• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会劣势与正义信念的自我调节功能。

Social disadvantage and the self-regulatory function of justice beliefs.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jan;100(1):149-71. doi: 10.1037/a0021343.

DOI:10.1037/a0021343
PMID:21058869
Abstract

Five studies support the hypothesis that beliefs in societal fairness offer a self-regulatory benefit for members of socially disadvantaged groups. Specifically, members of disadvantaged groups are more likely than members of advantaged groups to calibrate their pursuit of long-term goals to their beliefs about societal fairness. In Study 1, low socioeconomic status (SES) undergraduate students who believed more strongly in societal fairness showed greater intentions to persist in the face of poor performance on a midterm examination. In Study 2, low SES participants who believed more strongly in fairness reported more willingness to invest time and effort to achieve desirable career outcomes. In Study 3, ethnic minority participants exposed to a manipulation suggesting that fairness conditions in their country were improving reported more willingness to invest resources in pursuit of long-term goals, relative to ethnic minority participants in a control condition. Study 4 replicated Study 3 using an implicit priming procedure, demonstrating that perceptions of the personal relevance of societal fairness mediate these effects. Across these 4 studies, no link between fairness beliefs and self-regulation emerged for members of advantaged (high SES, ethnic majority) groups. Study 5 contributed evidence from the World Values Survey and a representative sample (Inglehart, Basañez, Diez-Medrano, Halman, & Luijkx, 2004). Respondents reported more motivation to work hard to the extent that they believed that rewards were distributed fairly; this effect emerged more strongly for members of lower SES groups than for members of higher SES groups, as indicated by both self-identified social class and ethnicity.

摘要

五项研究支持了这样一种假设,即对社会公平的信念为社会弱势群体的成员提供了一种自我调节的好处。具体来说,弱势群体的成员比优势群体的成员更有可能根据他们对社会公平的信念来调整他们对长期目标的追求。在研究 1 中,社会经济地位(SES)较低的本科生,他们对社会公平的信念越强,在期中考试表现不佳的情况下坚持下去的意愿就越强。在研究 2 中,信念更坚定的 SES 较低的参与者表示更愿意投入时间和精力来实现理想的职业成果。在研究 3 中,暴露于一种暗示他们国家公平条件正在改善的操纵下的少数族裔参与者报告说,相对于控制条件下的少数族裔参与者,他们更愿意投入资源来追求长期目标。研究 4 使用内隐启动程序复制了研究 3,证明了对社会公平的个人相关性的感知中介了这些影响。在这 4 项研究中,优势群体(高 SES、多数族裔)成员的公平信念与自我调节之间没有联系。研究 5 提供了来自世界价值观调查和代表性样本(Inglehart、Basañez、Diez-Medrano、Halman 和 Luijkx,2004)的证据。受访者报告说,他们更有动力努力工作,因为他们相信奖励是公平分配的;这种影响在 SES 较低的群体中比在 SES 较高的群体中更为强烈,这一点既可以通过自我认同的社会阶层,也可以通过族裔来体现。

相似文献

1
Social disadvantage and the self-regulatory function of justice beliefs.社会劣势与正义信念的自我调节功能。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jan;100(1):149-71. doi: 10.1037/a0021343.
2
Resilient students' goals and motivation.适应能力强的学生的目标与动机。
J Adolesc. 2001 Aug;24(4):461-72. doi: 10.1006/jado.2001.0383.
3
Middle class and marginal? Socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university.中产阶级和边缘?精英大学的社会经济地位、污名和自我调节。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 May;100(5):838-52. doi: 10.1037/a0021956.
4
Justice for whom, exactly? Beliefs in justice for the self and various others.究竟是为了谁的正义?对自身及其他各类人的正义信念。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Apr;34(4):528-41. doi: 10.1177/0146167207312526.
5
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
6
Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.程序正义与地位:作为程序公平效应前提的地位显著性
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Dec;83(6):1353-61.
7
Counseling psychology trainees' perceptions of training and commitments to social justice.咨询心理学受训者对培训的看法和对社会正义的承诺。
J Couns Psychol. 2012 Jan;59(1):120-33. doi: 10.1037/a0026325. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
8
Future goal setting, task motivation and learning of minority and non-minority students in Dutch schools.荷兰学校中少数族裔和非少数族裔学生的未来目标设定、任务动机与学习
Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Dec;76(Pt 4):827-50. doi: 10.1348/000709906X148150.
9
Examining cultural, psychosocial, community and behavioural factors in relationship to socioeconomic inequalities in limiting longstanding illness among the Arab minority in Israel.检查文化、心理社会、社区和行为因素与以色列阿拉伯少数民族中与社会经济不平等相关的长期疾病限制之间的关系。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 May;63(5):351-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.080465. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
10
Justice as a dynamic construct: effects of individual trajectories on distal work outcomes.正义作为一种动态结构:个体轨迹对远程工作结果的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):872-80. doi: 10.1037/a0022991.

引用本文的文献

1
Seeing is believing: believing in a just world reduces perceived inequality.眼见为实:相信世界是公平的会减少对不平等的感知。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 31;16:1531682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1531682. eCollection 2025.
2
Belief in a just world or belief in just others? a study on the object of belief in a just world.相信世界是公正的还是相信他人是公正的?一项关于公正世界信念对象的研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 27;13(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02897-5.
3
How belief in a just world shapes academic engagement among Chinese college art majors: A cross-level moderated mediation model.
对公正世界的信念如何塑造中国大学艺术专业学生的学业参与度:一个跨层次的有调节的中介模型。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0317583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317583. eCollection 2025.
4
Who believes in a just world? A multilevel latent profile analysis of Justice Capital using the European Social Survey.谁相信公正世界?基于欧洲社会调查的正义资本多层次潜在剖面分析。
J Pers. 2025 Apr;93(2):449-462. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12947. Epub 2024 May 29.
5
Perceived Social Mobility and Smartphone Dependence in University Students: The Roles of Hope and Family Socioeconomic Status.大学生的感知社会流动性与智能手机依赖:希望和家庭社会经济地位的作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 May 1;17:1805-1817. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S455939. eCollection 2024.
6
Stuck in short-term, daily operations, or not?: Unraveling SME's long-term orientation.是陷入短期日常运营,还是并非如此?解读中小企业的长期导向。
Small Bus Econ (Dordr). 2023 Mar 24:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11187-023-00748-4.
7
Thinking about God increases acceptance of artificial intelligence in decision-making.思考上帝会增加人们在决策中对人工智能的接受度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 15;120(33):e2218961120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2218961120. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
8
The Influence of Social Support on Higher Vocational Students' Learning Motivation: The Mediating Role of Belief in a Just World and the Moderating Role of Gender.社会支持对高职学生学习动机的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用与性别的调节作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Apr 26;16:1471-1483. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S402643. eCollection 2023.
9
Association of relative deprivation with loneliness and its underlying mechanisms: Evidence from Chinese migrant children.相对剥夺与孤独感的关联及其潜在机制:来自中国流动儿童的证据
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1048164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1048164. eCollection 2023.
10
Money and happiness: the income-happiness correlation is higher when income inequality is higher.金钱与幸福:当收入不平等程度较高时,收入与幸福的关联度也更高。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Oct 8;1(5):pgac224. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac224. eCollection 2022 Nov.