Scottish Centre for Indoor Air, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 2;12:324. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-324.
The evaluation of smoke-free legislation (SFL) in the UK examined the impacts on exposure to second-hand smoke, workers' attitudes and changes in respiratory health. Studies that investigate changes in the health of groups of people often use self-reported symptoms. Due to the subjective nature it is of interest to determine whether workers' attitudes towards the change in their working conditions may be linked to the change in health they report.
Bar workers were recruited before the introduction of the SFL in Scotland and England with the aim of investigating their changes to health, attitudes and exposure as a result of the SFL. They were asked about their attitudes towards SFL and the presence of respiratory and sensory symptoms both before SFL and one year later. Here we examine the possibility of a relationship between initial attitudes and changes in reported symptoms, through the use of regression analyses.
There was no difference in the initial attitudes towards SFL between those working in Scotland and England. Bar workers who were educated to a higher level tended to be more positive towards SFL. Attitude towards SFL was not found to be related to change in reported symptoms for bar workers in England (Respiratory, p = 0.755; Sensory, p = 0.910). In Scotland there was suggestion of a relationship with reporting of respiratory symptoms (p = 0.042), where those who were initially more negative to SFL experienced a greater improvement in self-reported health.
There was no evidence that workers who were more positive towards SFL reported greater improvements in respiratory and sensory symptoms. This may not be the case in all interventions and we recommend examining subjects' attitudes towards the proposed intervention when evaluating possible health benefits using self-reported methods.
英国对无烟立法(SFL)的评估考察了其对二手烟暴露、工人态度和呼吸道健康变化的影响。研究人群健康变化的研究通常使用自我报告的症状。由于其主观性,人们有兴趣确定工人对工作条件变化的态度是否与他们报告的健康变化有关。
在苏格兰和英格兰引入 SFL 之前,招募了酒吧工作人员,旨在调查他们由于 SFL 而导致健康、态度和暴露方面的变化。在 SFL 之前和一年后,他们被问及对 SFL 的态度以及呼吸道和感官症状的存在。在这里,我们通过回归分析来研究初始态度与报告症状变化之间的关系的可能性。
在苏格兰和英格兰工作的人对 SFL 的初始态度没有差异。受教育程度较高的酒吧工作人员往往对 SFL 更为积极。对 SFL 的态度与英格兰酒吧工作人员报告症状的变化无关(呼吸道,p=0.755;感官,p=0.910)。在苏格兰,与呼吸道症状的报告有一定的关系(p=0.042),那些最初对 SFL 持负面态度的人自我报告的健康状况有了更大的改善。
没有证据表明对 SFL 更积极的工人报告呼吸道和感官症状有更大的改善。在所有干预措施中情况可能并非如此,我们建议在使用自我报告方法评估可能的健康益处时,检查受试者对拟议干预措施的态度。