• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区居住的老年人上下楼梯时间:正常值和与功能下降的关联。

Stair negotiation time in community-dwelling older adults: normative values and association with functional decline.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;92(12):2006-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.193.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.193
PMID:22133249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3229719/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To establish reference values for stair ascent and descent times in community-dwelling, ambulatory older adults, and to examine their predictive validity for functional decline.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study. Mean follow-up time was 1.8 years (maximum, 3.2y; total, 857.9 person-years).

SETTING

Community sample.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults 70 years and older (N=513; mean age, 80.8 ± 5.1y) without disability or dementia.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to ascend and descend 3 steps measured at baseline. A 14-point disability scale assessed functional status at baseline and at follow-up interviews every 2 to 3 months. Functional decline was defined as an increase in the disability score by 1 point during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The mean±SD stair ascent and descent times for 3 steps were 2.78 ± 1.49 and 2.83 ± 1.61 seconds, respectively. The proportion of self-reported and objective difficulty was higher with longer stair ascent and descent times (P<.001 for trend for both stair ascent and descent). Of the 472 participants with at least 1 follow-up interview, 315 developed functional decline, with a 12-month cumulative incidence of 56.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.1%-61.3%). The stair negotiation time was a significant predictor of functional decline after adjusting for covariates including gait velocity (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] per 1-s increase: aHR=1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.21] for stair ascent time; aHR=1.15 [95% CI, 1.07-1.24] for stair descent time). Stair descent time was a significant predictor of functional decline among relatively high functioning older adults reporting no difficulty in stair negotiation (P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The stair ascent and descent times are simple, quick, and valid clinical measures for assessing the risk of functional decline in community-dwelling older adults including high-functioning individuals.

摘要

目的

为社区居住、能行走的老年人确定上下楼梯时间的参考值,并检验其对功能下降的预测效度。

设计

纵向队列研究。平均随访时间为 1.8 年(最长 3.2 年;总随访时间为 857.9 人年)。

地点

社区样本。

参与者

无残疾或痴呆的 70 岁及以上成年人(N=513;平均年龄 80.8±5.1 岁)。

干预

不适用。

主要观察指标

在基线时测量上、下 3 级楼梯的时间。在基线和每 2~3 个月的随访访谈时使用 14 分残疾量表评估功能状态。功能下降定义为随访期间残疾评分增加 1 分。

结果

上、下 3 级楼梯的平均(±SD)时间分别为 2.78±1.49 秒和 2.83±1.61 秒。上、下楼梯时间较长者报告主观和客观困难的比例更高(趋势 P<.001)。在至少有 1 次随访访谈的 472 名参与者中,315 名发生了功能下降,12 个月累积发生率为 56.6%(95%置信区间[CI],52.1%-61.3%)。调整包括步态速度在内的协变量后,楼梯协商时间是功能下降的显著预测因素(每增加 1 秒,上楼梯时间的校正后危险比[aHR]:aHR=1.12[95%CI,1.04-1.21];下楼梯时间的 aHR=1.15[95%CI,1.07-1.24])。在报告楼梯协商无障碍的高功能老年人中,下楼梯时间是功能下降的显著预测因素(P=.001)。

