Seza Katsushi, Yamaguchi Taketo, Ishihara Takeshi, Tadenema Hiroshi, Tawada Katsunobu, Saisho Hiromitsu, Yokosuka Osamu
Department of Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Nov-Dec;58(112):2128-31. doi: 10.5754/hge09346.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic pancreatic stenting (EPS) has been used to treat main pancreatic duct (MPD) stricture in chronic pancreatitis (CP), with favourable reported results. However, most studies were retrospective and uncontrolled. We conducted a longterm prospective controlled study of EPS for treatment of MPD stricture in CP.
Consecutive patients with CP were treated to remove pancreatic stones by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or endoscopic basket extraction. After treatment, 41 patients were enrolled in the study upon meeting the criteria of complete removal of stones, pain relief after the treatment, and dominant stricture of the MPD. Twenty patients chose EPS, while 22 control patients did not. We compared recurrence of pain and pancreatic function between groups for over 3 years of follow-up.
The mean follow-up period was 62.5 ± 20.9 months. Pain recurred in 15% of EPS patients (3/20) and in 50.0% of control patients (11/22), a significant difference (p<0.05). Progression of exocrine insufficiency in the EPS group was significantly slower than in the control group (p<0.05), while endocrine function showed no difference between groups.
EPS reduced pain recurrence and slowed down the progression of exocrine insufficiency in CP patients with MPD stricture.
背景/目的:内镜下胰管支架置入术(EPS)已用于治疗慢性胰腺炎(CP)中的主胰管(MPD)狭窄,报道结果良好。然而,大多数研究是回顾性且无对照的。我们进行了一项关于EPS治疗CP中MPD狭窄的长期前瞻性对照研究。
对CP患者采用体外冲击波碎石术或内镜篮式取石术连续治疗以清除胰腺结石。治疗后,41例患者在满足结石完全清除、治疗后疼痛缓解以及MPD主导性狭窄的标准后纳入研究。20例患者选择EPS,而22例对照患者未选择。我们比较了两组在超过3年随访期内疼痛复发情况和胰腺功能。
平均随访期为62.5±20.9个月。EPS组15%(3/20)的患者疼痛复发,而对照组为50.0%(11/22),差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。EPS组外分泌功能不全的进展明显慢于对照组(p<0.05),而内分泌功能在两组间无差异。
EPS降低了MPD狭窄的CP患者的疼痛复发率,并减缓了外分泌功能不全的进展。