Department of Kinesiologyand Health Education, The University of Texas, Austin,TX, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Mar 1;107(5):783-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.062. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
Although swimming is one of the most popular, most practiced, and most recommended forms of physical activity, little information is available regarding the influence of regular swimming on vascular disease risks. Using a cross-sectional study design, key measurements of vascular function were performed in middle-aged and older swimmers, runners, and sedentary controls. There were no group differences in age, height, dietary intake, and fasting plasma concentrations of glucose, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Runners and swimmers were not different in their weekly training volume. Brachial systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure were higher (p <0.05) in swimmers than in sedentary controls and runners. Runners and swimmers had lower (p <0.05) carotid systolic blood pressure and carotid pulse pressure than sedentary controls. Carotid arterial compliance was higher (p <0.05) and β-stiffness index was lower (p <0.05) in runners and swimmers than in sedentary controls. There were no significant group differences between runners and swimmers. Cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was greater (p <0.05) in runners than in sedentary controls and swimmers and baroreflex sensitivity tended to be higher in swimmers than in sedentary controls (p = 0.07). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was significant greater (p <0.05) in runners compared with sedentary controls and swimmers. In conclusion, our present findings are consistent with the notion that habitual swimming exercise may be an effective endurance exercise for preventing loss in central arterial compliance.
尽管游泳是最受欢迎、最常进行和最受推荐的身体活动形式之一,但关于定期游泳对血管疾病风险的影响的信息却很少。本研究采用横断面研究设计,对中年和老年人游泳者、跑步者和久坐不动的对照组进行了血管功能的关键测量。游泳者、跑步者和久坐不动的对照组在年龄、身高、饮食摄入以及空腹血糖、总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的血浆浓度方面没有差异。跑步者和游泳者每周的训练量没有差异。游泳者的肱动脉收缩压和脉压高于久坐不动的对照组和跑步者(p<0.05)。跑步者和游泳者的颈总动脉收缩压和颈总动脉脉压低于久坐不动的对照组(p<0.05)。与久坐不动的对照组相比,跑步者和游泳者的颈动脉顺应性更高(p<0.05),β硬度指数更低(p<0.05)。跑步者和游泳者之间没有显著的组间差异。与久坐不动的对照组和游泳者相比,跑步者的心血管压力反射敏感性更高(p<0.05),而游泳者的心血管压力反射敏感性倾向于高于久坐不动的对照组(p=0.07)。与久坐不动的对照组和游泳者相比,跑步者的肱动脉血流介导的扩张更大(p<0.05)。总之,本研究结果与以下观点一致,即习惯性游泳运动可能是预防中心动脉顺应性丧失的有效耐力运动。