Ramulu Pradeep Y, West Sheila K, Munoz Beatriz, Jampel Henry D, Friedman David S
Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Oct;116(10):1846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.033. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
To determine if glaucoma is associated with driving limitation or cessation.
Cross-sectional analysis within a longitudinal, population-based cohort study.
One thousand one hundred thirty-five ever-drivers between 73 and 93, including 70 subjects with unilateral and 68 subjects with bilateral glaucoma.
All subjects reported their driving habits during each of 4 study rounds. During the fourth and final study round, subjects were assessed systematically for the presence of glaucoma.
Self-reported driving cessation or driving limitation, including cessation of night driving, driving fewer than 3000 miles annually, or cessation of driving in unfamiliar areas.
Fifteen percent of subjects without glaucoma no longer were driving at the end of the cohort study, compared with 21% of unilateral glaucoma subjects (P = 0.2) and 41% of bilateral glaucoma subjects (P<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that bilateral (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; P = 0.002), but not unilateral (OR, 1.5; P = 0.3), glaucoma subjects were more likely no longer to be driving when compared with subjects without glaucoma. The odds that bilateral glaucoma subjects no longer were driving doubled for every 5 dB of visual field (VF) worsening in the better eye (P<0.001). Driving cessation within the previous 2 years was analyzed using separate multiple regression models, and both bilateral (OR, 3.6; P = 0.004) and unilateral (OR, 2.4; P = 0.06) glaucoma subjects were more likely to stop driving over this period than subjects without glaucoma. Driving cessation associated with bilateral glaucoma was present in 0.82% of the population, or 1 in every 122 individuals. Greater numbers of driving limitations were not more likely among subjects with glaucoma than subjects without glaucoma. However, bilateral glaucoma subjects did attribute more driving limitations to difficulties with their vision than subjects without glaucoma (OR, 2.2; P = 0.02).
Bilateral, and possibly unilateral, glaucoma is associated with significantly higher rates of driving cessation among the elderly. The substantial difference in driving patterns seen with different degrees of better-eye VF damage suggests that minimizing VF loss in the better-seeing eye is associated with better functional outcomes.
确定青光眼是否与驾驶受限或停止驾驶有关。
在一项基于人群的纵向队列研究中进行横断面分析。
1135名年龄在73至93岁之间的曾经驾驶者,其中包括70名单侧青光眼患者和68名双侧青光眼患者。
所有受试者在4个研究轮次中的每一轮都报告了他们的驾驶习惯。在第四个也是最后一个研究轮次中,对受试者进行了青光眼存在情况的系统评估。
自我报告的停止驾驶或驾驶受限情况,包括停止夜间驾驶、每年驾驶里程少于3000英里或停止在不熟悉的区域驾驶。
在队列研究结束时,没有青光眼的受试者中有15%不再驾驶,单侧青光眼受试者为21%(P = 0.2),双侧青光眼受试者为41%(P<0.001)。多变量回归分析显示,与没有青光眼的受试者相比,双侧青光眼受试者(比值比[OR],2.6;P = 0.002)而非单侧青光眼受试者(OR,1.5;P = 0.3)更有可能不再驾驶。较好眼每5分贝视野(VF)恶化,双侧青光眼受试者不再驾驶的几率就会翻倍(P<0.001)。使用单独的多元回归模型分析了过去2年内停止驾驶的情况,在此期间,双侧青光眼受试者(OR,3.6;P = 0.004)和单侧青光眼受试者(OR,2.4;P = 0.06)比没有青光眼的受试者更有可能停止驾驶。双侧青光眼导致的停止驾驶在人群中的发生率为0.82%,即每122人中就有1人。青光眼患者比没有青光眼的受试者更不容易出现更多的驾驶受限情况。然而,与没有青光眼的受试者相比,双侧青光眼受试者确实将更多的驾驶受限归因于视力问题(OR,2.2;P = 0.02)。
双侧青光眼,可能还有单侧青光眼,与老年人中显著更高的停止驾驶率有关。不同程度的较好眼VF损害所观察到的驾驶模式的显著差异表明,尽量减少较好眼的VF损失与更好的功能结局相关。