• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速流感 H1N1 诊断检测的性能:荟萃分析。

Performance of rapid influenza H1N1 diagnostic tests: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Minnesota at Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012 Mar;6(2):80-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00284.x. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00284.x
PMID:21883964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3288365/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following the outbreaks of 2009 pandemic H1N1 infection, rapid influenza diagnostic tests have been used to detect H1N1 infection. However, no meta-analysis has been undertaken to assess the diagnostic accuracy when this manuscript was drafted.

METHODS

The literature was systematically searched to identify studies that reported the performance of rapid tests. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to summarize the overall performance.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were selected with 1879 cases and 3477 non-cases. The overall sensitivity and specificity estimates of the rapid tests were 0·51 (95%CI: 0·41, 0·60) and 0·98 (95%CI: 0·94, 0·99). Studies reported heterogeneous sensitivity estimates, ranging from 0·11 to 0·88. If the prevalence was 30%, the overall positive and negative predictive values were 0·94 (95%CI: 0·85, 0·98) and 0·82 (95%CI: 0·79, 0·85). The overall specificities from different manufacturers were comparable, while there were some differences for the overall sensitivity estimates. BinaxNOW had a lower overall sensitivity of 0·39 (95%CI: 0·24, 0·57) compared with all the others (P-value <0·001), whereas QuickVue had a higher overall sensitivity of 0·57 (95%CI: 0·50, 0·63) compared with all the others (P-value = 0·005).

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid tests have high specificity but low sensitivity and thus limited usefulness.

摘要

背景

2009 年大流行 H1N1 感染爆发后,快速流感诊断检测已被用于检测 H1N1 感染。然而,在本文撰写时,尚未进行评估该检测方法的诊断准确性的荟萃分析。

方法

系统地检索文献,以确定报告快速检测性能的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析汇总总体性能。

结果

共选择了 17 项研究,涉及 1879 例病例和 3477 例非病例。快速检测的总体敏感性和特异性估计值分别为 0.51(95%CI:0.41,0.60)和 0.98(95%CI:0.94,0.99)。研究报告的敏感性估计值存在异质性,范围为 0.11 至 0.88。如果流行率为 30%,则总体阳性和阴性预测值分别为 0.94(95%CI:0.85,0.98)和 0.82(95%CI:0.79,0.85)。来自不同制造商的总体特异性相当,但总体敏感性估计值存在差异。BinaxNOW 的总体敏感性为 0.39(95%CI:0.24,0.57),低于所有其他检测方法(P 值<0.001),而 QuickVue 的总体敏感性为 0.57(95%CI:0.50,0.63),高于所有其他检测方法(P 值=0.005)。

