• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自报生活满意度与死亡率的前瞻性关联:来自 MONICA/KORA Augsburg S3 调查队列研究的结果。

Prospective association between self-reported life satisfaction and mortality: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg S3 survey cohort study.

机构信息

Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Epidemiology II, Neuherberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 20;11:579. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-579.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-11-579
PMID:21774793
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3155500/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To identify factors which determine high life satisfaction (LS) and to analyse the prognostic influence of LS on mortality.

METHODS

Data collection was conducted on 2,675 participants, age 25-74 years, as part of the MONICA Augsburg Project 1994-95. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with high LS (measured with one item, 6-level Likert scale, where "high" = very satisfied/most of the time very satisfied with ones personal life). After 12 years mean follow-up, a total of 245 deaths occurred. We calculated age- and sex-adjusted incident mortality rates per 10,000. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Independent determinants of LS were income, health-perception, and social support, as well as somatisation, anger or depressive symptoms (all p < 0.05). Participants with higher LS (n = 721, 27%) benefited the most with respect to absolute mortality risk reduction (higher LS = 67; mid = 98; low = 140 per 10,000). The sex-stratified analyses indicated an independent association of higher LS and survival for men (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37 - 0.81) but not for women.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline assessment demonstrated that psychological, social and life-style factors, but not somatic co-morbidities, were relevant determinants of LS. Moreover, the analysis showed that men with higher LS have a substantial long-term survival benefit. The observed association between LS and mortality may be attributed to common underlying causes such as social network integration and/or self-rated health.

摘要

背景

确定决定高生活满意度(LS)的因素,并分析 LS 对死亡率的预后影响。

方法

数据采集是在 1994-95 年 MONICA Augsburg 项目中,对 2675 名年龄在 25-74 岁的参与者进行的。使用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与高 LS(通过一项 6 级李克特量表衡量,“高”=对个人生活非常满意/大部分时间非常满意)相关的因素。在 12 年的平均随访后,共有 245 人死亡。我们计算了每 10000 人年龄和性别调整后的发病率。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计风险比(HRs)。

结果

LS 的独立决定因素是收入、健康感知和社会支持,以及躯体化、愤怒或抑郁症状(均<0.05)。LS 较高的参与者(n=721,27%)在绝对死亡率降低方面获益最大(LS 较高=67;中值=98;低=140/10000)。性别分层分析表明,LS 较高与男性生存独立相关(HR 0.55;95%CI 0.37-0.81),但与女性无关。

结论

基线评估表明,心理、社会和生活方式因素,而不是躯体合并症,是 LS 的相关决定因素。此外,分析表明,LS 较高的男性具有实质性的长期生存获益。LS 与死亡率之间的观察到的关联可能归因于共同的潜在原因,例如社交网络融合和/或自我评估的健康状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8697/3155500/1d8a129b8d1b/1471-2458-11-579-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8697/3155500/8ffd59d9066b/1471-2458-11-579-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8697/3155500/1d8a129b8d1b/1471-2458-11-579-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8697/3155500/8ffd59d9066b/1471-2458-11-579-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8697/3155500/1d8a129b8d1b/1471-2458-11-579-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Prospective association between self-reported life satisfaction and mortality: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg S3 survey cohort study.自报生活满意度与死亡率的前瞻性关联:来自 MONICA/KORA Augsburg S3 调查队列研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 20;11:579. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-579.
2
Poor structural social support is associated with an increased risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study.不良的结构性社会支持与2型糖尿病风险增加相关:慕尼黑地区冠心病风险因子监测/奥格斯堡队列研究的结果
Diabet Med. 2016 Jan;33(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/dme.12951. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
3
Temporal change in the association between life satisfaction and functional decline with gender differences: an age-specific prospective cohort study.生命满意度与功能下降之间的关联随性别差异的时间变化:一项特定年龄前瞻性队列研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2023;28:42. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.23-00019.
4
Association of fetuin-A with incident type 2 diabetes: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg study and a systematic meta-analysis.血清胎球蛋白 A 与 2 型糖尿病发病风险的关联:MONICA/KORA 奥格斯堡研究与系统荟萃分析的结果。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;178(4):389-398. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-1053. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Living alone is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men but not women from the general population: the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Cohort Study.独居与普通人群中男性患2型糖尿病的风险增加有关,但与女性无关:慕尼黑奥格斯堡地区动脉粥样硬化风险因素监测/科罗娜研究。
Psychosom Med. 2009 Sep;71(7):784-8. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181ae5770. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
6
Sex differences in risk factors for incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the MONICA Augsburg cohort study.2型糖尿病发病危险因素的性别差异:奥格斯堡MONICA队列研究
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jan 14;162(1):82-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.1.82.
7
Association of daily tar and nicotine intake with incident myocardial infarction: results from the population-based MONICA/KORA Augsburg Cohort Study 1984-2002.每日焦油和尼古丁摄入量与心肌梗死事件的相关性:基于人群的 MONICA/KORA Augsburg 队列研究 1984-2002 年的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 4;11:273. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-273.
8
[Family status and social integration as predictors of mortality: a 5-year follow-up study of 55- to 74-year-old men and women in the Augsburg area].[家庭状况和社会融合作为死亡率的预测因素:对奥格斯堡地区55至74岁男性和女性的5年随访研究]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 1998 Jun;31(3):184-92. doi: 10.1007/s003910050033.
9
Job strain as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study.工作压力作为2型糖尿病发病的危险因素:慕尼黑奥格斯堡地区动脉粥样硬化风险因素监测/合作调查队列研究的结果
Psychosom Med. 2014 Sep;76(7):562-8. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000084.
10
[Mental health research opportunities in the MONICA-KORA study].[莫尼卡-科拉研究中的心理健康研究机会]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2020 Dec;66(4):324-336. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2020.66.4.324.

