The Fleischman Faculty of Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012 Feb;50(2):173-82. doi: 10.1007/s11517-011-0849-5. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
While aortic valve root compliance and leaflet coaptation have significant influence on valve closure, their implications have not yet been fully evaluated. The present study developed a full fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model that is able to cope with arbitrary coaptation between the leaflets of the aortic valve during the closing phase. Two simplifications were also evaluated for the simulation of the closing phase only. One employs an FSI model with a rigid root and the other uses a "dry" (without flow) model. Numerical tests were performed to verify the model. New metrics were defined to process the results in terms of leaflet coaptation area and contact pressure. The axial displacement of the leaflets, closure time and coaptation parameters were similar in the two FSI models, whereas the dry model, with imposed uniform load on the leaflets, produced larger coaptation area and contact pressure, larger axial displacement and faster closure time compared with the FSI model. The differences were up to 30% in the coaptation area, 55% in the contact pressure and 170% in the closure time. Consequently, an FSI model should be used to accurately resolve the kinematics of the aortic valve and leaflet coaptation details during the end-closing stage.
虽然主动脉瓣根部顺应性和瓣叶对合对瓣膜关闭有重要影响,但它们的影响尚未得到充分评估。本研究开发了一个完全的流固耦合(FSI)模型,该模型能够处理主动脉瓣关闭阶段瓣叶之间的任意对合。还评估了仅用于模拟关闭阶段的两种简化方法。一种采用具有刚性根部的 FSI 模型,另一种采用“干”(无流)模型。进行了数值测试来验证模型。定义了新的指标,以便根据瓣叶对合面积和接触压力处理结果。在两种 FSI 模型中,瓣叶的轴向位移、关闭时间和对合参数相似,而干模型则在瓣叶上施加均匀载荷,与 FSI 模型相比,产生更大的对合面积和接触压力、更大的轴向位移和更快的关闭时间。对合面积的差异最大可达 30%,接触压力的差异最大可达 55%,关闭时间的差异最大可达 170%。因此,应该使用 FSI 模型来准确地解析主动脉瓣和瓣叶在终末关闭阶段的运动学和对合细节。