Suppr超能文献

氟化物涂料和溶液对牛牙本质酸蚀与磨损复合模型的体外影响

Effect of NaF and TiF(4) varnish and solution on bovine dentin erosion plus abrasion in vitro.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Orthodontics and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo–Bauru, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 Mar;70(2):160-4. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.600711. Epub 2011 Jul 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This in vitro study aimed to analyze the effect of TiF(4) compared to NaF varnishes and solutions, to protect against dentin erosion associated with abrasion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bovine dentin specimens were pre-treated with NaF-Duraphat (2.26% F), NaF/CaF(2)-Duofluorid (5.63% F), experimental-NaF (2.45% F), experimental-TiF(4) (2.45% F) and placebo varnishes; NaF (2.26% F) and TiF(4) (2.45% F) solutions. Controls remained untreated. The erosive pH cycling was performed using a soft drink (pH 2.6) 4 × 90 s/day and the toothbrushing-abrasion 2 × 10 s/day, in vitro for 5 days. Between the challenges, the specimens were exposed to artificial saliva. Dentin tissue loss was measured profilometrically (μm).

RESULTS

ANOVA/Tukey's test showed that all fluoridated varnishes (Duraphat, 7.5 ± 1.1; Duofluorid, 6.8 ± 1.1; NaF, 7.2 ± 1.9; TiF(4), 6.5 ± 1.0) were able to significantly reduce dentin tissue loss (40.7% reduction compared to control) when compared to placebo varnish (11.2 ± 1.3), control (11.8 ± 1.7) and fluoridated (NaF, 9.9 ± 1.8; TiF(4), 10.3 ± 2.1) solutions (p < 0.0001), which in turn did not significantly differ from each other.

CONCLUSION

All fluoridated varnishes, but not the solutions, had a similar performance and a good potential to reduce dentin tissue loss under mild erosive and abrasive conditions in vitro. Risk patients for erosion and abrasion, especially those with exposed dentin, should benefit from this clinical preventive measure. Further research has to confirm this promising result in the clinical situation.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在分析 TiF4 与氟化物涂料和溶液相比,对预防与磨损相关的牙本质侵蚀的作用。

材料与方法

使用氟化物涂料预处理牛牙本质标本,包括 Duraphat(2.26% F)、NaF/CaF2-Duofluorid(5.63% F)、实验性 NaF(2.45% F)、实验性 TiF4(2.45% F)和安慰剂涂料;使用氟化物溶液预处理包括 NaF(2.26% F)和 TiF4(2.45% F)。空白对照组则不做预处理。使用软饮料(pH 值 2.6)进行 4×90 s/天的酸性 pH 值循环,使用牙刷牙磨进行 2×10 s/天的磨损,体外处理 5 天。在每次磨损和酸性 pH 值循环之间,将标本暴露于人工唾液中。使用轮廓仪测量牙本质组织损失(μm)。

结果

方差分析/Tukey 检验表明,所有氟化涂料(Duraphat,7.5±1.1;Duofluorid,6.8±1.1;NaF,7.2±1.9;TiF4,6.5±1.0)与安慰剂涂料(11.2±1.3)、空白对照组(11.8±1.7)和氟化溶液(NaF,9.9±1.8;TiF4,10.3±2.1)相比,均能显著降低牙本质组织损失(与对照组相比,减少 40.7%)(p<0.0001),而这些氟化溶液之间则无显著差异。

结论

所有氟化涂料,而非氟化溶液,在体外轻度侵蚀和磨损条件下,具有相似的性能和减少牙本质组织损失的良好潜力。有侵蚀和磨损风险的患者,尤其是牙本质暴露的患者,应受益于这种临床预防措施。需要进一步的研究来证实这一有前景的临床结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验