• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地标和基于身体的感觉信息对路线知识的影响。

The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge.

机构信息

School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2011 May;39(4):686-99. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0054-z.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-010-0054-z
PMID:21264583
Abstract

Two experiments investigated the effects of landmarks and body-based information on route knowledge. Participants made four out-and-back journeys along a route, guided only on the first outward trip and with feedback every time an error was made. Experiment 1 used 3-D virtual environments (VEs) with a desktop monitor display, and participants were provided with no supplementary landmarks, only global landmarks, only local landmarks, or both global and local landmarks. Local landmarks significantly reduced the number of errors that participants made, but global landmarks did not. Experiment 2 used a head-mounted display; here, participants who physically walked through the VE (translational and rotational body-based information) made 36% fewer errors than did participants who traveled by physically turning but changing position using a joystick. Overall, the experiments showed that participants were less sure of where to turn than which way, and journey direction interacted with sensory information to affect the number and types of errors participants made.

摘要

两项实验研究了地标和基于身体的信息对路线知识的影响。参与者沿着一条路线进行了四次往返旅行,仅在第一次外出旅行时得到指导,并在每次出错时得到反馈。实验 1 使用具有桌面显示器的 3-D 虚拟环境 (VE),参与者没有提供任何补充地标,只有全局地标,只有局部地标,或全局和局部地标都有。局部地标显著减少了参与者犯错的次数,但全局地标没有。实验 2 使用了头戴式显示器;在这里,通过身体穿过 VE(平移和旋转的基于身体的信息)的参与者比使用操纵杆改变位置但通过身体转动的参与者犯的错误少 36%。总的来说,这些实验表明,参与者对于转向的方向不如转向的位置确定,而且行程方向与感官信息相互作用,影响参与者犯错的次数和类型。

相似文献

1
The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge.地标和基于身体的感觉信息对路线知识的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2011 May;39(4):686-99. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0054-z.
2
Individual differences in using geometric and featural cues to maintain spatial orientation: cue quantity and cue ambiguity are more important than cue type.在利用几何线索和特征线索来维持空间定向方面的个体差异:线索数量和线索模糊性比线索类型更重要。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Feb;16(1):176-81. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.176.
3
Contributions of proprioception to navigation in virtual environments.本体感觉对虚拟环境中导航的贡献。
Hum Factors. 1998 Sep;40(3):489-97. doi: 10.1518/001872098779591296.
4
How useful are landmarks when learning a route in a virtual environment? Evidence from typical development and Williams syndrome.在虚拟环境中学习路线时,地标有多有用?来自典型发展和威廉姆斯综合征的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Apr;111(4):571-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.009. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
5
Do landmarks help or hinder women in route learning?地标在路线学习中对女性是有帮助还是有阻碍?
Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Dec;95(3 Pt 1):713-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.3.713.
6
Shape shifting: Local landmarks interfere with navigation by, and recognition of, global shape.形状变换:局部地标干扰了对全局形状的导航和识别。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):492-510. doi: 10.1037/a0034901. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
Where is uphill? Exploring sex differences when reorienting on a sloped environment presented through 2-D images.上坡在哪里?通过二维图像呈现倾斜环境时重新定向过程中的性别差异探究。
Perception. 2014;43(4):249-64. doi: 10.1068/p7622.
8
Use of redundant sets of landmark information by humans (Homo sapiens) in a goal-searching task in an open field and on a computer screen.人类(智人)在开阔场地和电脑屏幕上的目标搜索任务中对冗余地标信息集的使用。
J Comp Psychol. 2018 May;132(2):178-188. doi: 10.1037/com0000097. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Place recognition from distant landmarks: human performance and maximum likelihood model.
Biol Cybern. 2018 Aug;112(4):291-303. doi: 10.1007/s00422-018-0751-4. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
10
Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.通过与沉浸式虚拟环境交互来校正距离估计:任务和可用感官信息的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Mar;14(1):61-72. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.61.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved spatial memory for physical versus virtual navigation.与虚拟导航相比,实体导航的空间记忆得到改善。
J Neural Eng. 2025 Jul 11;22(4):046014. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ade6aa.
2
Identifying older adults at risk for dementia based on smartphone data obtained during a wayfinding task in the real world.基于在现实世界寻路任务中获取的智能手机数据识别有患痴呆症风险的老年人。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 3;3(10):e0000613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000613. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Proposing immersive virtual reality scenarios for validating verbal content analysis methods in adult samples.

本文引用的文献

1
Walking straight into circles.走直线却走成了圆圈。
Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 29;19(18):1538-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.053. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
2
Visual homing in the absence of feature-based landmark information.在缺乏基于特征的地标信息情况下的视觉归巢
Cognition. 2008 Oct;109(1):105-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.018. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
3
Landmarks as beacons and associative cues: their role in route learning.作为信标和关联线索的地标:它们在路线学习中的作用。
提出沉浸式虚拟现实场景以验证针对成人样本的言语内容分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 19;15:1352091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1352091. eCollection 2024.
4
VR for Cognition and Memory.用于认知与记忆的虚拟现实技术
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2023;65:189-232. doi: 10.1007/7854_2023_425.
5
Improved Spatial Knowledge Acquisition through Sensory Augmentation.通过感官增强改进空间知识获取
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 25;13(5):720. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050720.
6
Enriched environments enhance the development of explicit memory in an incidental learning task.丰富的环境能增强在一项偶然学习任务中外显记忆的发展。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 4;12(1):18717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23226-5.
7
Cognitive workload evaluation of landmarks and routes using virtual reality.利用虚拟现实评估地标和路线的认知工作量。
PLoS One. 2022 May 17;17(5):e0268399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268399. eCollection 2022.
8
Testing landmark-specific effects on route navigation in an ecologically valid setting: a simulated driving study.在生态效价环境中测试地标特异性对路线导航的影响:一项模拟驾驶研究。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Mar 7;7(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00374-w.
9
Memory for spatio-temporal contextual details during the retrieval of naturalistic episodes.自然情节提取过程中的时空语境细节记忆
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 16;11(1):14577. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93960-9.
10
Landmarks in wayfinding: a review of the existing literature.地标在寻路中的作用:现有文献综述。
Cogn Process. 2021 Aug;22(3):369-410. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01012-x. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jul;35(5):910-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03193465.
4
Acquisition of structural versus object landmark knowledge.结构与物体地标知识的获取。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):378-390. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.378.
5
Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of landmarks.虚拟环境中成人与儿童的寻路行为及空间知识:地标的作用。
Exp Psychol. 2006;53(3):171-81. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.3.171.
6
Lost in virtual space: studies in human and ideal spatial navigation.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Jun;32(3):688-704. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.688.
7
Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space.虚拟大尺度空间中物体位置和路线方向的记忆。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Mar;59(3):493-508. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000746.
8
Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.从环境中的直接体验获取空间知识:度量知识发展中的个体差异以及对分别习得地点的整合。
Cogn Psychol. 2006 Mar;52(2):93-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
9
Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts.人类会将路线整合到认知地图中吗?基于地图与基于地标的新捷径导航。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Mar;31(2):195-215. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.195.
10
Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode.在想象运动过程中,认知性与感知性方向引导的使用取决于反应模式。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Jun;15(6):403-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00692.x.