Carr Deborah, Moorman Sara M
Department of Sociology and Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 30 College Avenue, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901.
Sociol Forum (Randolph N J). 2009 Dec 1;24(4):754-778. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01135.x.
We explore the content and correlates of older adults' end-of-life treatment preferences in two hypothetical terminal illness scenarios: severe physical pain with no cognitive impairment, and severe cognitive impairment with no physical pain. For each scenario, we assess whether participants would reject life-prolonging treatment, accept treatment, or do not know their preferences. Using data from the 2004 wave of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (N = 5,106), we estimate multinomial logistic regression models to evaluate whether treatment preferences are associated with direct experience with end-of-life issues, personal beliefs, health, and sociodemographic characteristics. Persons who have made formal end-of-life preparations, persons with no religious affiliation, mainline Protestants, and persons who are pessimistic about their own life expectancy are more likely to reject treatment in both scenarios. Women and persons who witnessed the painful death of a loved one are more likely to reject treatment in the cognitive impairment scenario only. Consistent with rational choice perspectives, our results suggest that individuals prefer treatments that they perceive to have highly probable desirable consequences for both self and family.
一是无认知障碍的严重身体疼痛,二是无身体疼痛的严重认知障碍。对于每种情景,我们评估参与者是会拒绝延长生命的治疗、接受治疗,还是不清楚自己的偏好。利用来自威斯康星纵向研究2004年波次的数据(N = 5106),我们估计多项逻辑回归模型,以评估治疗偏好是否与临终问题的直接经历、个人信念、健康状况以及社会人口学特征相关。在两种情景中,已进行正式临终准备的人、无宗教信仰者、主流新教徒以及对自己预期寿命持悲观态度的人更有可能拒绝治疗。仅在认知障碍情景中,女性以及目睹过亲人痛苦死亡的人更有可能拒绝治疗。与理性选择观点一致,我们的结果表明,个体更喜欢那些他们认为对自己和家人都极有可能产生理想后果的治疗。