for more than a century, with little consensus regarding the answer. We develop and fit autologistic models, built upon both spatial and linguistic neighbor graphs, for 44 cultural traits of 172 societies in the Western North American Indian (WNAI) database. For each trait, we compare models including or excluding one or both neighbor graphs, and for the majority of traits we find strong evidence in favor of a model which uses both spatial and linguistic neighbors to predict a trait's distribution. Our results run counter to the assertion that cultural trait distributions can be explained largely by the transmission of traits from parent to daughter populations and are thus best analyzed with phylogenies. In contrast, we show that vertical and horizontal transmission pathways can be incorporated in a single model, that both transmission modes may indeed operate on the same trait, and that for most traits in the WNAI database, accounting for only one mode of transmission would result in a loss of information.
文化宏观进化的驱动力是什么?文化特征是指社会或群体的特征。这个问题已经让人类学家们研究了一个多世纪,但对于答案还没有达成共识。我们为 172 个社会的 44 个文化特征开发并拟合了自回归模型,这些特征基于空间和语言邻居图。对于每个特征,我们比较了包含或不包含一个或两个邻居图的模型,并且对于大多数特征,我们有强有力的证据支持使用空间和语言邻居来预测特征分布的模型。我们的结果与断言相反,即文化特征分布可以主要通过从父群体向子群体传播特征来解释,因此最好使用系统发育来分析。相比之下,我们表明,垂直和水平传播途径可以在单个模型中结合,两种传播模式实际上可能在同一特征上运作,并且对于 WNAI 数据库中的大多数特征,仅考虑一种传播模式将导致信息丢失。