• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为多音节单词命名。

Naming multisyllabic words.

作者信息

Jared D, Seidenberg M S

机构信息

McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):92-105. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.92.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.92
PMID:2137526
Abstract

The process of reading multisyllabic words aloud from print was examined in 4 experiments. Experiment 1 used multisyllabic words that vary in terms of the consistency of component spelling-sound correspondences. The stimuli were regular, regular inconsistent, and exception words analogous to the monosyllabic items used in previous studies. Both regular inconsistent and exception words produced longer naming latencies than regular words. In Experiment 2 these differences between word types were found to be limited to lower frequency items. Experiment 3 showed that effects of number of syllables on naming latency are also limited to lower frequency words when the stimulus display forced subjects to use syllabic units. Thus, frequency modulates the effects of two aspects of lexical structure-consistency of spelling-sound correspondences and number of syllables. The results suggest that the naming of multisyllabic words draws on some of the same knowledge representations and processes as monosyllabic words; however, naming does not require syllabic decomposition. The results are discussed in the context of current models of naming.

摘要

在4项实验中对从印刷文字中大声读出多音节单词的过程进行了研究。实验1使用了在组成部分的拼写-发音对应一致性方面存在差异的多音节单词。刺激词包括规则词、规则不一致词和例外词,类似于先前研究中使用的单音节词项。规则不一致词和例外词的命名潜伏期都比规则词更长。在实验2中,发现这些词类之间的差异仅限于低频词项。实验3表明,当刺激显示迫使受试者使用音节单位时,音节数量对命名潜伏期的影响也仅限于低频词。因此,频率调节词汇结构两个方面的影响——拼写-发音对应一致性和音节数量。结果表明,多音节单词的命名利用了一些与单音节单词相同的知识表征和过程;然而,命名并不需要音节分解。在当前的命名模型背景下对结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Naming multisyllabic words.为多音节单词命名。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):92-105. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.92.
2
Age-of-acquisition affects word naming in Italian only when stress is irregular.习得年龄仅在重音不规则时才会影响意大利语中的单词命名。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Mar;139(3):417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.012. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
3
Absence of syllable effects: multisyllabic [correction of monosyllabic] words are easier than monosyllabic [correction of multisyllabic] words.
Percept Mot Skills. 2001 Aug;93(1):73-7. doi: 10.2466/pms.2001.93.1.73.
4
Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: the syllabic length effect reexamined.朗读多音节词和非词:对音节长度效应的重新审视
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Mar;7(1):142-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03210733.
5
Contextual control over lexical and sublexical routines when reading english aloud.大声朗读英语时对词汇和次词汇程序的情境控制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):113-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196355.
6
Reading and lexicalization in opaque and transparent orthographies: Word naming and word learning in English and Spanish.透明与不透明正字法中的阅读与词汇化:英语和西班牙语中的单词命名与单词学习
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Oct;70(10):2105-2129. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1223705. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
7
Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention.大声朗读:拼写-语音转换使用集中注意力。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar;34(2):422-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.422.
8
Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming.视觉单词识别与命名中的音节长度效应
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Jun;113(2):167-83. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(03)00031-3.
9
Basic processes in reading: semantics affects speeded naming of high-frequency words in an alphabetic script.阅读的基本过程:语义影响字母文字中高频词的快速命名。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2001 Mar;55(1):63-9. doi: 10.1037/h0087353.
10
Semantic effects in single-word naming.单字命名中的语义效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Sep;21(5):1140-54. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.5.1140.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of context in the reading of English vowels: Evidence from ‹s› clusters.语境在英语元音发音中的作用:来自‹s›辅音连缀的证据。
Glossa Psycholinguist. 2025;4(1). doi: 10.5070/G60116584. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
2
Modeling Complex Word Reading: Examining Influences at the Level of the Word and Child on Mono- and Polymorphemic Word Reading.复杂单词阅读建模:研究单词层面和儿童层面因素对单语素和多语素单词阅读的影响。
Sci Stud Read. 2022;26(6):527-544. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2022.2077109. Epub 2022 May 21.
3
Automaticity as an independent trait in predicting reading outcomes in middle-school.
自动化作为一个独立的特征,可预测中学生的阅读成绩。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Mar;57(3):361-375. doi: 10.1037/dev0001153. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
4
Effects of semantic reinforcement, semantic discrimination, and affix frequency on new word learning in skilled and less skilled readers in Grades 6 to 12.语义强化、语义辨别和词缀频率对 6 至 12 年级熟练和不熟练读者学习新词的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 May;205:105083. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105083. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
5
Vowel and Sibilant Production in Noise: Effects of Noise Frequency and Phonological Similarity.噪声环境下元音和咝音的发声:噪声频率和语音相似性的影响
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Apr 27;63(4):1002-1017. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00345. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
6
NDRA: A single route model of response times in the reading aloud task based on discriminative learning.NDRA:基于判别式学习的朗读任务中反应时的单一途径模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0218802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218802. eCollection 2019.
7
Cues to stress assignment in reading aloud.朗读时应激分配的线索。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jan;147(1):36-61. doi: 10.1037/xge0000380.
8
L2 Word Recognition: Influence of L1 Orthography on Multi-syllabic Word Recognition.二级词汇识别:第一语言正字法对多音节词识别的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Oct;46(5):1101-1118. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9483-1.
9
Costs and Benefits of Orthographic Inconsistency in Reading: Evidence from a Cross-Linguistic Comparison.阅读中拼写不一致的成本与收益:来自跨语言比较的证据
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 29;11(6):e0157457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157457. eCollection 2016.
10
Acquisition of Chinese characters: the effects of character properties and individual differences among second language learners.汉字习得:汉字属性及第二语言学习者个体差异的影响
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 3;6:986. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00986. eCollection 2015.