Confounding: what is it and how do we deal with it?
作者信息
Braga Luis Henrique P, Farrokhyar Forough, Bhandari Mohit
机构信息
Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
出版信息
Can J Surg. 2012 Apr;55(2):132-8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.036311.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Confounding: what is it and how do we deal with it?混杂因素：它是什么以及我们如何应对？
Can J Surg. 2012 Apr;55(2):132-8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.036311.
2
Evidence level of individual studies: a proposed framework for surgical research.个体研究的证据水平：手术研究的一个拟议框架
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1484-90. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318256dc4d.
3
Longitudinal Studies 4: Matching Strategies to Evaluate Risk.纵向研究 4：匹配策略评估风险。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:167-177. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_9.
4
Matched designs and causal diagrams.匹配设计和因果图。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):860-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt083.
5
Can surgical research improve health?外科研究能改善健康状况吗？
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018 Nov 2;79(11):606-607. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.11.606.
6
Using Instrumental Variables to Address Bias From Unobserved Confounders.使用工具变量解决未观察到的混杂因素导致的偏差。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 4;321(21):2124-2125. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5646.
7
Selection of controls in case-control studies. III. Design options.病例对照研究中对照的选择。III. 设计选项。
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 May 1;135(9):1042-50. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116398.
8
Case-control matching: effects, misconceptions, and recommendations.病例对照匹配：效果、误解与建议。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;33(1):5-14. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0325-0. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
9
Randomized trials analyzed as observational studies.作为观察性研究进行分析的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Oct 15;159(8):560-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-8-201310150-00709.
10
Increasing levels of restriction in pharmacoepidemiologic database studies of elderly and comparison with randomized trial results.老年人群药物流行病学数据库研究中限制水平的提高及其与随机试验结果的比较。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S131-42. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318070c08e.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparing Machine Learning and Advanced Methods with Traditional Methods to Generate Weights in Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: The INFORM Study.比较机器学习和先进方法与传统方法在处理加权逆概率中生成权重的情况：INFORM研究。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2024 Oct 4;15:173-183. doi: 10.2147/POR.S466505. eCollection 2024.
2
The causality between use of glucocorticoids and risk of pancreatitis: a Mendelian randomization study.糖皮质激素使用与胰腺炎风险之间的因果关系：一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 15;15:1420840. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1420840. eCollection 2024.
3
Reversal of neuromuscular block with neostigmine and sugammadex: a retrospective cohort study in two centers using different types of neuromuscular monitoring.新斯的明与舒更葡糖用于逆转神经肌肉阻滞：一项在两个中心开展的使用不同类型神经肌肉监测的回顾性队列研究
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Feb;39(1):141-148. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01192-9. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
4
Potential biomarkers for predicting immune response and outcomes in lung cancer patients undergoing thermal ablation.预测肺癌患者接受热消融治疗后免疫反应和结局的潜在生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2023 Nov 1;14:1268331. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1268331. eCollection 2023.
5
Effectiveness of Digital Guided Self-help Mindfulness Training During Pregnancy on Maternal Psychological Distress and Infant Neuropsychological Development: Randomized Controlled Trial.妊娠期数字化引导自助式正念训练对产妇心理困扰和婴儿神经心理发育的效果：随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 10;25:e41298. doi: 10.2196/41298.
6
Association between Pet Ownership and Threatened Abortion in Pregnant Women: The China Birth Cohort Study.宠物拥有与孕妇先兆流产的关系：中国出生队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16374. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316374.
7
Point-counterpoint: The MERINO trial and what it should imply for future treatment of ESBL bacteremia.针锋相对：MERINO试验及其对未来ESBL菌血症治疗的启示
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2019 Oct 11;4(3):125-130. doi: 10.3138/jammi.2019-0012. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
A review of long-term pesticide monitoring studies to assess surface water quality trends.一项评估地表水质量趋势的长期农药监测研究综述。
Water Res X. 2020 Sep 6;9:100064. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100064. eCollection 2020 Dec 1.
9
Methods for the Selection of Covariates in Nutritional Epidemiology Studies: A Meta-Epidemiological Review.营养流行病学研究中协变量的选择方法：一项Meta流行病学综述
Curr Dev Nutr. 2019 Sep 17;3(10):nzz104. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzz104. eCollection 2019 Oct.
10
The Challenges and Opportunities of Pharmacoepidemiology in Bone Diseases.骨病药物流行病学的挑战与机遇
JBMR Plus. 2018 Apr 30;2(4):187-194. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10051. eCollection 2018 Jul.
本文引用的文献
1
Practical tips for surgical research. Ensuring balanced groups in surgical trials.外科研究实用技巧。确保外科试验中的组间均衡。
Can J Surg. 2010 Dec;53(6):418-23.
2
The impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes of open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, 2005-2007.2005-2007 年国家外科质量改进计划中体重指数对开放和血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术围手术期结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Dec;52(6):1471-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
3
Stratification for confounding--part 2: direct and indirect standardization.分层处理混杂因素——第 2 部分：直接标准化和间接标准化。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;116(4):c322-5. doi: 10.1159/000319591. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
4
Stratification for confounding--part 1: the Mantel-Haenszel formula.分层分析-第 1 部分：Mantel-Haenszel 公式。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;116(4):c317-21. doi: 10.1159/000319590. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
5
Practical tips for surgical research: Research questions, hypotheses and objectives.外科研究实用技巧：研究问题、假设与目标。
Can J Surg. 2010 Aug;53(4):278-81.
6
Confounding.混杂因素。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;116(2):c143-7. doi: 10.1159/000315883. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
7
Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches.医疗数据库研究中的混杂控制：挑战与潜在方法。
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S114-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbebe3.
8
Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions.随机对照试验的手术干预。
Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):409-16. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf863d.
9
Analysis of observational studies: a guide to understanding statistical methods.观察性研究分析：理解统计方法指南
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91 Suppl 3:50-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01577.
10
Linear and logistic regression analysis.线性和逻辑回归分析。
Kidney Int. 2008 Apr;73(7):806-10. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002787. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
Zotero 插件