Movement Ecology Laboratory, Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 11;5(11):e13956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013956.
Many avian species soar and glide over land. Evidence from large birds (m(b)>0.9 kg) suggests that soaring-gliding is considerably cheaper in terms of energy than flapping flight, and costs about two to three times the basal metabolic rate (BMR). Yet, soaring-gliding is considered unfavorable for small birds because migration speed in small birds during soaring-gliding is believed to be lower than that of flapping flight. Nevertheless, several small bird species routinely soar and glide.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To estimate the energetic cost of soaring-gliding flight in small birds, we measured heart beat frequencies of free-ranging migrating European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster, m(b)∼55 g) using radio telemetry, and established the relationship between heart beat frequency and metabolic rate (by indirect calorimetry) in the laboratory. Heart beat frequency during sustained soaring-gliding was 2.2 to 2.5 times lower than during flapping flight, but similar to, and not significantly different from, that measured in resting birds. We estimated that soaring-gliding metabolic rate of European bee-eaters is about twice their basal metabolic rate (BMR), which is similar to the value estimated in the black-browed albatross Thalassarche (previously Diomedea) melanophrys, m(b)∼4 kg). We found that soaring-gliding migration speed is not significantly different from flapping migration speed.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found no evidence that soaring-gliding speed is slower than flapping flight in bee-eaters, contradicting earlier estimates that implied a migration speed penalty for using soaring-gliding rather than flapping flight. Moreover, we suggest that small birds soar and glide during migration, breeding, dispersal, and other stages in their annual cycle because it may entail a low energy cost of transport. We propose that the energy cost of soaring-gliding may be proportional to BMR regardless of bird size, as theoretically deduced by earlier studies.
许多鸟类在陆地上升空滑翔。来自大型鸟类(m(b)>0.9 公斤)的证据表明,在能量方面,翱翔滑翔比拍打飞行便宜得多,其成本约为基础代谢率(BMR)的两倍到三倍。然而,翱翔滑翔被认为对小鸟不利,因为人们认为小鸟在翱翔滑翔时的迁徙速度比拍打飞行时要低。尽管如此,一些小鸟种还是经常翱翔滑翔。
方法/主要发现:为了估算小鸟翱翔滑翔飞行的能量成本,我们使用无线电遥测技术测量了自由迁徙的欧洲食蜂鸟(Merops apiaster,m(b)∼55 克)的心跳频率,并在实验室中建立了心跳频率与代谢率(通过间接测热法)之间的关系。翱翔滑翔时的心跳频率比拍打飞行时低 2.2 到 2.5 倍,但与休息时的鸟类相似,且没有显著差异。我们估计欧洲食蜂鸟的翱翔滑翔代谢率约为其基础代谢率(BMR)的两倍,与黑眉信天翁 Thalassarche(以前的 Diomedea)melanophrys(m(b)∼4 公斤)的估计值相似。我们发现翱翔滑翔的迁徙速度与拍打飞行的迁徙速度没有显著差异。
结论/意义:我们没有发现翱翔滑翔速度比蜂鸟拍打飞行速度慢的证据,这与之前的估计相矛盾,之前的估计暗示使用翱翔滑翔而不是拍打飞行会导致迁徙速度降低。此外,我们认为小鸟在迁徙、繁殖、扩散和其他年度周期阶段会翱翔滑翔,因为这可能涉及到较低的运输能量成本。我们提出,翱翔滑翔的能量成本可能与 BMR 成正比,而与鸟类大小无关,这是早期研究从理论上推断出来的。