结论

上、下楼梯时间是评估社区居住的老年人(包括高功能个体)功能下降风险的简单、快速、有效的临床指标。

相似文献

1
Stair negotiation time in community-dwelling older adults: normative values and association with functional decline.社区居住的老年人上下楼梯时间:正常值和与功能下降的关联。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;92(12):2006-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.193.
2
Clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation performance in older adults.老年人上下楼梯表现的临床有意义变化。
Gait Posture. 2012 Jul;36(3):532-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
3
Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Assessing Stair Function in Older Adults.台阶测试评估(STEPS):评估老年人的楼梯功能。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2024;47(4):214-221. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000415. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
4
Physical and psychological factors associated with stair negotiation performance in older people.与老年人上下楼梯能力相关的生理和心理因素。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Nov;62(11):1259-65. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.11.1259.
5
Stair performance in people aged 75 and older.75岁及以上人群的楼梯行走能力。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):563-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52162.x.
6
Stair Climbing Ability and Identification of the Nine Stairs Ascent and Descent Test Cut-Off Points in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients: A Retrospective Study.髋骨关节炎患者的爬楼梯能力及九阶梯上下楼梯试验截断点的确定:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41095. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41095. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Can a single lower trunk body-fixed sensor differentiate between level-walking and stair descent and ascent in older adults? Preliminary findings.单个下躯干身体固定传感器能否区分老年人的平地行走与上下楼梯?初步研究结果。
Med Eng Phys. 2016 Oct;38(10):1146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
8
New Methods to Monitor Stair Ascents Using a Wearable Pendant Device Reveal How Behavior, Fear, and Frailty Influence Falls in Octogenarians.使用可穿戴吊坠设备监测老年人上楼梯的新方法揭示了行为、恐惧和虚弱如何影响八旬老人的跌倒情况。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Nov;62(11):2595-601. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2464689. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
9
Stair-descent phenotypes in community-dwelling older adults determined using high-level balance tasks.使用高级平衡任务确定社区居住老年人的下楼梯表型。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Jan 29;37(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-02929-5.
10
Decline in Fast Gait Speed as a Predictor of Disability in Older Adults.步速下降作为老年人残疾的预测指标
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun;63(6):1129-36. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13442. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Principal Component Analysis of Stair Negotiation and Floor Transition Kinematics in Older Adults With and Without Functional Disability: Cross-Sectional Study.有和没有功能障碍的老年人上下楼梯及地面转换运动学的主成分分析:横断面研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Aug 27;8:e71530. doi: 10.2196/71530.
2
Older Adults' and Professionals' Attitudes Towards Stair-Fall Prevention Interventions.老年人和专业人士对预防楼梯跌倒干预措施的态度。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;13(11):1324. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111324.
3
Chinese validation of "subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome" screening tool in patients with coronary artery disease using Rasch analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of function and disability in longitudinal studies.纵向研究中的功能和残疾评估。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Oct;58 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S308-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02914.x.
2
Interrater reliability and validity of the stair ascend/descend test in subjects with total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后患者上下楼梯测试的评分者间信度和效度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;91(6):932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.02.003.
3
Within-person across-neuropsychological test variability and incident dementia.个体内部神经心理学测试结果的变异性与痴呆症发病
使用拉施分析对冠心病患者进行“主观运动认知风险综合征”筛查工具的中文验证。
Front Aging. 2025 May 15;6:1505847. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1505847. eCollection 2025.
4
Instrumented insoles for assessment of gait in patients with vestibular schwannoma.用于评估前庭神经鞘瘤患者步态的仪器化鞋垫
Wearable Technol. 2023 May 10;4:e14. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2023.11. eCollection 2023.
5
Lipedema Reduction Surgery Improves Pain, Mobility, Physical Function, and Quality of Life: Case Series Report.脂肪水肿减轻手术改善疼痛、活动能力、身体功能和生活质量:病例系列报告
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):e5436. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005436. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Systematic review of candidate prognostic factors for falling in older adults identified from motion analysis of challenging walking tasks.对通过具有挑战性的步行任务运动分析确定的老年人跌倒候选预后因素的系统评价。
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2023 Feb 11;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s11556-023-00312-9.
7
Validation of a "subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome" screening tool for motoric cognitive risk syndrome-A prospective cohort study.验证一种用于运动认知风险综合征的“主观运动认知风险综合征”筛查工具:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Oct;29(10):2925-2933. doi: 10.1111/ene.15476. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
8
Vibrotactile somatosensory stimulus to assist the transition from level walking to stair ascent in the elderly: a pilot study.振动触觉体感刺激辅助老年人从平地行走过渡到楼梯上升:一项初步研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 24;22(Suppl 1):1066. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05093-3.
9
Prefrontal Cortex Involvement during Dual-Task Stair Climbing in Healthy Older Adults: An fNIRS Study.健康老年人在双任务爬楼梯过程中前额叶皮层的参与:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 7;11(1):71. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010071.
10
Subjective Motoric Complaints and New Onset Slow Gait.主观运动性抱怨和新发缓慢步态。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 Sep 13;76(10):e245-e252. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa321.
JAMA. 2008 Aug 20;300(7):823-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.7.823.
4
Influence of light handrail use on the biomechanics of stair negotiation in old age.使用轻质扶手对老年人上下楼梯生物力学的影响。
Gait Posture. 2008 Aug;28(2):327-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.014. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
5
Self-reported difficulty in climbing up or down stairs in nondisabled elderly.非残疾老年人自我报告的上下楼梯困难。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.129.
6
Physical and psychological factors associated with stair negotiation performance in older people.与老年人上下楼梯能力相关的生理和心理因素。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Nov;62(11):1259-65. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.11.1259.
7
The demands of stair descent relative to maximum capacities in elderly and young adults.老年人和年轻人下楼梯的需求相对于最大能力的情况。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):218-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
8
Is stair climb power a clinically relevant measure of leg power impairments in at-risk older adults?爬楼梯能力是否是评估高危老年人腿部力量受损的临床相关指标?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 May;88(5):604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.004.
9
Care needs and level of care difficulty related to hip fractures in geriatric populations during the post-discharge transition period.老年人群髋部骨折出院后过渡期的护理需求及护理难度水平
J Nurs Res. 2006 Dec;14(4):251-60. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000387584.89468.30.
10
Cognitive processes related to gait velocity: results from the Einstein Aging Study.与步速相关的认知过程:爱因斯坦衰老研究的结果
Neuropsychology. 2006 Mar;20(2):215-23. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.215.