Suppr超能文献

指代消解与工具推理解释中的表征层次

Levels of representation in the interpretation of anaphoric reference and instrument inference.

作者信息

Lucas M M, Tanenhaus M K, Carlson G N

机构信息

Wellesley College, Department of Psychology, MA 02181.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1990 Nov;18(6):611-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03197104.

Abstract

The level of representation accessed when inferences are made during sentence comprehension was examined. The inferences investigated included antecedent assignment for both definite noun phrase anaphors and pronouns and also instrument inferences. In making these inferences, a listener must access the inferred element, whether an antecedent or an instrument, in either a linguistic form representation or a discourse model. The level of representation involved in these inferences was determined by exploiting differences in the lexical decision and naming tasks, which were argued to exhibit differential sensitivity to representational levels. In three experiments, the priming of antecedent and instrument targets in the lexical decision task was compared with priming of the same targets in the naming task. Differences in the patterns of activation across the two tasks indicated that all three types of inferences required accessing elements in a discourse model. Three control experiments ruled out simple context or congruity checking as an explanation for our results. The following conclusions were also supported by these studies: (1) Antecedent assignment occurs immediately after processing an anaphor; (2) antecedent assignment involves inhibition for the inappropriate antecedent rather than facilitation for the appropriate antecedent; (3) although subjects do not make instrument inferences when they hear isolated sentences containing verbs that strongly imply certain instruments, the inferences are made when sentences are preceded by a context that mentions the instrument.

摘要

本研究考察了在句子理解过程中进行推理时所通达的表征水平。所研究的推理包括限定名词短语回指词和代词的先行词赋值,以及工具推理。在进行这些推理时,听者必须在语言形式表征或语篇模型中通达被推理的元素,无论是先行词还是工具。通过利用词汇判断任务和命名任务中的差异来确定这些推理所涉及的表征水平,据称这两种任务对表征水平表现出不同的敏感性。在三个实验中,将词汇判断任务中先行词和工具目标的启动与命名任务中相同目标的启动进行了比较。两个任务中激活模式的差异表明,所有三种类型的推理都需要通达语篇模型中的元素。三个控制实验排除了简单的语境或一致性检查作为对我们结果的解释。这些研究还支持了以下结论:(1) 回指词处理后立即进行先行词赋值;(2) 先行词赋值涉及对不适当先行词的抑制,而不是对适当先行词的促进;(3) 尽管当受试者听到包含强烈暗示特定工具的动词的孤立句子时不会进行工具推理,但当句子之前有提及该工具的语境时,他们会进行推理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验