Suppr超能文献

荷兰的健康不平等:一项关于 D 型(苦恼)人格作用的横断面研究。

Health inequalities in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study of the role of Type D (distressed) personality.

机构信息

Academic Collaborative Centre Public Health Brabant, Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Tilburg, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 18;12:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-46.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, as in many European countries, inequalities in health exist between people with a high and a low socioeconomic status (SES). From the perspective of the 'indirect selection hypothesis', this study was designed to expand our understanding of the role of Type D personality as an explanation of health inequalities.

METHODS

Data came from two cross-sectional Dutch surveys among the general population (aged between 19 and 64 years, response 53.7%, n = 12,090). We analyzed the relative risks of low SES, assessed using education and income, and Type D personality, assessed using the Type D Scale-14 (DS14), for different outcomes regarding lifestyle-related risk factors and health, using multivariate Generalized Linear Models.

RESULTS

Results showed that Type D personality was significantly associated with low SES (OR = 1.7 for both low education and low income). Moreover, the relative risks of Type D personality and low SES were significantly elevated for most adverse health outcomes, unconditionally as well as conditionally.

CONCLUSION

The cross-sectional design hinders the making of definite etiological inferences. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that Type D personality does not explain the socioeconomic health inequalities, but is a risk factor in addition to low SES. Prevention of adverse health outcomes in low SES populations may have more effect when it takes into account that persons with a low SES in combination with a Type D personality are at highest risk.

摘要

背景

在荷兰,与许多欧洲国家一样,高社会经济地位(SES)和低 SES 人群之间存在健康不平等。从“间接选择假设”的角度来看,本研究旨在扩大我们对 D 型人格作为健康不平等解释的作用的理解。

方法

数据来自荷兰两项针对普通人群的横断面调查(年龄在 19 至 64 岁之间,应答率为 53.7%,n=12090)。我们使用多元广义线性模型分析了低 SES(使用教育和收入评估)和 D 型人格(使用 D 型量表-14(DS14)评估)与生活方式相关风险因素和健康的不同结果之间的相对风险。

结果

结果表明,D 型人格与低 SES 显著相关(低教育和低收入的 OR=1.7)。此外,无论是否有条件,D 型人格和低 SES 的相对风险对于大多数不良健康结果都显著升高。

结论

横断面设计阻碍了明确的病因推断。然而,我们的研究结果表明,D 型人格并不能解释社会经济健康不平等,而是除了低 SES 之外的另一个风险因素。在考虑到具有低 SES 并伴有 D 型人格的人群面临最高风险时,预防低 SES 人群的不良健康结果可能会更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac76/3293707/1cf5ca75ff48/1471-2458-12-46-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验