Univ. of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Jun;50(6):2034-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00330-12. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
The Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) instruments were evaluated for the identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) by a blinded comparison to conventional biochemical or molecular methods. Two hundred NFGNB that were recovered from cultures from cystic fibrosis patients in the University of Iowa Health Care (UIHC) Microbiology Laboratory between 1 January 2006 and 31 October 2010 were sent to Mayo Clinic for analysis with the Bruker Biotyper (software version 3.0) and to bioMérieux for testing with Vitek MS (SARAMIS database version 3.62). If two attempts at direct colony testing failed to provide an acceptable MALDI-TOF identification, an extraction procedure was performed. The MS identifications from both of these systems were provided to UIHC for comparison to the biochemical or molecular identification that had been reported in the patient record. Isolates with discordant results were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing at UIHC. After discrepancy testing, the Bruker Biotyper result agreed with the biochemical or molecular method, with 72.5% of isolates to the species level, 5.5% to the complex level, and 19% to the genus level (3% not identified). The level of agreement for Vitek MS was 80% species, 3.5% complex, 6% genus, and 3.5% family (7% not identified). Both MS systems provided rapid (≤3 min per isolate) and reliable identifications. The agreement of combined species/complex/genus-level identification with the reference method was higher for the Bruker Biotyper (97% versus 89.5%, P = 0.004) but required an extraction step more often. Species-level agreement with the reference method was similar for both MS systems (72.5% and 80%, P = 0.099).
布鲁克 Biotyper 和 Vitek MS 基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱(MS)仪器通过与传统生化或分子方法进行盲法比较,用于鉴定非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌(NFGNB)。2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 10 月 31 日期间,从爱荷华大学健康中心(UIHC)微生物实验室培养物中回收的 200 株 NFGNB 被送往梅奥诊所进行布鲁克 Biotyper(软件版本 3.0)分析和生物梅里埃公司进行 Vitek MS(SARAMIS 数据库版本 3.62)测试。如果两次直接菌落测试都未能提供可接受的 MALDI-TOF 鉴定,则进行提取程序。这两个系统的 MS 鉴定结果被提供给 UIHC,以与患者记录中报告的生化或分子鉴定进行比较。结果不一致的分离物在 UIHC 通过 16S rRNA 基因测序进行分析。经过差异测试,布鲁克 Biotyper 结果与生化或分子方法一致,72.5%的分离物达到种水平,5.5%达到复合体水平,19%达到属水平(3%未鉴定)。Vitek MS 的一致性为 80%的种,3.5%的复合体,6%的属,3.5%的科(7%未鉴定)。两种 MS 系统都提供了快速(每个分离物≤3 分钟)和可靠的鉴定。布鲁克 Biotyper 与参考方法的联合种/复合体/属水平鉴定的一致性更高(97%对 89.5%,P=0.004),但需要更频繁地进行提取步骤。与参考方法的种水平一致性对于两种 MS 系统相似(72.5%和 80%,P=0.099)。