Suppr超能文献

现场检测口腔液中的大麻素。

On-site test for cannabinoids in oral fluid.

机构信息

Chemistry and Drug Metabolism Section, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2012 Oct;58(10):1418-25. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.189001. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral fluid (OF) testing offers noninvasive sample collection for on-site drug testing; however, to date, test performance for Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) detection has had unacceptable diagnostic sensitivity. On-site tests must accurately identify cannabis exposure because this drug accounts for the highest prevalence in workplace drug testing and driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) programs.

METHODS

Ten cannabis smokers (9 males, 1 female) provided written informed consent to participate in this institutional review board-approved study and smoked 1 6.8%-THC cigarette ad libitum. OF was collected with the Draeger DrugTest(®) 5000 test cassette and Quantisal™ device 0.5 h before and up to 22 h after smoking. Test cassettes were analyzed within 15 min (n = 66), and Quantisal GC-MS THC results obtained within 24 h. Final THC detection times and test performances were assessed at different cannabinoid cutoffs.

RESULTS

Diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, and efficiency at DrugTest 5000's 5 μg/L screening cutoff and various THC confirmation cutoffs were 86.2-90.7, 75.0-77.8, and 84.8-87.9%, respectively. Last detection times were >22 h, longer than previously suggested. Confirmation of 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC, absent in THC smoke, minimized the potential for passive OF contamination and still provided 22-h windows of detection, appropriate for workplace drug testing, whereas confirmation of cannabidiol, and/or cannabinol yielded shorter 6-h windows of detection, appropriate for DUID OF testing.

CONCLUSIONS

The DrugTest 5000 on-site device provided high diagnostic sensitivity for detection of cannabinoid exposure, and the selection of OF confirmation analytes and cutoffs provided appropriate windows of detection to meet the goals of different drug testing programs.

摘要

背景

口腔液(OF)检测为现场药物检测提供了非侵入性的样本采集;然而,迄今为止,用于检测 Δ(9)-四氢大麻酚(THC)的检测性能的诊断灵敏度一直不能令人接受。现场检测必须准确识别大麻暴露,因为这种药物在工作场所药物检测和药物影响下的驾驶(DUID)计划中占最高的流行率。

方法

10 名大麻吸烟者(9 名男性,1 名女性)书面同意参加这项机构审查委员会批准的研究,并随意吸食 1 支 6.8%-THC 香烟。在吸烟前 0.5 小时至 22 小时内,使用 Draeger DrugTest(®)5000 检测卡和 Quantisal™ 设备采集 OF。检测卡分析在 15 分钟内完成(n = 66),并在 24 小时内获得 Quantisal GC-MS THC 结果。在不同的大麻素截止值下评估最终 THC 检测时间和检测性能。

结果

在 DrugTest 5000 的 5 μg/L 筛查截止值和各种 THC 确认截止值下,诊断灵敏度、诊断特异性和效率分别为 86.2-90.7%、75.0-77.8%和 84.8-87.9%。最后检测时间超过 22 小时,比之前建议的时间长。确认 THC 烟雾中不存在的 11-去甲-9-羧基-THC,最大限度地减少了被动 OF 污染的可能性,并仍然提供了 22 小时的检测窗口,适用于工作场所药物检测,而确认大麻二酚和/或大麻醇则提供了更短的 6 小时检测窗口,适用于 DUID OF 检测。

结论

DrugTest 5000 现场检测设备为检测大麻素暴露提供了高诊断灵敏度,而选择 OF 确认分析物和截止值提供了适当的检测窗口,以满足不同药物检测计划的目标。

相似文献

1
On-site test for cannabinoids in oral fluid.现场检测口腔液中的大麻素。
Clin Chem. 2012 Oct;58(10):1418-25. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.189001. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
2
Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled smoked cannabis.口服大麻后口腔液中的大麻素分布情况。
Clin Chem. 2012 Apr;58(4):748-56. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.177881. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

3
Roadside screening tests for cannabis use: A systematic review.路边大麻使用筛查测试:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 22;9(4):e14630. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14630. eCollection 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Cannabinoids in oral fluid following passive exposure to marijuana smoke.口服液体中的大麻素:被动吸食大麻烟雾后的情况。
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Oct 10;212(1-3):227-30. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.06.019. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
The prevalence of drugs in injured drivers.受伤驾驶员中药物的流行情况。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Feb 10;215(1-3):14-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.040. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
9
Drugs in oral fluid in randomly selected drivers.随机抽取的驾驶员唾液中的药物
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Aug 6;170(2-3):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.03.028. Epub 2007 Jul 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验