Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Apr;33(2):252-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9488-z. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
This study measured preference for newly designed prescription labels in comparison with two existing labels from the perspective of patients, pharmacists and physicians, based on three parameters: content, convenience and cosmetic appearance.
Participants were interviewed at pharmacies (patients) and at professional meetings (physicians and pharmacists) regarding their preference for the labels.
Two new labels (A and B) were designed using Publisher® Software version 2007 based on literature and results from our previous study. New features focusing on content, convenience and cosmetic appearance (3Cs) included a time table for medication administration, indication of medication and warnings, on a redesigned label. These labels were initially tested on a small sample and then revised. A survey instrument was developed to compare currently used labels and modified labels A and B, on the 3Cs.
The preference of three groups of stakeholders (patients, pharmacists and physicians) were measured for newly designed labels in comparison with two existing labels.
Complete data obtained with 444 patients, 115 pharmacists and 69 physicians indicated that the median age range of participants was between 51 and 64 years. The patient and physician samples consisted of a higher percentage of women. Pharmacists working in chain pharmacies and family practitioners comprised majority of our sample in professional groups. Mean years of experience in pharmacy and physician groups was 18.2 and 26.8 years, respectively. Most patients (94.4%) in the sample had at least high school education. Majority of patients (82.8%) preferred new labels over existing ones and 55.2% preferred label B on all three parameters. Close to two thirds of pharmacists (76.4%) and physicians (75.3%) preferred new labels with 55.3 and 57.9% preferring label B, respectively. Participants cited all the added modifications as reasons for their preference.
New prescription labels were favored over existing labels by all stakeholders, for content, convenience and cosmetic appearance. The results may help in making labels more user-friendly and addressing problem areas in labels.
本研究从患者、药剂师和医生的角度,基于三个参数(内容、便利性和美观外观)比较了新设计的处方标签与两个现有标签的偏好。
参与者在药房(患者)和专业会议(医生和药剂师)接受了有关他们对标签偏好的采访。
使用 Publisher®软件版本 2007 根据文献和我们之前的研究结果设计了两个新标签(A 和 B)。新标签重点关注内容、便利性和美观外观(3C),包括药物管理时间表、药物指示和警告,设计在重新设计的标签上。这些标签最初在小样本上进行了测试,然后进行了修订。开发了一种调查工具来比较目前使用的标签以及改进后的标签 A 和 B 在 3C 方面的情况。
测量三组利益相关者(患者、药剂师和医生)对新设计标签的偏好与两个现有标签相比。
完成了 444 名患者、115 名药剂师和 69 名医生的完整数据,表明参与者的中位年龄范围在 51 至 64 岁之间。患者和医生样本中女性比例较高。连锁药店和家庭医生的药剂师构成了我们专业组样本的大部分。药剂师和医生组的平均从业年限分别为 18.2 年和 26.8 年。样本中大多数患者(94.4%)至少具有高中教育程度。大多数患者(82.8%)更喜欢新标签而不是现有标签,有 55.2%的患者更喜欢所有三个参数的标签 B。近三分之二的药剂师(76.4%)和医生(75.3%)更喜欢新标签,分别有 55.3%和 57.9%的人更喜欢标签 B。参与者引用了所有添加的修改作为他们偏好的原因。
所有利益相关者都喜欢新的处方标签而不是现有的标签,因为它们在内容、便利性和美观外观方面都有优势。研究结果可能有助于使标签更便于用户使用,并解决标签中的问题。