结论

快速检测具有高特异性但敏感性低,因此实用性有限。

相似文献

1
Performance of rapid influenza H1N1 diagnostic tests: a meta-analysis.快速流感 H1N1 诊断检测的性能:荟萃分析。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012 Mar;6(2):80-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00284.x. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
2
Sensitivity of influenza rapid diagnostic tests to H5N1 and 2009 pandemic H1N1 viruses.流感快速诊断检测对 H5N1 和 2009 年大流行 H1N1 病毒的敏感性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Aug;48(8):2872-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00439-10. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
3
Performance of rapid-test kits for the detection of the pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus.快速检测试剂盒对大流行性流感 A/H1N1 病毒检测的性能。
J Virol Methods. 2011 May;173(2):387-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
4
Evaluation of QuickVue influenza A+B rapid test for detection of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009.评价 QuickVue 流感 A+B 快速检测试剂盒用于检测 2009 年大流行的甲型 H1N1 流感。
J Clin Virol. 2010 Jun;48(2):120-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
5
Rapid influenza H1N1 diagnostic test: its diagnostic property.甲型H1N1流感快速诊断检测:其诊断特性。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012 Mar;6(2):79. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00320.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
6
Performance of the QuickVue Influenza A+B rapid test for pandemic H1N1 (2009) virus infection in adults.快速检测甲型/乙型流感病毒试剂盒在成人中检测大流行 H1N1(2009)病毒感染的性能。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028089. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
7
Clinical evaluation of rapid point-of-care testing for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus in a population-based study in Spain.基于人群的西班牙研究中快速床边检测新型甲型流感(H1N1)病毒的临床评估。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Sep;16(9):1358-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03159.x. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
8
Performance of the Directigen EZ Flu A+B rapid influenza diagnostic test to detect pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009.直接免疫荧光法 EZ 流感 A+B 快速诊断检测试剂盒检测 2009 年大流行流感 A/H1N1 的性能。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;78(4):360-2. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
9
Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus.新型猪源甲型流感(H1N1)病毒快速流感诊断检测的敏感性和特异性评估。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Nov;28(11):1038-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181c176e3.
10
Utility of the rapid antigen detection BinaxNOW Influenza A&B test for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus.快速抗原检测 BinaxNOW 流感 A&B 试验对新型流感 A(H1N1)病毒检测的效用。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Oct;16(10):1574-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03160.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A new antigen test device for rapid influenza A and B detection.一种用于快速检测甲型和乙型流感的新型抗原检测装置。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 2;10(13):e33979. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33979. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
Performance evaluation of influenza a rapid antigen test and PCR among nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples.甲型流感快速抗原检测与聚合酶链反应在鼻咽和口咽样本中的性能评估
Pract Lab Med. 2024 Jun 7;40:e00416. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00416. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Double-Negative Results Matter: A Reevaluation of Sensitivities for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swabs.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis of point-of-care laboratory tests in the diagnosis of novel 2009 swine-lineage pandemic influenza A (H1N1).以即时检验实验室检测用于诊断新型 2009 猪源流感 A(H1N1)病毒的荟萃分析
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;69(4):410-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.10.009.
2
Preliminary evaluation of two rapid antigen assays for novel influenza A (H1N1) virus detection in clinical specimens.
J Med Microbiol. 2010 Apr;59(Pt 4):508-509. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.018093-0. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
3
Utility of the rapid antigen detection BinaxNOW Influenza A&B test for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus.快速抗原检测 BinaxNOW 流感 A&B 试验对新型流感 A(H1N1)病毒检测的效用。
双阴性结果同样重要:重新评估唾液与鼻咽拭子检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的灵敏度。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 5;193(3):548-560. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad212.
4
Taiwanese Guidelines for Molecular Point-of-Care Testing for Influenza in Emergency Medicine From the New Diagnostic Technology Team of the Taiwan Society of Emergency Medicine.台湾急诊医学会新诊断技术团队制定的台湾地区急诊医学中流感分子即时检测指南。
J Acute Med. 2023 Jun 1;13(2):47-57. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202306_13(2).0001.
5
Influenza Myocarditis: A Literature Review.流感性心肌炎:文献综述
Cureus. 2020 Dec 10;12(12):e12007. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12007.
6
Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America: 2018 Update on Diagnosis, Treatment, Chemoprophylaxis, and Institutional Outbreak Management of Seasonal Influenzaa.美国传染病学会临床实践指南:季节性流感 a 的诊断、治疗、化学预防和机构暴发管理的 2018 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 5;68(6):e1-e47. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy866.
7
Rapid Antigen Tests for Influenza: Rationale and Significance of the FDA Reclassification.流感快速抗原检测:FDA 重新分类的原理和意义。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Sep 25;56(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00711-18. Print 2018 Oct.
8
A Narrative Review of Influenza: A Seasonal and Pandemic Disease.流感:一种季节性和大流行性疾病的叙述性综述
Iran J Med Sci. 2017 Jan;42(1):2-13.
9
The assessment of data sources for influenza virologic surveillance in New York State.纽约州流感病毒学监测数据来源评估
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017 Mar;11(2):138-147. doi: 10.1111/irv.12433. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
10
Performance of the Quidel Sofia rapid influenza diagnostic test during the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 influenza seasons.2012 - 2013年及2013 - 2014年流感季节期间Quidel Sofia快速流感诊断检测的性能。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2016 May;10(3):220-3. doi: 10.1111/irv.12380. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Oct;16(10):1574-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03160.x.
4
Improving the diagnostic efficiency of H1N1 2009 pandemic flu: analysis of predictive clinical signs through a prospective cohort.提高2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行的诊断效率:通过前瞻性队列分析预测性临床体征
PLoS Curr. 2009 Oct 21;1:RRN1120. doi: 10.1371/currents.rrn1120.
5
Performance of laboratory diagnostics for the detection of influenza A(H1N1)v virus as correlated with the time after symptom onset and viral load.实验室诊断检测甲型 H1N1 流感病毒的性能与症状出现后时间和病毒载量的相关性。
J Clin Virol. 2010 Feb;47(2):182-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.11.022.
6
Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using generalized linear mixed models.二变量随机效应 meta 分析在广义线性混合模型在诊断研究中的应用。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):499-508. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09353452. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
7
Diagnostic testing for 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in hospitalized patients.住院患者2009年甲型H1N1大流行性流感病毒感染的诊断检测
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 17;361(25):e114. doi: 10.1056/NEJMopv0911052. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
8
Clinical performance of a rapid influenza test and comparison of nasal versus throat swabs to detect 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection in Thai children.一种快速流感检测的临床性能,以及比较鼻拭子和咽拭子在检测泰国儿童 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感感染中的应用。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Apr;29(4):366-7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181c6f05c.
9
Test characteristics of commercial influenza assays for detecting pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in children.商业流感检测试剂盒在儿童中检测大流行流感 A(H1N1)的检测特性。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Mar;29(3):261-2. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181be9f9c.
10
Rapid-test sensitivity for novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans.新型猪源甲型流感(H1N1)病毒在人类中的快速检测敏感性。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 17;361(25):2493. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0909049. Epub 2009 Nov 18.