引用本文的文献

1
Sleep Disorders and Subjective Well-Being in Portuguese Adults: Evidence from a Representative Study.葡萄牙成年人的睡眠障碍与主观幸福感:一项代表性研究的证据
Sleep Sci. 2024 Feb 20;17(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772812. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
The impact of a diabetes diagnosis on health and well-being: Findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.糖尿病诊断对健康和幸福感的影响:来自英国老龄化纵向研究的发现。
J Diabetes. 2024 Jul;16(7):e13518. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13518. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
Association of Outdoor Physical Activity and Sports with Life Satisfaction among Women of Reproductive Age According to a European Representative Sample-A Longitudinal Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-national comparison of sex differences in health and mortality in Denmark, Japan and the US.丹麦、日本和美国的健康和死亡率的跨国性别差异比较。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;25(7):471-80. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9460-6. Epub 2010 May 22.
2
A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States.美国心理健康状况年龄分布的概况。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 1;107(22):9985-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003744107. Epub 2010 May 17.
3
Selection bias in a population survey with registry linkage: potential effect on socioeconomic gradient in cardiovascular risk.
根据欧洲代表性样本对育龄女性户外体育活动和运动与生活满意度的关联——一项纵向分析
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Sep 14;13(9):1859-1879. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13090135.
4
Ambition or comparison? Socioeconomic status and wellbeing differences between local and migrant workers.野心还是比较?本地工人和外来务工人员的社会经济地位和幸福感差异。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0289092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289092. eCollection 2023.
5
Happy people live longer because they are healthy people.快乐的人寿命更长,因为他们身体健康。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04030-w.
6
Temporal change in the association between life satisfaction and functional decline with gender differences: an age-specific prospective cohort study.生命满意度与功能下降之间的关联随性别差异的时间变化:一项特定年龄前瞻性队列研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2023;28:42. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.23-00019.
7
Profiles of behavioral, social and psychological well-being in old age and their association with mobility-limitation-free survival.老年行为、社会和心理福祉特征及其与无活动能力限制生存的关系。
Aging (Albany NY). 2022 Jul 18;14(15):5984-6005. doi: 10.18632/aging.204182.
8
The effect of "Elder Care by Elderly People Program" on life satisfaction and quality of life among institutionalized senior citizens.“老年助老计划”对机构养老老年人生活满意度和生活质量的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jan 31;11:1. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_487_20. eCollection 2022.
9
Prediction of Life Satisfaction in People with Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病患者生活满意度的预测
Parkinsons Dis. 2020 Jul 29;2020:1561037. doi: 10.1155/2020/1561037. eCollection 2020.
10
The Role of Psychological and Social Well-being on Physical Function Trajectories in Older Adults.老年人心理和社会福祉对身体功能轨迹的影响。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Jul 13;75(8):1579-1585. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa114.
人群调查与登记资料链接中的选择偏倚:对心血管风险社会经济梯度的潜在影响。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;25(3):163-72. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9427-7. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
4
The power of positive emotions: it's a matter of life or death--subjective well-being and longevity over 28 years in a general population.积极情绪的力量:事关生死——在普通人群中 28 年的主观幸福感和长寿。
Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;29(1):9-19. doi: 10.1037/a0016767.
5
Life satisfaction, anxiety, depression and resilience across the life span of men.男性一生的生活满意度、焦虑、抑郁和适应力。
Aging Male. 2010 Mar;13(1):32-9. doi: 10.3109/13685530903296698.
6
Life satisfaction, distress, and resiliency across the life span of women.女性一生中的生活满意度、困扰和适应力。
Menopause. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):1132-8. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181a857f8.
7
Positive psychological well-being and mortality: a quantitative review of prospective observational studies.积极的心理健康与死亡率:前瞻性观察性研究的定量综述
Psychosom Med. 2008 Sep;70(7):741-56. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818105ba. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
8
Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?幸福感在生命周期中呈U形吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Apr;66(8):1733-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
9
The Satisfaction With Life Scale.生活满意度量表。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
10
Does positive affect influence health?积极情绪会影响健康吗?
Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;131(6):925-971. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925.