Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 May;21(2):S140-53. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0089). Epub 2012 Jan 31.
To create two matched short forms of the Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT; Roach, Schwartz, Martin, Grewal, & Brecher, 1996) that yield similar results to the PNT for measuring anomia.
In Study 1, archived naming data from 94 individuals with aphasia were used to identify which PNT items should be included in the short forms. The 2 constructed sets of 30 items, PNT30-A and PNT30-B, were validated using archived data from a separate group of 56 individuals with aphasia. In Study 2, the reliability of the PNT, PNT30-A, and PNT30-B across independent test administrations was evaluated with a new group of 25 individuals with aphasia who were selected to represent the full range of naming impairment.
In Study 1, PNT30-A and PNT30-B were found to be internally consistent, and accuracy scores on these subsets of items were highly correlated with the full PNT. In Study 2, PNT accuracy was extremely reliable over the span of 1 week, and independent administrations of PNT30-A and PNT30-B produced similar results to the PNT and to each other.
The short forms of the PNT can be used to reliably estimate PNT performance, and the results can be compared to the provided norms. The 2 matched tests allow for the measurement of change in an individual's naming ability.
创建两个匹配的费城命名测试（PNT）短式，其结果与 PNT 相似，用于测量命名障碍。
在研究 1 中，使用来自 94 名失语症患者的存档命名数据来确定 PNT 项目中应包含哪些项目。这两个由 30 个项目组成的集合，PNT30-A 和 PNT30-B，使用来自另一组 56 名失语症患者的存档数据进行了验证。在研究 2 中，使用新的一组 25 名失语症患者评估了 PNT、PNT30-A 和 PNT30-B 在独立测试中的可靠性，这些患者被选择代表命名障碍的全范围。
在研究 1 中，发现 PNT30-A 和 PNT30-B 具有内部一致性，并且这些项目子集的准确性得分与完整的 PNT 高度相关。在研究 2 中，PNT 在一周的时间内非常可靠，并且 PNT30-A 和 PNT30-B 的独立管理产生了与 PNT 和彼此相似的结果。
PNT 的短式可以可靠地估计 PNT 的表现，并且可以将结果与提供的标准进行比较。这两个匹配的测试允许测量个体命名能力的变化。
